Talk:Ácido Argentino
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page created
[edit]Page created. Added front and back covers. Elchafa 23:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Hermetica-Acido Argentino-Trasera.jpg
[edit]Image:Hermetica-Acido Argentino-Trasera.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Hermetica-Acido Argentino-Frontal.jpg
[edit]Image:Hermetica-Acido Argentino-Frontal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]
- ... that Rolling Stone listed Ácido Argentino as the best album of Argentine heavy metal?
- Source: "Los 40 discos esenciales del metal argentino" [The essential 40 albums of Argentine metal] (in Spanish). Rolling Stone. May 16, 2024. Retrieved July 25, 2024.
Cambalachero (talk) 19:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC).
- Reviewing... Flibirigit (talk) 00:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough: - ?
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - ?
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The article was expanded from 469 to 3169 characters of readable prose from July 23 to 25, and nominated on July 25. The length of the prose section is adequate, however the introduction is too short and makes the nomination look like a work in progress, as per WP:DYKCRIT. A better introduction will have at least two sentences summarizing the background and recording, and one sentence for the reception. The track listing is unsourced, and as per WP:RATEYOURMUSIC, a better source is needed that is not WP:DEPRECATED. The article is neutral in tone, and no plagiarism was detected. The hook is interesting to a broad audience, properly mentioned and cited in the article, and verified by the source in Spanish. The album cover image has an appropriate non-free license. The QPQ requirement is complete. Flibirigit (talk) 00:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done. The track list does need references, no album article asks for that, not even featured ones. As for the personell, the album itself should be an acceptable primary source per WP:PRIMARY. Cambalachero (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have posed the question at WT:DYK with respect to citations for the track listing and personnel. Let's see what the consensus is. Otherwise, I see no concerns here. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fairly sure the tracklisting and personnel come under WP:PLOTSOURCE, although this does need a copyedit. WP:DYKRR says "only full reviews with no reliable predecessors count as a QPQ" and that nomination did have one - does it count?--Launchballer 14:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- That nomination needed a full review at that point (it was not a passing by comment). I can make a new review if needed, but in a couple of days, I'm out og town right now Cambalachero (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- My reading of WP:PLOTSOURCE is that it does not in fact apply to track listings and personnel. For one thing, it's explicitly talking about plot sections, and I really don't think either count as plot or even match the spirit of the guideline. Although one can assume good faith that the track listings and personnel are cited to the CD itself, it's always safe to make that clear especially to those who many not access to it. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fairly sure the tracklisting and personnel come under WP:PLOTSOURCE, although this does need a copyedit. WP:DYKRR says "only full reviews with no reliable predecessors count as a QPQ" and that nomination did have one - does it count?--Launchballer 14:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- Stub-Class Argentine articles
- Unknown-importance Argentine articles
- WikiProject Argentina articles
- Stub-Class Latin music articles
- Low-importance Latin music articles
- Latin music articles
- Stub-Class Heavy Metal articles
- WikiProject Metal articles
- Articles that have been nominated for Did you know