This page is part of WikiProject Current events, an attempt to expand and better organize information in articles related to current events. If you would like to participate in the project, visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.Current eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Current eventsTemplate:WikiProject Current eventsCurrent events articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The following is my original edit, which was removed because of "synthesis".
I disagree that a third party source (yahoo) is better than the actual Russian law itself, but I have added an edit below. Please add it. It is very pertinent. I request that you investigate why this is being removed from Wikipedia.
The actual source for the material cited is Ukrainska Pravda - see the relevant section on Yahoo at WP:RSNP: Yahoo! News runs both original reporting and syndicated feeds of other sources. Editors have treated the original reporting as an ordinary WP:NEWSORG, and thus presumed generally reliable. Take care with syndicated content, which varies from highly reliable sources to very unreliable sources. Syndicated content should be evaluated as you would evaluate the original source. Syndicated content will have the original source's name and/or logo at the top. Under the circumstances, I'd have to suggest that a better source would be needed. If this is seen to be of significance, independent mainstream media are going to comment on it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It should probably be noted that the Ukrainska Pravda piece is more than a little ambiguous as to what the law actually says. I don't think it supports the above claim that it "prohibits investigations" in general. It seems to be saying that official 'technical investigations' won't occur. And from an (obviously WP:OR) look at the law itself, via Google translate, this seems to be the focus of the legislation - regulation of such a broader category of official investigations in Russian-occupied territory. One could speculate as to why the Russians find such legislation necessary, but that isn't Wikipedia's job. Leave that to uninvolved secondary sources. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Continuing with the side-note on Ukrainska Pravda, this seems to further suggest that it is a reliable source in the Wikipedia sense. However, that's only a single source. I'd like to see wider coverage of this before adding this topic to the article. — The Anome (talk) 11:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: discussion is ongoing and better sources are probably needed. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)