Talk:Amazon basin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:34, 14 May 2009

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ecuador Mid‑importance

	Ecuador portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Peru

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Brazil Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WP1.0

(No subject)

"article starts to read as antibrazil" merge with Amazon River? dab 08:40, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

- I vote yes. Dralwik 01:19, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Brazilian Amazon?

I noticed that this article only refers to Brazil. In that intentional? Guettarda 16:00, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) Yes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.5.228.66 (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

geography or history

"But waz up over the past 30 years the Brazilian government has transformed Amazonia into factory sites and settlements by sponsoring road projects, colonization schemes, and industrial developments."

This seems more about history than geography. Also is sounds like a political statement against the Brazilian government policy in the region, and in my opinion should be deleted. 212.201.75.4 16:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I came to the discussion page just to see if there was an explanation for that. 201.27.14.89 00:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the Amazon rain forest, the name "Olivia" is quite common. It is the most popular name in South America. 71.234.79.112 21:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC) first, this goes in talk, it was on the bottom of the article. second, where did u get that? olivia isnt, by far, the common name in south america nd i can think a lot of more names.--ometzit<col> 22:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid that the text contains more errors. The author is, I suspect unaware of new archeological findings and discussion about whether or not the different tribes had their own writingsystem. Inca's where not the only kingdom (scientific debate) who thrived here. It seems to me he/she is hanging on to popular believes. In this case I would suggest to stick to general information and leave the serious parts up to the people who'd know.--Glynn71 11:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

plant life

Why just put "nobody knows?" either say something, or remove the section. this is not enough!! anyone noes types of homes ??????/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.240.20 (talk) 07:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed

This certainly needs a citation: Scientists from respected institutions and NASA have produced scientific evidence that... Nazroon 06:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling / Grammar

People who agree that it is rainy is gay! That's what it means!

WORLD BANK

Did Brazil give the property rights of the amazon river basin to the world bank as a foreclosure on the loan they took out?

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 == Spelling / Grammar ==
-People wo agree that it is rainy is gay!that's wat it means!
+People who agree that it is rainy is gay! That's what it means!
 == WORLD BANK ==