Talk:155 mm gun M1

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Shell (projectile)#High-explosive|HE]] Anchor Shell (projectile)#High-explosive links to a specific web page: High explosive. The anchor (#High-explosive) has been deleted by other users before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Untitled

A World War II veteran , that died two weeks ago, told me, some years ago, that this weapon was amazing:precise, reliable, long range and available in great numbers.He used it in Italy, between 1944 and 1945.Agre22 (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Development: Why remove link to Westervelt Board ?

I added a link to the army's page for General Westervelt which includes a few sentences on the army's review of its artillery. The (155 mm gun M1) article still says the M1's development was influenced by the "Westervelt Board" (named in his honor). So why remove the link and claim it is "Not an appropriate link". W102102 (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]