Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano
| Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided February 24, 2020 | |
| Full case name | Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano |
| Docket no. | 18-921 |
| Citations | 589 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| A Puerto Rico trial court has no jurisdiction to issue payment and seizure orders after a pension benefits proceeding is removed to federal district court and before the proceeding is remanded back to the Puerto Rico court. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Per curiam | |
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Puerto Rico trial court has no jurisdiction to issue payment and seizure orders after a pension benefits proceeding is removed to federal district court and before the proceeding is remanded back to the Puerto Rico court.[1][2][3]
References
[edit]- ^ Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano, No. 18-921, 589 U.S. ___ (2020).
- ^ "Justices to take up case involving faith-based adoption agencies and same-sex couples". SCOTUSblog. 2020-02-24. Retrieved 2024-11-05.
- ^ "Did the Supreme Court Really Ban Nunc Pro Tunc Orders?". www.burr.com. 2020-03-06. Retrieved 2024-11-05.
External links
[edit]- Text of Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano, No. 18-921, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |