Talk:George Rabasa: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:15, 14 March 2010

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 }}
+)
-== Article issues ==
-Further explanation at: [[Wikipedia:New contributors' help page#George Rabasa]] and at [[User talk:James Cihlar#George Rabasa]].&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 22:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-:I trimmed the lead paragraph and removed the reviews section, to bring this article more in line with most other articles about individual novelists.  '''[[User:Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Soap|<font color="057602">''Soap''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]]''' 02:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
-::The current tags are IMO generally warranted. Specifically:
-::*Advertisement: The "reviews" of a type and tone that sound like blurb-quotes to be found on the cover of a book for sale, justified the "advertisement" tag when it was placed. The summeries in the "Novels" section that remain in the article also sound like blurbs, for example "Adam Webb narrates this novel of young love gone bad, exploring his infatuation with Francine Haggard, Ms. Entropia, and its descent into obsession and tragedy." Some are also uncited and therefore at least arguably represent [[WP:OR|original research]].
-::*Peacock terms: "The Cleansing features evocative description of the drug-influenced, socially experimental, and politically corrupt era of mid- to late-century Mexico City." is an example, particularly "evocative". "run the gamut of modern obsessions" and "slyly twisting them into surreal and prescient fables" are also examples. However the remaining pecock terms can IMO be fairly easily eliminated.
-::*References: Pages of vendor sites, such as Amazon are generally not considered independent and are discouraged if the same info is available from other sites, such as [[OCLC]]. Amazon in particular is notoriously unreliable about certain facts, such as publication dates and page counts. it is also unreliable about publisher names for older works, although usually accurate for current works. Interviews with the subject and the subjects web site are also not independent and may not be reliable. The same applies to publisher sites. However, discounting all those there does seem to be a number of cited references, and i'm not sure if this tag really holds up at present. But far too many of the current refs are to sources not independent of the subject.
-::*A "Critical response" section would be good, but it should cite published independent reviews directly, and quote relevant conclusions, not the sort of "a word here ... and a word there ... and a good thought over here" style often used by publisher's blurbs. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 02:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
-The tags should be removed for this article.--[[User:James Cihlar|James Cihlar]] ([[User talk:James Cihlar|talk]]) 05:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
-:Minor awards shouldn't be in the article. That does make it look like advertising. I've also removed the Amazon links, we shouldn't be linking to specific sales sites. I agree with DES. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 09:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)