Mlombo v Fourie
Mlombo v Fourie[1] is an important and contentious case in South African property law. It was heard before Trollip J in the Transvaal Provincial Division on May 29, 1964.
Facts
[edit]Mlombo, the owner of the property, instituted the rei vindicatio action against Fourie for having fraudulently ceased to possess it.
Judgment
[edit]The court ordered Fourie to make good the value of the lost property.
Criticism
[edit]The decision has been criticised by legal commentators for having blurred the distinction between the rei vindicatio and the actio ad exhibendum.[2][3] The rei vindicatio, or vindicatory action, is a remedy available to an owner to reclaim his property, from wherever it is found and from whosoever is holding it, entitling him to "exclusive possession."[4] The true application of the remedy is aimed merely at restoring proprietary interest; it does not include damages.[5] The actio ad exhibendum, which is a delictual remedy, usually does include a claim for damages. By awarding damages in terms of the rei vindicatio, which is a restorative proprietary remedy, the court failed to appreciate this distinction.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]Books
[edit]- PJ Badenhorst, JM Pienaar and H Mostert Silberberg and Schoeman's The Law of Property 5 ed (2006).
- H Mostert and A Pope (eds) The Principles of The Law of Property in South Africa 1 ed (2010).
Cases
[edit]- Mlombo v Fourie 1964 (3) SA 350 (T).
Notes
[edit]
 | This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |