MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist-forbidden-move
![]() | This interface message or skin may be documented on MediaWiki.org or translatewiki.net. The page forms part of the MediaWiki interface, and can only be edited by administrators and interface editors. To request a change to the page, add {{edit fully-protected}} to this page, followed by a description of your request. Consider announcing discussions you add here at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) to bring more people to the discussion. |
Quick heads up: I removed $1 (which is the actual regex itself), since leaving it in is just asking for it to be circumvented :P --slakr\ talk / 23:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Someone should check the order of $2 and $3 variables, MediaWiki has changed and makes it fuzzy. Vinhtantran (talk) 02:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 8 September 2020
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change this to
The page "$2" cannot be renamed to "$3" because the title "$3" matches an entry $1 on the local or global blacklists. If you believe that this move is valid, please consider requesting the move first. |
Reasons:
- It mentions both local and global blacklists.
- There is no way to know which blacklist entry was tripped. This is problematic when there are errors on the local or global blacklists. The extendedconfirmed-show makes sure that well-established users can always see the entry that was tripped. Aasim 00:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- [1] Aasim 20:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- I've done this but I'm not sure if it is wise to change the wording from "moved" to "renamed" because the interface uses the term "move". Shall I change this back? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- They are essentially the same thing. And please implement https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Titleblacklist-forbidden-move/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=977886910 as it stops pipes that are in the $1 parameter from breaking the message. Aasim 15:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- I don't like "renamed" here either, we should be consistent. The only thing we 'rename' are usernames. — xaosflux Talk 13:51, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- +1 for move ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- I have changed it back to "moved", and started a thread at WP:VPT to get advice on the fmbox issue. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- +1 for move ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- I don't like "renamed" here either, we should be consistent. The only thing we 'rename' are usernames. — xaosflux Talk 13:51, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- They are essentially the same thing. And please implement https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Titleblacklist-forbidden-move/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=977886910 as it stops pipes that are in the $1 parameter from breaking the message. Aasim 15:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- I've done this but I'm not sure if it is wise to change the wording from "moved" to "renamed" because the interface uses the term "move". Shall I change this back? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
I have disabled the request for now as the OP has so far declined to test his changes on the testwiki. Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Escaping a pipe character in system messages for more. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Escaping piped links edit request
[edit]![]() | This edit request to MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-forbidden-move and MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-forbidden-upload has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please implement the changes I did in the sandbox for both pages. There was concern that pipe characters would break the message if a template was used, and that still is the case. Unfortunately there is no real fix for this unless if the MediaWiki parser passed {{!}} instead of the pipe character into the message. It might be possible with a new module but this code is a quick and easy fix until such a module can be created. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 13:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC) Updated by Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 01:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Not done for now: I'd really rather prefer you/someone work on dealing with this correctly than adding two more additional workarounds of this nature. It will save me time and energy down the road. Izno (talk) 07:54, 10 November 2022 (UTC)