Talk:Élan vital

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Libido#Analytical psychology|libido]] The anchor (#Analytical psychology) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

.

I've been reading Bergson and this account of elan vital is wholly inadequate. In his last book, Two Sources of Morality and Religion, he rebuts the misconception that elan vital is being offered as an "explanation" for life, and gives a nuanced but perfectly intelligible explanation of why he developed the idea. I guess the shortest way of putting it is that elan vital stands in for what the scientific / mechanistic explanations for life given in his era failed to account for. It isn't an explanation, but a reminder of the limits of our current explanations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.172.149 (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, some better gloss of that should be included in the article, sure. — LlywelynII 21:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I'm not getting how an idea conceived in the late 19th-early 20th century was the inspiration for Mary Shelley's novel written in 1818?! Perhaps I'm missing something... Gotterfunken 23:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The idea was conceived before prehistory. — LlywelynII 21:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Huxley quote

The quotation doesn't show he took the theory seriously - it certainly demonstrates that he was aware of it, but he's using it metaphorically, not scientifically. Pseudomonas_(talk) 09:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTH?

The idea of a "vital force" was around long before 1907. I think Aristotle came up with it and it was believed well into the age of modern science. I have no idea why a search for vital force led me here. --The Radio Star 21:13, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English use of the French name for "vital force" is usually this guy, but the 'historical overview' is a bit ridiculous. It's the entire idea behind animism and basic building blocks of human culture and language like our general concepts of spirit/soul/thing-that-makes-animals-different-from-rocks.

More to the point, whatever makes this guy's idea different from default animism or belief in qi/the Force/etc. should be clarified in the article. — LlywelynII 21:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Vital force" is translated by "detractors"?

I checked the source at the end of the first paragraph (The Philosophy Book), "élan vital is usually translated by his detractors as 'vital force'" isn't mentioned anywhere, and a quick search yields nothing. If anyone can find a realiable source please add it, thanks. Winston (talk) 01:56, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]