Talk:185 Montague Street

185 Montague Street is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 15:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: Commercial building in Brooklyn, New York

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

185 Montague Street

... that just over a decade after 185 Montague Street was completed, one tenant proposed tearing down the building's upper stories? Source: "Brooklyn Offices in New Ownership; Webb & Knapp to Change 185 Montague St. Under Lease to Bank of Manhattan". The New York Times. October 14, 1944
- ALT1: ... that 185 Montague Street in New York City was once called "one of the jazziest little Art Deco skyscrapers in town"? Source: Morrone, Francis. An Architectural Guidebook to Brooklyn. Gibbs Smith. p. 146
- ALT2: ... that one critic likened the design of 185 Montague Street in New York City to the horns of Count Basie's orchestra? Source: Morrone, Francis. An Architectural Guidebook to Brooklyn. Gibbs Smith. p. 146
- ALT3: ... that 185 Montague Street in New York City was nearly fully occupied upon its completion, despite high vacancy rates in nearby buildings? Source: "New Bank to Serve Brooklyn Heights; Will Open This Week in Twelve-Story Title Guaranty Building". The New York Times. March 30, 1930.
- Reviewed: Michael Wettlaufer
- Comment: more hooks later

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 659 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 15:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good work overall. Of these hooks, I prefer ALT3 (the contrast of being nearly full in a high-vacancy area stands out) and ALT1 (the connection may be clearer with an explicit mention of Art Deco style). Epicgenius, did you still want to propose additional hooks for consideration? ^Complex/_Rational 15:36, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ComplexRational: Thanks for the review. On further thought, I don't think I have any other hooks in mind. Epicgenius (talk) 15:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]