Talk:Ōkatana

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Japanese

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Japan

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:40, December 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Redundant / plain wrong

"太" isn't "ō", and "太刀" is pronounced "tachi". There's already an article: tachi.

This article (the "Ōkatana" one, I mean) shouldn't even exist, really. 88.161.129.43 (talk) 23:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with the above. The combination of kanji "Ō" and "katana" is "大刀", but that is read "taitou"/"daitou" (often missread as "Daikatana", for which there is already an article: Daikatana (sword)). So, delete or merge with tachi? --Hecko (talk) 01:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't much to merge... And I really don't know where that "ōkatana" reading comes from, so I'm not sure it's notable enough to be mentioned in the tachi article. I'm all for the deletion of this article, myself. 88.161.129.43 (talk) 02:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely no factual basis for this article. It has no place in an encyclopaedia. "Oh-katana" is neither a Japanese word nor a type of sword. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.84.237 (talk) 00:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]