Quantum weirdness
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Quantum weirdness encompasses the aspects of quantum mechanics that challenge and defy human physical intuition.[1]
Human physical intuition is based on macroscopic physical phenomena as are experienced in everyday life, which can mostly be adequately described by the Newtonian mechanics of classical physics.[2] Early 20th-century models of atomic physics, such as the Rutherford–Bohr model, represented subatomic particles as little balls occupying well-defined spatial positions, but it was soon found that the physics needed at a subatomic scale, which became known as "quantum mechanics", implies many aspects for which the models of classical physics are inadequate.[3] These aspects include: [citation needed]
- quantum entanglement;[4][5]
- quantum nonlocality, referred to by Einstein as "spooky action at a distance";[4] see also EPR paradox;
- quantum superposition, presented in dramatic form in the thought experiment known as Schrödinger's cat;[5][6]
- the uncertainty principle;[4]
- wave–particle duality;[7]
- the probabilistic nature of wave function collapse, decried by Einstein, saying, "God does not play dice".[5]
See also
[edit]- Bell's theorem
- Interpretations of quantum mechanics
- Quantum tunneling
- Renninger negative-result experiment
- Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment
References
[edit]- ^ Paul Sukys (1999). Lifting the Scientific Veil: Science Appreciation for the Nonscientist. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-8476-9600-0. p. 135:
Quantum weirdness refers to those quantum phenomena that appear to defy common experience when explained in terms of everyday life.
- ^ Ball, Philip (2018). Beyond Weird: Why Everything You Thought You Knew about Quantum Physics is Different. Bodley Head. ISBN 978-1-84792-457-5.
- ^ William J. Mullin (2017). Quantum Weirdness. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-879513-1.
- ^ a b c Lisa Grossman (November 18, 2010). "Universe's Quantum Weirdness Limits its Weirdness". Wired.
- ^ a b c Hans Christian von Baeyer (2013). "Quantum Weirdness? It's All in Your Mind". Scientific American. 308 (6): 46–51. Bibcode:2013SciAm.308f..46V. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0613-46. PMID 23729070..
- ^ Carlo Rovelli (March 10, 2021). "Quantum weirdness isn't weird – if we accept objects don't exist". New Scientist. Retrieved May 12, 2024.
- ^ Tom Siegfried (November 20, 2010). "Quantum weirdness". ScienceNews. 178 (11).
Further reading
[edit]- Book reviews
- Siegfried, Tom (6 January 2019). "'Beyond Weird' and 'What Is Real?' try to make sense of quantum weirdness". Science News.
- Boyle, Alan (January 9, 2023). "Sci-fi author and scientist team up to write a novel about consciousness and quantum weirdness". GeekWire.
- Articles
- Gardner, Martin (October 1982). "Quantum Weirdness". Discover: 69–75.
- Cho, Adrian (13 September 2005). "Outracing Quantum Weirdness". Science.
- Boyd, R. W.; Chan, Kam Wai Clifford; O'Sullivan, Malcolm N. (28 September 2007). "Physics. Quantum weirdness in the lab". Science. 317 (5846): 1874–5. doi:10.1126/science.1148947. PMID 17901320.
- d'Espagnat, Bernard (20 March 2009). "Quantum weirdness: What We Call 'Reality' is Just a State of Mind". The Guardian.
- Musser, George (19 January 2016). "Quantum Weirdness Now a Matter of Time". Quanta Magazine.
- Ananthaswamy, Anil (19 February 2016). "Quantum weirdness may hide an orderly reality after all". New Scientist.
- Wolchover, Natalie (7 February 2017). "Experiment Reaffirms Quantum Weirdness". Quanta Magazine.
- Wolchover, Natalie (11 October 2018). "Famous Experiment Dooms Alternative to Quantum Weirdness". Quanta Magazine.
- Schnabel, Roman (29 January 2020). "'Quantum Weirdness' in Exploitation by the International Gravitational-Wave Observatory Network". Annalen der Physik. 532 (3): 1900508. arXiv:1909.13723. doi:10.1002/andp.201900508.
 | This quantum mechanics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |