Talk:15th Congress of the Philippines
A fact from 15th Congress of the Philippines appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 May 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article and Philippine House of Representatives elections, 2010
[edit]...should have the same stats, at least for the party membership at the day of the election. –Howard the Duck 13:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- However some changes happen and we'd expect that to come especially before the start of the session/s. The parties of these pols were as of December 2009 if we are to give credence to your request, and some of them changed parties during the campaign period, what more with the advent of the new administration, we expect more to jump ship especially from the Lakas-Kampi-CMD camp. Reyrefran (talk) 20:35, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- That's why citations are important. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 02:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- House members, with parties and districts in case anyone wants to synch our list with the official one. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 13:42, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Split members to a new article
[edit]To the following:
- List of representatives elected in the Philippine House of Representatives elections, 2010
- List of senators elected in the Philippine Senate election, 2010
since the article is long already. This should have more prose. See 1st Congress of the Commonwealth of the Philippines for an example. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 16:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. We should avoid, at least, for Philippine Congress articles to have just list. We need more space for the upcoming events of the Congress, like unexpected sensational news.--JL 09 q?c 16:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Articles are already created. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 08:40, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
BTW, some reps who were elected in 2010 won't finish their terms (such as Florencio Vargas and Ronald Singson). Why not move the list (both senators and reps) to List of current members of Congress of the Philippines? –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 04:32, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Lanao del Sur-1st
[edit]Can anyone check out who's the congressman there? The official website doesn't list anyone. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 10:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
File:HOR Philippines.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:HOR Philippines.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 15th Congress of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100907033857/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view/20100901-289928/2-impeach-raps-vs-Ombudsman-sufficient-in-formHouse-panel to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view/20100901-289928/2-impeach-raps-vs-Ombudsman-sufficient-in-formHouse-panel
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218072957/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20110215-320401/Ombudsman-impeach-case-get-SC-green-light to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20110215-320401/Ombudsman-impeach-case-get-SC-green-light
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110303085249/http://www8.gmanews.tv/story/214141/ombudsman-appeals-sc-ruling-on-impeachment-case to http://www8.gmanews.tv/story/214141/ombudsman-appeals-sc-ruling-on-impeachment-case
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 14 June 2017 (UTC)