Jump to content

Talk:'03 Bonnie & Clyde

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article'03 Bonnie & Clyde has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 3, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
January 29, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Chart data is all wrong

[edit]

Anyone wanna fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.11.140.87 (talk) 02:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move Parsecboy (talk) 21:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Bonnie & Clyde (song)'03 Bonnie & Clyde — The song is simply named "'03 Bonnie & Clyde" and not "Bonnie & Clyde". That's how it was released on The Blueprint²: The Gift & the Curse and Dangerously in Love and that's how it was released as a single. "'03 Bonnie & Clyde" is the named used by MTV and much of the press, thus making the most common name. There is no reason in my mind for why this page is titled the way it is. — Do U(knome)? yes...or no 05:57, 11 December 2008 (UTC) *Also, I think there might be something wrong with {{RMlink}}. — Do U(knome)? yes...or no 06:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:
  • Wondering too, very generic. In my past researches of Miss Knowles, I have never read or met only "Bonnie & Clyde". Virtually all sources use the entire song title. Maybe we should invite the user who moved the page? --Efe (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was the one who moved the page, dropping the '03. On releases like The Beyoncé Experience Live!, the title of the song is simply "Bonnie & Clyde". And this isn't the first instance of this, although I'm not sure about Jay-Z but Beyoncé has had the song written without the '03 on other Japan releases. Ratizi1 (talk) 03:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the correct track listing does include "'03". And nonetheless, this hardly matters as the song is best known by English readers as "'03 Bonnie & Clyde", as per WP:NC. The song charted across the globe under that name, and I'm sure that a video album and some Japanese releases won't change this. — Do U(knome)? yes...or no 08:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to change it back if you feel it better reflects the song. Ratizi1 (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, do we all agree on this? — Do U(knome)? yes...or no 03:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much. Yeah. Ratizi1 (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:'03 Bonnie & Clyde/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 17:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outsider comment - I'm copy editing the article and am almost finished. I'll leave an update when I'm done so that you can start reviewing. Thanks. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 17:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OKay. Calvin Watch n' Learn 17:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Calvin and Jivesh, I've done my copy edit. There may be some rough patches that can be addressed during the review. Jivesh, please have a look at my edit summaries and "<!-- hidden comments -->" before anything. Sourcing and prose clarity may be an issue. Thanks. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see any "<!-- hidden comments -->" in the article so I assume those points have been addressed? Calvin Watch n' Learn 13:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They have. But the year-end charts are being added. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's happening here? There hasn't been any activity on this page for over a week and the review appears to be in limbo. —Andrewstalk 09:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Info box

[edit]
  • Add {{Start date|2002|09|10}} template.
  • Add {{Duration|m=3|s=25}} template.

Lead

[edit]
  • "It is based on" → Not the correct saying here.
  • ""'03 Bonnie & Clyde" was received generally with favorable reviews by contemporary music critics" → Over complicated. Change to ""'03 Bonnie & Clyde" was generally well received by music critics" and link music critics :P
  • "their collaboration" → Isn't this the same as saying "the combination of Jay-Z's and Knowles' musical styles"? Seems a bit unneeded to me.
  • "and reached genrally the top 20 in other European territories." → "And reached generally"? It either did or it didn't. Omit "generally".
  • "It as nominated" → Typo.

Production and release

[edit]
  • "West told MTV News that Jay-Z had asked him on the telephone for a joint for him and Knowles:" → What does joint mean? It sounds like something to do with drugs.
  • I think you should use {{" '}} because it currently looks like a triple quotation mark. Do this article wide.
  • "Tensions arose during the conception of "'03 Bonnie & Clyde" over the sampling of "Me and My Girlfriend.[4] Senior Vice President of A&R Tina Davis commented on the issue, "We only had one day to clear the [Tupac Shakur] sample [from 'Me and my Girlfriend'] that was used on 03 Bonnie and Clyde' last year with Jay-Z and Beyoncé [Knowles]. We were back and forth with Afeni Shakur all day until we got the clearance. And then it's a hit."[4]" → You jump straight into this, I was confused in the first sentence over why.
  • "Their relationship was not made public until both artists would collaborate on "Crazy In Love" (2003) and "Déjà Vu" (2006).[1]" → "Their relationship was not made public until Jay-Z featured on Knowles' song's "Crazy In Love" (2003) and "Déjà Vu" (2006).[1]" and link Crazy in Love and Deja Vu.
  • "The latter's release also marked the debut of the solo career of Knowles, leaving Destiny's Child on hiatus.[2]" → Irrelevant. This is not about DC.

Composition

[edit]
  • "Ethan Brown of New York magazine noted that its patina of flamenco guitar was reminiscent of that in Jay-Z's 2001 collaboration with R. Kelly on "Fiesta."" → Could you try and put a comma somewhere? It's quite long.
  • "Knowles mimics the hook on the chorus as she sings, "Down to ride to the very end, me and my boyfriend"." → What do you mean? How do we know she mimics if we can't see her?

Critical reception

[edit]
  • "who commended the use of different samples, and commented on the relationship between Jay-Z and Knowles." → Repetitive

Chart performance

[edit]
  • "entered the top ten on music charts in six European countries." → Do you mean debuted? Or entered after a certain amount of time?
  • "it became the highest-charting single that references the famous bank robbers Bonnie and Clyde." → Source?
  • "tying him with rapper P. Diddy." → for...?

Music video

[edit]
  • Aston Martin needs a source. It's a brand.

Toni Braxton feud

[edit]
  • "and her camp" → Re-word.
  • "sent a statement" → Where? To Jay?
Fixed both. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formats and track listings

[edit]

Credits and personnel

[edit]
Oops. Removed. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charts and certifications

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • FN10 and FN17 have a double full stop (..)

Summary

[edit]

Only a few points to address, other than that, on hold. :) Aaron You Da One 13:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. Aaron You Da One 13:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on '03 Bonnie & Clyde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on '03 Bonnie & Clyde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on '03 Bonnie & Clyde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]