Jump to content

Talk:? (2011 film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Sean McHugh - ""
→‎April Fool's?: new section
Line 50: Line 50:


*I'm very much glad everyone's enjoying this. {{P}} — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 07:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
*I'm very much glad everyone's enjoying this. {{P}} — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 07:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

== April Fool's? ==

hahaha

Revision as of 11:23, 1 April 2013

Featured article? (2011 film) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 1, 2013.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 19, 2011Good article nomineeListed
June 19, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
August 18, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 1, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... ?
Current status: Featured article

Template:Maintained

WHAT THE HELL IS THIS STUPID QUESTION MARK SUPPOSED TO BE? IS EVEN WIKIPEDIA DECENDING INTO DRIVEL AND GARBAGE? THE HELL WITH YOU THUGS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean McHugh (talkcontribs) 10:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

The article says that it will compete in the Indonesian Film Festival in October. An article used as a source says the winners will be announced November 27.[1] What happened? Did it win anyhing? MathewTownsend (talk) 01:39, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:? (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 18:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC) Hi, I will start this review shortly.[reply]

Review notes
  • This is a very interesting film. I have a few comments below. All in all I see no great problems. I'm really impressed that the sources are archived!
  • I did some copy editing and feel free to change anything you don't agree with.
  • The plot section was very hard to understand and I think it could be expanded just a little for clarity. It was difficult to keep track of who was who. I think a "Cast" section would be helpful for the reader to be able to refer to.
 Done Linked all.
  • "since she converted" - from what
 Done - From Islam. I thought it was implied as her son was Muslim, but no harm in making it clearer.
  • Why is Abi ostracized?
 Done - Because the neighbours disapprove of his mother.
  • "he dies when suicide bombing a church when Menuk rejects him." - don't understand this.
 Done
  • For a person not completely familiar with the relationships among the three religions mentioned, some links or brief explanations would help.
Like a background section?
  • Production
  • Is there any information about the writing of the screenplay?
  • None has been forthcoming online from what I can see. I've been dying to get the DVD if / when it comes out for more background information.
  • Any information about casting choices, where filmed and other production issues?
  • "Its release coincided with a contest sponsored by a local cellular provider to give the best name to the events shown in the film." - I'm not sure what giving "the best name to the events shown in the film" means. What were the results?
  • "Accolades"
  • Is "Accolades" the best title for this section?
  •  Done Changed to awards
  • "As of October 2011, ? is slated to compete in the 2011" - this needs updating, as the results were to be announced November 27.
  •  Done
  • "Controversy"
  • "The youth group Banser, part of NU" - what is NU? What is Banser besides a youth group - what kind of youth group?

Please feel free to contact me and/or ask questions and provide feedback.

MathewTownsend (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A few more
  • I don't mean a "background" section on religion, just a little more explanation of how religion and society interact there.
  • e.g. why is Abi ostracized? Isn't being Muslim ok there? Or is it because of his mother being Catholic?
  • Also, when Hendra decides the restaurant will serve exclusively pork, no more is said on that issue. Didn't that have some effects?
  • Surya receives an offer from Rika to play the role of Jesus at her church's Christmas pageant, which he accepts for a high fee after hesitating - does he hesitate because he'll be playing a Christian role? And the "high fee", what is the significance of that? (He's a "ne'er-do-well Muslim actor", so does getting this job make him ok?)
Other things
  • Hendra comes into conflict with Soleh over Menuk, as Hendra had previously dated her. Menuk becomes increasingly depressed after Soleh tells her that he plans to divorce her. - (but then) - Eventually, Soleh joins the Islamic group Nahdlatul Ulama, enabling him to feel more confident; however, after Menuk refuses to take him back ... (I thought he was the one who wanted to divorce her. Did he want the divorce because he lacked self confidence?)
  • Reply - I think just a little more explanation in the plot. Nothing elaborate - just the things I mentioned. Since religious conflict drives the plot, it would help if were clear how it does. I know about the three major religions mentioned, but I don't know how they interact in Indonesia. That's all. MathewTownsend (talk) 00:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps a little too much background. How about:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Best Featured Article Ever

I LOVE the lead for this article as today's featured article! Absolutely great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.92.199.90 (talk) 02:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly made me click through.
--Cogniac (talk) 03:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Me too, although it looked like a browser error. 50.39.110.236 (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I liked the lead too; it made me click as well. :) —Lowellian (reply) 03:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April Fool's?

hahaha