13th Missouri Cavalry Regiment (Confederate) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hi Hog Farm, review follows: article moved to mainspace 19 December, some of the background content was copied from another article but this is attributed in the history and new content is in excess of the minimum requirement; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I've only got access to limited Google previews but noticed no overly close paraphrasing in a spot check on these; hooks are interesting, ALT1 is mentioned in the article and supported by the source; ALT0, I think needs a little tweak; the source and article both seem to state that the guns were referred to as "flying artillery", not the unit? a QPQ has been carried out - Dumelow (talk) 08:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hog Farm, review follows: article moved to mainspace 19 December, some of the background content was copied from another article but this is attributed in the history and new content is in excess of the minimum requirement; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I've only got access to limited Google previews but noticed no overly close paraphrasing in a spot check on these; hooks are interesting, ALT1 is mentioned in the article and supported by the source; ALT0, I think needs a little tweak; the source and article both seem to state that the guns were referred to as "flying artillery", not the unit? a QPQ has been carried out - Dumelow (talk) 08:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hog Farm: looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 23:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
