Talk:1925 Canadian federal election
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Please check the multiple edits Nov. 13, 2005 to the many Canadian federal election pages by 69.197.178.95, a first time editor. The edits seem to consist in many cases of subtle changes to the numbers without attribution. It could be vandalism. Hu 05:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Independent Liberals
[edit]Other government pages, such as this say that there were 99 Liberals and 2 independent-Liberals, whereas this list says that the numbers were 100 and 1. Something fishy is going on. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 04:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
I think the discrepancy is due to History of Federal Ridings website counting Gustave Évanturel as a Liberal as supposed to an Indpendent Liberal. Notice that the page for his riding shows two liberals running in that election. Shipguy (talk) 01:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canadian federal election, 1925. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060928033124/http://www.histori.ca/prodev/article.do?id=15374 to http://www.histori.ca/prodev/article.do?id=15374
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)