McNabb-Mallory rule
The McNabb-Mallory rule (sometimes referred to as just the Mallory rule) is the U.S. rule of evidence that a confession is inadmissible if obtained during an unreasonably long period of detention between arrest and initial court appearance.[1][2][3][4]
The rule was largely superseded by the broader protections provided for under the Miranda rules.
The rule opened a line of cases which referenced a unique power of the Supreme Court to exercise a supervisory power in law enforcement, evidence, and procedure in federal courts.[5]
References
[edit]- ^ McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 63 S.Ct. 608 (1943)
- ^ Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356 (1957)
- ^ Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966)
- ^ CORLEY v. UNITED STATES, 556 U.S. ___ (2009)
- ^ Amy Coney Barrett. “The Supervisory Power of the Supreme Court.” Columbia Law Review, vol. 106, no. 2, 2006, pp. 324–87. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4099494. Accessed 18 Nov. 2023.