Manrique v. United States

Manrique v. United States
Manrique v. United States
	Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 19, 2017
Full case name	Manrique v. United States
Docket no.	15-7250
Citations	581 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
	A defendant wishing to appeal an order imposing restitution in a deferred restitution case must file a notice of appeal from that order.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas; Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer; Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor; Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinions
Majority	Thomas
Dissent	Ginsburg, joined by Sotomayor
	Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Manrique v. United States, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a defendant wishing to appeal an order imposing restitution in a deferred restitution case must file a notice of appeal from that order.^[1]^[2]

References

^ Manrique v. United States, No. 15-7250, 581 U.S. ___ (2017).
^ "Opinion analysis: Justices require notice of appeal from deferred restitution judgments". SCOTUSblog. 2017-04-19. Retrieved 2024-12-04.

External links

Text of Manrique v. United States, No. 15-7250, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[case-1] Manrique v. United States, No. 15-7250, 581 U.S. ___ (2017).

[2] "Opinion analysis: Justices require notice of appeal from deferred restitution judgments". SCOTUSblog. 2017-04-19. Retrieved 2024-12-04.

[1]

[2]