Talk:1915 Singapore Mutiny

1915 Singapore Mutiny was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 29, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
March 1, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 19, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that a military coalition from four countries helped the British colonial government to quell the 1915 Singapore Mutiny?

Current status: Delisted good article

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / British / European / Indian / South Asia / Southeast Asia / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	World War I task force

POV and English needs improvement

The article is extremely POV. It is also written by a non-native English speaker and needs a rewrite. It is also unclear what caused this rebellion, was it nationalist or Islamic? I find it hard to believe that a unit of illiterates collected from various parts of India, that did not share the same ethnic backgrounds, but had only Islam in common, would be dedicated Indian nationalists -- in 1915. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.5.64.178 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 20 June 2007.

I've read the article, and the English seems quite alright. With regard to POV, would you please give your specific concerns? --Rifleman 82 01:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second World War vs 1915??

The article refers to the Second World War several times, yet the mutiny in question took place in 1915, the time period of the First World War. Am I missing something? Falconeer (talk) 20:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I spotted this error too & have made the necessary correction now. The mutiny occurred during WWI (also mentioned in the Mehmed V caption as per my last edit [1]) but somehow it was mistyped as 'WWII' during subsequent copyedits done by another editor. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 09:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket link to Mutiny

Editors might be interested in the article at http://content-www.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/77300.html which mentioned the mutiny and how it interrupted a cricket match. --Roisterer (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's an interesting tidbit but its inclusion (or without) doesn't add much perspective to the historical context of the article. Also, it may be awkward to include, as it may break the flow of narration in the article too. Thank u for this info mate. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 09:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something wrong

The incitement section states that the incitement came from the Sultan of Turkey, and the next section states that the actual mutiny occured against a fear of having to fight Muslim brethren. The problem is, the units mutinying were Rajput, who are Hindus and Sikhs, and it would be extremely surprising if they reposnded to the Sultans call. This needs sorting out, there is something missing. I note that the Ghadar party is mentioned in the introductory sections, I believe this has more relevance to this (from my own reading on the subject while writing Hindu-German Conspiracy) since the Ghadar movement was dominated by Sikhs. Also, as far as I am aware, the Singapore mutiny was a part of a larger conspiracy of a pan Indian mutiny in February 1915, ie Ghadar mutiny. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 18:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See the section in the main article under the heading "5th Light Infantry Regiment" which details the recruitment basis of the all-Muslim unit involved in the Singapore mutiny.

aah... rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 17:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Is there any reason the article isn't simply called the "Singapore Mutiny" as, I notice, it is in Russian? The "1915" tag seems unnecessary to me as there is no disambig and it currently redirects here anyway! —Brigade Piron (talk) 23:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1915 Singapore Mutiny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070612152816/http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_570_2005-01-24.html to http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_570_2005-01-24.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

1915 Singapore Mutiny

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Several uncited passages throughout the article, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 19:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.