Talk:10th millennium BC in North American history
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objection to proposed deletion
[edit]A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases." Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- The article is very badly written, using the first hand hand plural and completely unsourced. Concur the five phase approach does presume that everywhere in North America went through the same stages at the same time, which clearly is a simplification. Given these article are only stubs, in my honest opinion, developing the geographically-specific phase articles would be preferable. However, this was only a proposed deletion, accordingly, thanks for giving an explanation. Addhoc 18:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- NA-Class Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Low-importance Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- NA-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- NA-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Redirect-Class North America articles
- NA-importance North America articles
- WikiProject North America articles
- NA-Class Archaeology articles
- NA-importance Archaeology articles