Talk:1915 Vanderbilt Commodores football team

1915 Vanderbilt Commodores football team has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 29, 2016. (Reviewed version).

College football High‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vandy High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vanderbilt University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VandyWikipedia:WikiProject VandyTemplate:WikiProject VandyVandy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 9 September 2016..Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1915 Vanderbilt Commodores football team/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
"The outlook for the upcoming 1915 Vanderbilt football season was not good" - tad informal, try unsatisfactory Done

"To add to this, only 10 experienced players from the previous year were returning to the team" - Additionally Done

"In the third quarter, Johnny Floyd ripped off 47 yards and Hubert Wiggs took it over." - this is a duplink Done

"The 1915 Vanderbilt football team scored a grand total of 514 points in 510 minutes of actual playing time, thus ranking them as a legitimate "point-a-minute" team. Vanderbilt averaged 51.4 points a game. Vanderbilt led the nation in scoring, then one of few stats kept." - this needs a citation Done

All harvrefs leading to the Vanderbilt Football: Tales of Commodore Gridiron History book are broken and need to be fixed Done
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No original research found.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The article is well researched and mostly well written, however I found a few issues. Once they're dealt with, this should be good to go. JAGUAR 17:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I can see that all of the issues have been dealt with so this should be good to go.

JAGUAR 16:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]