Jump to content

Santiago Principles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Santiago Principles or formally the Sovereign Wealth Funds: Generally Accepted Principles and Practices (GAPP)[1] are designed as a common global set of 24 voluntary guidelines that assign best practices for the operations of Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs).[2][3][4][5][6] They are a consequence of the concern of investors and regulators to establish management principles addressing the inadequate transparency, independence, and governance in the industry. They are guidelines to be followed by sovereign wealth fund management to maintain a stable global financial system, proper controls around risk, regulation and a sound governance structure.[7]

As of 2016 30[8] funds have formally signed up to the Principles and joined the IFSWF representing collectively 80% of assets managed by sovereign funds globally or US$5.5 trillion.[9]

The principles are maintained and promoted by the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds (IFSWF)[10][1] and whose membership have to either have implemented or aspire to implement the principles.[11]

History

[edit]

In 2008, there was growing concern by investors and regulators about SWFs, partially about their visibility, accountability, and governance structure. To address these concerns, a joint effort between the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the "International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds" (IWG-SWF) which represented the coming together of 14 principle funds including some of the largest,[8] such as GIC Private Limited and Abu Dhabi Investment Authority.[12] The IWG-SWF then drafted the 24 Santiago Principles, to set out common international standards regarding transparency, independence, and governance which SWFs might follow. These were made public after being presented to the IMF International Monetary Financial Committee on 11 October 2008.[2]

The working group was then replaced by a permanent body on the 6 April 2009, the "International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds" to maintain and promote the new standards going forward and encourage other sovereign wealth fund to sign up.[10][13]

Natural resource-rich developing economies are typically encouraged to adopt good governance standards for sovereign wealth funds, such as the Santiago Principles, which emphasize transparency, accountability, and sound investment practices. This approach is often preferred over local content policies, which can foster corruption and rent-seeking behavior in contexts with weak governance.[14]

Overview

[edit]

According to the IFSWF, the creation of the Santiago Principles was driven by the following goals for SWFs:[7][13][11]

24 principles

[edit]

The Santiago Principles state that SWFs need to have the following:[1][2][3]

  1. A sound legal framework,
  2. A well-defined mission,
  3. Domestic activities coordinated with fiscal and monetary authorities,
  4. Clearly defined rules for drawdowns,
  5. Transparency to the owner,
  6. Clear division of roles,
  7. Governing bodies appointed in a predetermined manner,
  8. Governing bodies that act in the best interest of the SWF,
  9. Independence,
  10. Formal definition of accountability,
  11. Annual reporting,
  12. Independent auditors,
  13. Ethics and professionalism,
  14. Rules-based outsourcing,
  15. Ability to abide by rules of foreign countries,
  16. Operational independence from the owner,
  17. Public transparency,
  18. Clear investment policies,
  19. Commercial orientation,
  20. Restrictions against using privileged information,
  21. Shareholder rights policies,
  22. Effective risk management,
  23. Proper reporting of performance,
  24. And regular reviews to ensure its compliance with the foregoing Santiago Principles.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c "The Santiago Principles: In 150 Words Or Less!". Institutional Investor. 2013-04-03. Retrieved 2016-10-22.
  2. ^ a b c International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds. "Santiago Principles". Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  3. ^ a b "Sovereign Wealth Funds: Generally Accepted Principles and Practices (Santiago Principles)" (PDF). International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds. October 2008. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  4. ^ Simon Willson (2008-10-15). "IMF Survey: Wealth Funds Group Publishes 24-Point Voluntary Principles". IMF. Retrieved 2016-10-22.
  5. ^ "KIA's Implementation of the Santiago Principles" (PDF). Kuwait Investment Authority. Retrieved 2016-10-22.
  6. ^ Sven Behrendt (May 2010). "Sovereign Wealth Funds and the Santiago Principles - Where Do They Stand?" (PDF). carnegieendowment.org. Retrieved 2016-10-22.
  7. ^ a b International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds. "IFSWF Santiago Principles". Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  8. ^ a b International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds. "Our Members". Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  9. ^ Hedge Fund Standards Board (4 April 2016). "International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds (IFSWF) and Hedge Fund Standards Board (HFSB) establish Mutual Observer relationship". Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  10. ^ a b International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds. "About us". Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  11. ^ a b "What are the Santiago Principles?". Chile Ministry of Finance. Retrieved 2024-06-21.
  12. ^ "Santiago Principles". Gic.com.sg. Retrieved 2016-10-22.
  13. ^ a b International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds. "Kuwait Declaration". Retrieved 29 September 2016.
  14. ^ Bold Sandagdorj and Enerelt Enkhbold, "Do Local Producers Contribute to Mongolia’s Mining Supply Chain?" ADB Briefs no. 326, 2024. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/BRF240565-2
[edit]