Maracich v. Spears
| Maracich v. Spears | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided June 17, 2013 | |
| Full case name | Maracich v. Spears |
| Docket no. | 12-25 |
| Citations | 570 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| An attorney's solicitation of clients is not a permissible purpose covered by the "litigation exception" to the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kennedy |
| Dissent | Ginsburg, joined by Scalia, Sotomayor, Kagan |
| Laws applied | |
| Driver's Privacy Protection Act | |
Maracich v. Spears, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an attorney's solicitation of clients is not a permissible purpose covered by the "litigation exception" to the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act.[1][2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |