Talk:1159 papal election
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1159 papal election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 1159 papal election has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 27, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the papal election in 1159 that followed the death of Pope Adrian IV resulted in a papal schism, which lasted until 1178? | |||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 7, 2017, September 7, 2018, September 7, 2021, and September 7, 2023. |
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Papal election, 1159/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Have performed a minor copyedit to remove MoS. The lead need to be extended considerably, probably fivefold. Remember to mention all parts of the article; the lead is to summarize, not introduce, the article.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- The bibliography section should cite books within {{cite book}}. All-caps titles should be converted to lower caps—all caps is a matter of typography and not grammar or spelling. The first paragraph under "Death of Adrian IV" should be referenced. Ref 25 and 35 should be in the {{cite web}} template.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Placing on hold until the addressed matters have been seen to. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to express them here. Arsenikk (talk) 15:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
I think it's all done now. CarlosPn 22 Oct 2008 15:35 CET
- Congratulations with a Good Article! Arsenikk (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- GA-Class European Microstates articles
- Unknown-importance European Microstates articles
- GA-Class Vatican City articles
- High-importance Vatican City articles
- Vatican City articles
- WikiProject European Microstates articles
- GA-Class Catholicism articles
- Mid-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Philosophy and religion good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles