Talk:1926 in baseball

Baseball High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Baseball assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:1926 in baseball/Comments (baseball), and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

For a list type of article, this 1926 in baseball is marginally informative. It provides important details like World Series who competed in the World Series in both the M.L.B. and the Negro League. It also provides the MVP awards for both the A.L. and the N.L. There are many tables in the article: four pertain to the standings of both the M.L.B. and Negro League. There is a small section titled "Events" that includes games where a milestone or record was either broken or tied. And finally, there is a section on births in baseball and deaths in baseball. While there are little words that detail how the year in baseball unfolded, there are many details that are in list form. I think this type of article is easier understood when in list form instead of paragraph form. I feel that this article qualifies for start-class quality. Please come and weigh in. Thanks Fdssdf (talk) 18:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)