R v Dixon
Rex v. Dixon, 3 M. & S. 11 (K.B. 1814), was a case decided by the King's Bench that held that a person could not be convicted of selling impure foods unless he knew of the impurities.
Subsequent history
[edit]The case was later overruled in Regina v. Woodrow, which abolished the mens rea requirement of Rex v. Dixon.[1]
References
[edit]- ^ Bonnie, R.J. et al. Criminal Law, Second Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2004, p. 252
  | This article related to the history of England is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This article related to English law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |