Talk:1869 in baseball

Baseball: Old-time Base Ball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Records of professional teams

Here are the records of the professional teams in professional matches (W L T) and in all matches (v d n for victory, defeat, and no decision). This precisely follows Marshall Wright (no corrections), who generally tries to cover all matches between two NABBP members.

Club	W	L	T	home	v	d	n	comment
Cincinnati	19	0		Cincinnati	57	0		Cin. "Red Stockings"
Atlantic	15	6	1	Brooklyn	40	6	2
Eckford	15	8		Brooklyn	47	8
Athletic	15	7		Philadelphia	45	8
Union	12	8	1	Lansingburgh, NY	24	9	1	"Troy Haymakers"
Mutual	11	15		New York	36	16
Olympic	9	12		Washington	22	14
Maryland	7	14		Baltimore	14	13
National	4	12		Washington	13	13
Keystone	3	17		Philadelphia	12	21	1
Forest City	1	6		Cleveland	19	6
Irvington	0	8		Irvington, NJ	0	9		in Greater New York

While this may be useful for reference, my purpose is primarily sandbox. Beyond the obvious difference in layout, the non-numerical data differ slightly from those presented in the other table (see the article). --P64 (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]