Talk:Hazel Guggenheim McKinley
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:(Barbara) Hazel Guggenheim King-Farlow McKinley)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | On 3 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from (Barbara) Hazel Guggenheim King-Farlow McKinley to Hazel Guggenheim McKinley. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 3 February 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
(Barbara) Hazel Guggenheim King-Farlow McKinley → Hazel Guggenheim McKinley – This woman was married multiple times in her life. This article is a trainwreck in all respects, including the title. However, her local and national obituaries called her "Hazel Guggenheim McKinley", so I would hazard a guess that this should be the title instead of this awkward parenthetical. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Women has been notified of this discussion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Rarely have I seen such an awful title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support weird naming convention on this article. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 07:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.