Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n

Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n
Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n
	Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 10, 2020
Full case name	Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n
Docket no.	18-540
Citations	592 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
	State statutes are only preempted by ERISA if they have an "impermissible connection" to ERISA plans or they "refer to" ERISA plans.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer; Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor; Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch; Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinions
Majority	Sotomayor, joined by unanimous
Concurrence	Thomas
Laws applied
	Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that state statutes are only preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) if they have an "impermissible connection" to ERISA plans or they "refer to" ERISA plans.^[1]^[2]

References

^ Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n, No. 18-540, 592 U.S. ___ (2020).
^ "Opinion analysis: Court rejects challenge to states' authority to regulate pharmacy reimbursements". SCOTUSblog. 2020-12-13. Retrieved 2024-12-20.

Text of Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n, No. 18-540, 592 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Justia

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.