Nash-Williams theorem

In graph theory, the Nash-Williams theorem is a tree-packing theorem that describes how many edge-disjoint spanning trees (and more generally forests) a graph can have:

A graph G has t edge-disjoint spanning trees iff for every partition ${\textstyle V_{1},\ldots ,V_{k}\subset V(G)}$ where $V_{i}\neq \emptyset$ there are at least t(k − 1) crossing edges (Tutte 1961, Nash-Williams 1961).

For this article, we will say that such a graph has arboricity t or is t-arboric. (The actual definition of arboricity is slightly different and applies to forests rather than trees.)

Related tree-packing properties

A k-arboric graph is necessarily k-edge connected. The converse is not true.

As a corollary of NW, every 2k-edge connected graph is k-arboric.

Both NW and Menger's theorem characterize when a graph has k edge-disjoint paths between two vertices.

Nash-Williams theorem for forests

In 1964, Nash-Williams generalized the above result to forests:

G can be partitioned into t edge-disjoint forests iff for every $U\subset V(G)$, the induced subgraph G[U] has at most $t(|U|-1)$ edges.

A proof is given here.

This is how people usually define what it means for a graph to be t-aboric.

In other words, for every subgraph S = G[U], we have $t\geq \lceil E(S)/(V(S)-1)\rceil$. It is tight in that there is a subgraph S that saturates the inequality (or else we can choose a smaller t). This leads to the following formula

$t=\lceil \max _{S\subset G}{\frac {E(S)}{V(S)-1}}\rceil$

also referred to as the NW formula.

The general problem is to ask when a graph can be covered by edge-disjoint subgraphs.

See also

• Arboricity
• Bridge (cut edge)
• Matroid partitioning
• Menger's theorem
• Tree packing conjecture

External links

• Paulson, Lawrence C. The Nash-Williams partition theorem (Formal proof development in Isabelle/HOL, Archive of Formal Proofs)