Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 599642278 by 69.117.92.188 (talk) vandalism |
Daveroxs12 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Infobox aircraft occurrence |
{{Infobox aircraft occurrence |
||
| name = Malaysia Airlines MH370 |
| name = Malaysia Airlines MH370 |
||
| occurrence_type = Missing aircraft |
| occurrence_type = Missing aircraft, found 3/15/14 |
||
| image = Boeing 777-200ER Malaysia AL (MAS) 9M-MRO - MSN 28420 404 (9272090094).jpg |
| image = Boeing 777-200ER Malaysia AL (MAS) 9M-MRO - MSN 28420 404 (9272090094).jpg |
||
| caption = 9M-MRO, the aircraft involved in the incident, at [[Charles de Gaulle Airport]] in 2011 |
| caption = 9M-MRO, the aircraft involved in the incident, at [[Charles de Gaulle Airport]] in 2011 |
Revision as of 22:24, 14 March 2014
This article documents a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The latest updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. (March 2014) |
Missing aircraft, found 3/15/14 | |
---|---|
Date | 8 March 2014 | , 3900 days ago
Summary | Missing |
Site | Last known position 6°55′15″N 103°34′43″E / 6.92083°N 103.57861°E |
Aircraft | |
Aircraft type | Boeing 777-200ER |
Operator | Malaysia Airlines |
Registration | 9M-MRO |
Flight origin | Kuala Lumpur International Airport |
Destination | Beijing Capital International Airport |
Passengers | 227 |
Crew | 12 |
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (MH370/MAS370), also marketed as China Southern Airlines Flight 748 (CZ748) through a codeshare, was a scheduled passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing, China. On 8 March 2014, the Boeing 777-200ER aircraft operated by Malaysia Airlines disappeared in flight. It was carrying 12 crew members and 227 passengers from 15 countries. The aircraft last made contact with air traffic control less than an hour after take-off.
A joint search-and-rescue effort covering an area of 27,000 square nautical miles (93,000 square kilometres; 36,000 square miles) in the Strait of Malacca and the South China Sea[1][2] is being conducted by more than 12 countries. Vietnam briefly reduced its efforts on 11 March, but the search area continued to expand and searchers began to look for evidence on land. On 12 March, authorities also began to search the Andaman Sea, northwest of the Strait of Malacca.[3][4][5][6]
There have been several false leads.[7] US officials have said they expect the search to be extended to an area well west of the authorized flight path,[8][9] as investigators have noted evidence that the aircraft headed west back across the Malay Peninsula and remained capable of flying for hours after first disappearing from radar.[10][11] Two passengers boarded the aircraft using stolen passports, which initially raised concerns of a terrorist plot,[12] but Malaysian police subsequently identified both passengers saying they were unlikely to be terrorists.[13]
Disappearance
Flight events timeline | ||||||||||||||||
0 — – 50 — – 100 — – 150 — – 200 — – 250 — – 300 — – 350 — – 400 — | In flight route Visible in Malaysian military radar Estimated fuel range (7 hours) |
| ||||||||||||||
Known events in the first 420 minutes |
The flight departed from Kuala Lumpur International Airport on 8 March at 00:41 local time (16:41 UTC, 7 March) and was scheduled to land at Beijing Capital International Airport at 06:30 local time (22:30 UTC, 7 March). It ascended to its assigned cruise altitude of 35,000 feet (10,700 m) and was travelling at 471 knots (542 mph; 872 km/h) true airspeed when it ceased all communications and the transponder signal was lost. The aircraft's last known position (at 1:30 AM) was 6°55′15″N 103°34′43″E / 6.92083°N 103.57861°E, corresponding to the navigational waypoint IGARI, at which the aircraft was due to alter its course slightly eastward. The aircraft was also expected to contact air traffic control in Ho Chi Minh City as it passed into Vietnamese airspace just north of the point where contact was lost.[17][18] The New Straits Times reported on 9 March that the captain of another aircraft had attempted to reach the pilots of MH370 "just after 1:30 am" to relay Vietnamese Air Traffic Control's request for MH370 to contact it. The captain said he was able to establish contact but just heard "mumbling" and static.[19]
Malaysia Airlines issued a media statement at 07:24 confirming that contact had been lost at 02:40 and that search-and-rescue operations had begun.[20] It later emerged that Subang Air Traffic Control had lost contact with the aircraft at 01:22 and notified Malaysia Airlines at 02:40.[21] Neither the crew nor the aircraft's onboard communication systems relayed a distress signal, indications of bad weather, or technical problems before vanishing from radar screens.[22]
The airline reported in its eleventh press release that all of its aircraft are fitted with an Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS), a system that automatically transmits data about the status of the aircraft, but added "Nevertheless, there were no distress calls and no information was relayed."[23] When Malaysian officials were asked by a Flightglobal reporter if they had any ACARS information or not, the officials declined to comment.[24]
Subsequent communication
The New Scientist reported that prior to the aircraft's disappearance, two ACARS reports had been automatically issued to engine manufacturer Rolls-Royce's monitoring centre in the United Kingdom;[25] and a Wall Street Journal story, citing sources in the US government, said that Rolls-Royce had received an aircraft health report every thirty minutes for five hours, implying that the aircraft had remained in the air for four hours after its transponder went offline.[26] During the next day's daily press briefing, the Malaysian transport minister said details of the Wall Street Journal report were inaccurate, stating that the final engine transmission was received at 01:07, prior to the flight's disappearance from secondary radar.[26] Follow-up reporting by Reuters suggested that a cessation of engine reports did not necessarily mean there was no evidence of continued flight; the evidence may have taken the form of "pings" sent by the aircraft's maintenance troubleshooting systems. These merely indicated to satellites that it was ready to communicate, and were not reports.[27] The Wall Street Journal then corrected its story to drop references to Rolls-Royce and say that the belief of continued flight was "based on analysis of signals sent by the Boeing 777's satellite-communication link... the link operated in a kind of standby mode and sought to establish contact with a satellite or satellites. These transmissions did not include data..."[10] On 13 March the White House Press Secretary said "an additional search area may be opened in the Indian Ocean" based on "some new information"[28] and a senior official at The Pentagon told ABC News: "We have an indication the plane went down in the Indian Ocean."[9] Immarsat said only that "routine, automated signals were registered" on its network[29] although a company executive did add that "keep-alive message[s]” continued to be sent after air traffic control first lost contact and that these "ping signals" could be analyzed to help estimate the plane’s location.[30]
Search operations
Location
The search efforts generated multiple false leads. An admiral of the Vietnamese Navy reported that radar contact with the aircraft was last made over the Gulf of Thailand.[21][31] Oil slicks were located off the coast of Vietnam on 8 and 9 March and were thought to have possibly arisen from the aircraft. Test results reported on 10 March indicated that the oil slicks did not contain aviation fuel.[32][33] There were reports that a door or other fragment of the aircraft was found about 80 km (50 mi) south of Thổ Chu Island on 9 March. The following day, the Department of Civil Aviation Malaysia reported these claims were untrue; the floating material was not from an aircraft.[34]
The Royal Thai Navy shifted its focus in the search away from the Gulf of Thailand and the South China Sea at the request of its Malaysian counterpart, which was investigating the possibility that the aircraft had turned around and could have gone down in the Andaman Sea, near Thailand's border.[35] The chief of the Royal Malaysian Air Force, Rodzali Daud, claimed that military recordings of radar signals did not exclude the possibility of the aircraft turning back on its flight path.[36][37] The search radius was increased from the original 20 nautical miles (37 km; 23 mi) of its last known position,[38] south of Thổ Chu Island, to 100 nautical miles (190 km; 120 mi), and the area then covered the seas to the Strait of Malacca along the west coast of the Malay Peninsula, with waters both to the east of Malaysia in the Gulf of Thailand, and in the Strait of Malacca along Malaysia's west coast, being searched.[2][39][40]
On 11 March, it was reported that military radar indicated the aircraft had turned west and continued flying for 70 minutes before disappearing from Malaysian radar near Pulau Perak;[41][42] and that it was tracked flying at a lower altitude across Malaysia to the Malacca Strait. Its location when disappearing from radar was approximately 500 km (311 mi) from its last position in contact with air traffic control.[43] The next day Rodzali Daud denied making the statements as reported in the media, requesting that the reporting be "amended and corrected to prevent further misinterpretations of what is clearly an inaccurate and incorrect report".[44][45] According to Vietnam deputy minister of transport Pham Quy Tieu, "We informed Malaysia on the day we lost contact with the flight that we noticed the flight turned back west but Malaysia did not respond."[46] U.S. experts, assigned to assist with the investigation while maintaining a low profile that did not upstage Malaysian authorities,[47] analyzed the radar data and subsequent reporting said that the radar data did indeed indicate that the aircraft had headed west back across the Malay Peninsula.[11][48][49]
On 12 March, authorities also began to search the Andaman Sea, northwest of the Strait of Malacca, and the Malaysian government requested help from India to search in the area.[50] China released satellite images captured three days earlier that showed three floating objects measuring up to 24 by 22 metres (79 ft × 72 ft) at 6°42′N 105°38′E / 6.7°N 105.63°E.[51][52] However, no floating objects were found at the suspected crash area.[53][54] The area, according to Vietnamese officials, had been "searched thoroughly" by Vietnam and other countries but it was to be revisited.[55][56] The same day, a New Zealand man, working at the Songa Mercur oil drilling platform, claimed he had seen an aircraft "burning at high altitude ... in one piece", flying about 50 to 70 kilometres (31 to 43 mi) distant from his 8°23′N 108°42′E / 8.38°N 108.7°E location and heading between 265° and 275°, at around the time MH370 disappeared.[57] In a separate action later that day, DigitalGlobe, a satellite imaging business, released to the public all available images of the flight path[58] and search area for the public to look for and tag any images they believed might assist in the search.[59]
One aviation expert told AFP that several countries may have detected the aircraft by means of their military radar but were reluctant to share their data because it would reveal their defense capabilities.[60]
Participation
In response to the incident, the Malaysian government mobilised its civil aviation department, air force, navy, and Maritime Enforcement Agency; and requested international assistance under Five Power Defence Arrangements provisions and from neighbouring states. Various nations mounted a search and rescue mission in the region's waters.[61][62] Within two days, the countries had already dispatched more than 34 aircraft and 40 ships to the area.[2][3][40] Qatar offered assistance, and the French air-crash investigating agency, the Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la Sécurité de l'Aviation Civile (BEA), offered to help with any underwater search and recovery operation.[63][64] The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Preparatory Commission tried, but failed, to use its network of infrasound detection stations to find any sounds made by Flight 370.[65] Types of assets sent by 16 different nations include:
- Malaysia: CASA/IPTN CN-235, Beechcraft B200T King Air, Lockheed C-130 Hercules and Bombardier Global Express fixed-wing aircraft; AgustaWestland AW109 and Eurocopter EC725 helicopters.[66] Vessels from the navy and Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency.[66][67][68] Co-ordination centre at the National Disaster Control Centre (NDCC) in Pulau Meranti, Cyberjaya.[69]
- Australia: Two Royal Australian Air Force Lockheed AP-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft.[70]
- Bangladesh: Bangladesh is going to assist in tracing the missing flight MH370. Two patrol aircraft and two frigates will be engaged from March 14.[71]
- Brunei: Darussalam-class offshore patrol vessel.[72]
- China: Type 071 amphibious transport docks Kunlun Shan and Jinggang Shan, with helicopters, medical personnel, divers, and marines, life-saving and underwater detection equipment;[73] Type 052C destroyer and helicopter;[74] a Chinese Coast Guard vessel and two rescue vessels carrying divers and salvagers assembled by the Chinese Ministry of Transportation. China has also retasked ten military satellites.[75]
- India: warships and aircraft including helicopters under the Andaman and Nicobar Command's Operation Searchlight. Navy ships INS Saryu, INS Kesari and INS Kumbhir; coast guard ship ICGS Kanaklata Baruah and Dornier Do 228 fixed-wing aircraft;[76][77] air force Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules fixed-wing aircraft[78][79] and Mil Mi-17 rotary-wing aircraft; and navy Boeing P-8I and Tupolev Tu-142 maritime surveillance aircraft.[79] Rukmini naval satellite.[79][80]
- Indonesia: corvette and rapid patrol vessels;[81] PC-40 fast patrol vessels; IPTN NC-212 maritime patrol aircraft.[82]
- Japan: a disaster relief team, comprising eight Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defense, Coast Guard and International Cooperation Agency officials.[83]
- New Zealand: One Royal New Zealand Air Force Lockheed P-3K2 Orion maritime patrol aircraft from No. 5 Squadron.[84]
- Philippines: BRP Gregorio del Pilar, BRP Emilio Jacinto, BRP Apolinario Mabini; an air force Fokker F27 and a navy Britten-Norman Defender aircraft; and a navy AgustaWestland AW109 Power helicopter. A Hamilton-class cutter vessel and a C-130 Hercules placed on standby.[85][86][87][88][89]
- Singapore: Air force C-130 Hercules;[90][91] navy Formidable-class frigate with Sikorsky S-70B Seahawk helicopter; and a submarine rescue ship with divers; Victory-class corvette.[92] On the afternoon of 14 March 2014, Republic of Singapore Air Force deployed one of their Fokker 50 Maritime Patrol Aircraft to join the search.[93]
- South Korea: One P-3 Orion and a C-130 aircraft of the Republic of Korea Air Force with 39 supporting personnel.[94]
- Taiwan: air force C-130 Hercules, the frigate ROCS Tian Dan, and coast guard vessels.[95]
- Thailand: One Dornier Do 228, one AgustaWestland Super Lynx 300 helicopter and a patrol ship HTMS Pattani in Andaman Sea. Two Dornier Do 228 in Gulf of Thailand. Two other ships on standby.[96][97][98]
- United States: P-3C Orion aircraft; a P-8A Poseidon, USS Kidd, USS Pinckney with Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawk helicopters;[99][100][101] logistical vessel USNS John Ericsson;[99][102][103] a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) team.[104]
- Vietnam: Antonov An-26, CASA C-212 Aviocar, de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter, Mil Mi-171, and ships from the navy, coast guard, fisheries control, and Maritime Search & Rescue Coordination Centre.[105][106]
Intelligence sharing
Although Malaysian Transport Minister Hishammuddin Hussein denied the existence of problems between the participating countries, academics pointed out that because of regional conflicts, there were genuine trust issues involved in sharing intelligence, and that these were hampering the rescue. An academic at Singapore Management University said "The issues of protecting territory, security intelligence and interests are starting to win over the common goal of finding the plane and closure."[107] According to defence experts, giving others access to radar information may be sensitive on a military level. One suggested that some countries may already have had radar data on the plane but were reluctant to share any information that could potentially reveal their defence capabilities and compromise their own security. As an example: "The rate at which they can take the picture can also reveal how good the radar system is".[107] The Malaysian Transport Minister said his country was "releasing sensitive radar data that would normally be kept confidential".[107] Similarly, submarines patrolling the South China Sea might have information in the event of a water impact, but sharing such information could reveal the subs' locations and listening capabilities.
Aircraft
Flight 370 was operated by a Boeing 777-2H6ER,[a] serial number 28420, registration 9M-MRO. The 404th Boeing 777 produced,[109] it first flew on 14 May 2002, and was delivered new to Malaysia Airlines on 31 May 2002. The aircraft was powered by two Rolls-Royce Trent 892 engines.[109] The missing flight was at about 80% capacity, with 227 out of a possible 282 passengers (35 business, 247 economy).[110] According to the airline, it had accumulated 53,460 hours and 7,525 cycles in service.[111] 9M-MRO had not previously been involved in any major incidents;[112] a minor incident while taxiing at Shanghai Pudong International Airport in August 2012 resulted in significant damage to one of its wingtips, which broke off after striking the tail of another airliner.[113] Its last maintenance 'A' check was carried out on 23 February 2014.[111]
The Boeing 777 is generally regarded by aviation experts as having an "almost flawless" safety record,[114] one of the best of any commercial aircraft.[115] Since its first commercial flight in June 1995, there have only been two previous serious accidents. In January 2008, 47 passengers were injured when ice crystals in the fuel system of British Airways Flight 38 caused it to lose power and crash-land just short of the runway at London Heathrow Airport. In July 2013, three passengers died and 181 were injured when Asiana Airlines Flight 214 crash-landed on final approach to San Francisco International Airport.[116] Both aircraft were damaged beyond repair.[117]
In 2005 a Boeing 777-2H6ER aircraft with the registration 9M-MRG, serial number 28414, operating as Malaysia Airlines Flight 124 flying from Perth to Kuala Lumpur experienced an ADIRU (air data inertial reference unit) fault resulting in uncommanded manoeuvres by the aircraft acting on false indications.[118] In that incident the incorrect data impacted all planes of movement while the aircraft was climbing through 38,000 feet (11,600 m). The pilots recovered the aircraft and requested a return to Perth. There were no injuries and no damage to the aircraft. The ATSB (Australian Transport Safety Bureau) found that the main probable cause of this incident was a latent software error which allowed the ADIRU to use data from a failed accelerometer.[119] The US Federal Aviation Administration issued Emergency Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005-18-51 requiring all 777 operators to install upgraded software to resolve the error.[120]
Passengers and crew
Nationality | Template:Discreet abbreviation | Crew | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | 6 | 6 | |
Canada | 2 | 2 | |
China | 152 | 152 | |
France | 4 | 4 | |
Hong Kong[121] | 1 | 1 | |
India | 5 | 5 | |
Indonesia | 7 | 7 | |
Iran[b] | 2 | 2 | |
Malaysia | 38 | 12 | 50 |
Netherlands | 1 | 1 | |
New Zealand | 2 | 2 | |
Russia | 1 | 1 | |
Taiwan | 1 | 1 | |
Ukraine | 2 | 2 | |
United States | 3 | 3 | |
Total (15 nationalities) | 227 | 12 | 239 |
Malaysia Airlines released the names and nationalities of the 227 passengers and 12 crew, based on the flight manifest.[123]
Crew
All the crew members were Malaysian. The flight's captain was 53-year-old Zaharie Ahmad Shah of Penang; he joined Malaysia Airlines in 1981 and had 18,365 hours of flying experience.[124] Zaharie was also an examiner qualified to conduct simulator tests for pilots.[125] His first officer was 27-year-old Fariq Abdul Hamid, an employee of Malaysia Airlines since 2007, with 2,763 flying hours.[126][127] Fariq was transitioning to the Boeing 777-200 after having completed his simulator training.[127]
Passengers
The majority of the passengers (152 of 227) were Chinese citizens, which included a group of 19 artists with 6 family members and 4 staff, returning from a calligraphy exhibition of their work in Kuala Lumpur; 38 passengers were Malaysian. The remaining passengers came from 13 different countries.[128] Of these, 20 were employees of Freescale Semiconductor, a company based in Austin, Texas – 12 were from Malaysia and 8 from China.[129]
Malaysia Airlines sent a team of caregivers and volunteers to provide assistance towards family members of the passengers.[130] In its press releases, the carrier stated that it would bear the expenses of bringing family members of the passengers to Kuala Lumpur and providing them with accommodation, medical care, and counselling.[131] Altogether, 115 family members of the Chinese passengers flew to Kuala Lumpur.[132] Other family members chose to remain in China, fearing they would feel too isolated in Malaysia.[133] The airline offered an ex gratia condolence payment of US$5,000 to the family of each passenger,[134] but relatives considered the conditions unacceptable and asked the airline to review them.[135]
Investigation
On 8 March Boeing announced that it was assembling a team of experts to provide technical assistance to investigators,[136] in accordance with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) protocols. In addition, the United States National Transportation Safety Board announced in a press release on the same day that a team of investigators had been sent along with technical advisers from the Federal Aviation Administration to offer assistance in the investigation.[104] The country that will lead the investigation will not be determined until the missing aircraft is found.[137] Because a formal (ICAO-sanctioned) investigation has not yet started, co-operation and co-ordination between involved parties could suffer, there being "a risk that crucial early detective work could be hampered, and potential clues and records lost", according to experts.[138]
The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation has deployed technical experts and agents to investigate the disappearance.[139] A senior US law enforcement official clarified that FBI agents were not sent to Malaysia.[140] United States and Malaysian officials are reviewing the entire passenger manifest in addition to the two passengers who were confirmed as possessing stolen passports.[141]
Stolen passports
Two of the passengers were travelling with passports stolen from citizens of European countries. Two men identified on the manifest, a 61-year-old Austrian and a 37-year-old Italian, had reported their passports stolen in 2012 and 2013, respectively.[21][142] Interpol stated that both passports were listed on its database of lost and stolen passports, but that no check had been made against its database, noting that very few countries consistently use the database.[143][144] Malaysia's Home Minister, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, criticised his country's immigration officials for failing to stop the passengers travelling on the stolen European passports.[144]
The two one-way tickets purchased for the holders of the stolen passports were booked through China Southern Airlines.[145] It was reported that an Iranian had ordered the cheapest tickets to Europe via telephone in Bangkok, Thailand. The tickets were paid for in cash.[146][147][148] A Thai police chief suggested that the tickets were bought for illegal Iranian migrants.[149] The two passengers were later identified as Iranian men, one aged 19 and the other 29, who both entered Malaysia on 28 February using valid Iranian passports. The head of Interpol said they were "inclined to conclude that it was not a terrorist incident".[12][122][150][151] The two men were believed to be illegal migrants or asylum seekers.[152][153]
Responses
Criticism of official communication
Public communication from official representatives of many organisations regarding the loss of the flight has been beset with confusion. The New York Times noted that the Malaysian government and the airline released imprecise, incomplete, and sometimes inaccurate information, with civilian officials sometimes contradicting military leaders.[154] The Daily Beast suggested that nobody was co-ordinating information.[155] David Learmount, operations and safety editor at Flightglobal, a news and data service for the aviation sector, said the Malaysian government seemed evasive and confused.[154] There are doubts concerning the aircraft's possible location and trajectory.[156][157][158] Australian crisis management expert Mike Smith believes that although the initial stages had been well-managed by Malaysia Airlines, the increasing numbers of government officials commenting publicly created confusion. Smith suggested that, as the disappearance became of international concern, the Malaysian government failed to take control and to establish an emergency crisis control point where the information could be disseminated in a responsible and truthful manner. Smith pointed to contradictions, apparent "finger-pointing, rumours and innuendo ... from Malaysian officials, whose motives we can only speculate about".[159] Malaysian officials have also been criticised after the persistent release of contradictory information, most notably regarding the last point and time of contact with the aircraft, amongst other issues.[160]
Vietnam temporarily scaled back its search operations after the country's Deputy Transport Minister cited a lack of communication from Malaysian officials despite requests for more information.[161] China, through the official Xinhua News Agency, said that the Malaysian government ought to take charge and conduct the operation with greater transparency,[107] a point echoed by the Chinese Foreign Ministry days later: "help all sides in the search to make their search more effective and accurately targeted".[162]
The Daily Beast observed that the confusion was related to the strength of the military over civilian authority in Malaysia. It argued that, where the military either controls or has strong influence over radar coverage and air traffic control, "there is no coherent system that swings into action in a disaster, no playbook to operate by and no experience of dealing with the public consequences."[155]
Airline
Malaysia Airlines stated it would replace the flight numbers MH370 and MH371 with MH318 and MH319 respectively, as of 14 March 2014, out of respect for the passengers and crew.[163]
Notes
- ^ The aircraft was a Boeing 777-200ER (for Extended Range) model; Boeing assigns a unique customer code for each company that buys one of its aircraft, which is applied as a suffix to the model number at the time the aircraft is built. The code for Malaysia Airlines is "H6", hence "777-2H6ER".[108]
- ^ The manifest released by Malaysia Airlines lists an Austrian and an Italian. These have since been identified as two Iranian nationals who boarded Flight 370 using stolen passports.[122]
References
- ^ "BBC News - Malaysia Airlines MH370: Last communication revealed". Bbc.com. 1 January 1970. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ a b c Hildebrandt, Amber (10 March 2014). Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: 'Mystery compounded by mystery'. CBC News.
- ^ a b Buncombe, Andrew; Withnall, Adam (10 March 2014). "Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Oil slicks in South China Sea ‘not from missing jet’, officials say". The Independent.
- ^ Grudgings, Stuart. "Malaysia Airlines plane crashes in South China Sea with 239 people aboard: report". Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ Tasnim Lokman (9 March 2014). "MISSING MH370: Indonesia helps in search for airliner". New Straits Times. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ Grudgings, Stewart. "Confusion as search for Malaysian jet spreads across SE Asia". Reuters. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia News | AsiaOne". News.asiaone.com. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ White House: Hunt for missing airliner may extend to Indian Ocean The Washington Post 13 March 2014
- ^ a b Martha Raddatz (13 March 2014), US Officials Have 'Indication' Malaysia Airline Crashed into Indian Ocean ABC News
- ^ a b Andy Pasztor (12 March 2014), Missing Airplane Flew On for Hours The Wall Street Journal
- ^ a b Bob Orr (13 March 2014), Did Malaysian plane fly toward Indian Ocean after last contact? CBS News
- ^ a b Tania Branigan; Kate Hodal (10 March 2014). "Flight MH370: officials 'puzzled' by Malaysia mystery as search widens". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines MH370: Stolen passport 'no terror link'". BBC News. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ a b "CNN, Search for missing Malaysia Airlines plane expands to Indian Ocean". Edition.cnn.com. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ Malaysiakini – Tue, Mar 11, 2014 (20 April 2011). "Yahoo news, MH370 detected above Malacca Straits at 2.40am". My.news.yahoo.com. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "CNN, Missing Malaysian plane: Could it have landed?". Edition.cnn.com. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ "FlightRadar24.com MH370 7 March 2014".
- ^ "Malaysian Airlines System (MH) No. 370 ✈ 08-Mar-2014 ✈ WMKK / KUL – ZBAA / PEK ✈". flightaware. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ Pilot: I established contact with plane New Straits Times 9 March 2014.
- ^ Malaysia Airlines. "04:20 PM MYT +0800 Malaysia Airlines MH370 Flight Incident – 4th Media Statement". Malaysia Airlines. Archived from the original on 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c "Crash: Malaysia B772 over Gulf of Thailand on Mar 8th 2014, aircraft missing". The Aviation Herald. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing MAS flight: Last point of contact was east of Kota Baru". The Star. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ "No MH370 Distress Call, Search Area Widened". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 12 March 2014.
- ^ Greg Waldron (11 March 2014), Malaysian officials non-committal on MH370 ACARS transmissions Flightglobal.
- ^ Paul Marks (11 March 2014), Malaysian plane sent out engine data before vanishing New Scientist
- ^ a b "Malaysia says no evidence missing plane flew hours after losing contact". Reuters. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ "Satellites picked up pings from Malaysia jet, source says". Reuters. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ New MH370 search area may be opened in Indian Ocean - White House The Daily Telegraph 13 March 2014
- ^ Inmarsat statement on Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 Immarsat 14 March 2014
- ^ Chris Buckley and Nicola Clark (14 March 2014), Satellite Firm Says Its Data From Jet Could Offer Location The New York Times
- ^ "Vietnam detects signals from missing plane". San Francisco Chronicle. 7 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing Malaysia Airlines Plane Remains Mystery". Sky News. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Oil slick spotted by rescuers 'not from missing Malaysia Airlines flight', tests reveal". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Accident description". Aviation Safety Network. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ Jim Clancy and Mark Morgenstein (9 March 2014). "New leads explored in hunt for missing Malaysia Airlines flight". CNN News. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ Pete Williams, Robert Windrem and Richard Esposito (9 March 2014). "Missing Malaysia Airlines Jet May Have Turned Back: Officials". NBC News. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Reports: Missing Malaysia Airlines plane 'may have turned back'". BBC News. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "DCA: Search for MH370 intensifies with 74 vessels, 50 nautical miles near last-known site" The Malay Mail, 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines: What we know about flight MH370". BBC. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ a b "Missing Malaysia plane: Search area widened". BBC News. 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines MH370: Plane 'changed course'". BBC. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines live: military denies report they tracked plane hundreds of miles off course". The Telegraph. 11 March 2014.
- ^ Danubrata, Eveline; Koswanage, Niluksi (11 March 2014). "Malaysia military tracked missing plane to west coast: source". Reuters. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ "MISSING MH370: RMAF chief denies military radar report". New Straits Times. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing Malaysia Airlines plane: Air force chief denies tracking jet to Strait of Malacca". The Straits Times. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing Malaysia Airlines plane: Vietnam suspends air search for MH370". The Straits Times. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Matthew Wald (13 March 2014), U.S. Takes Back Seat in Malaysian Jet Inquiry The New York Times
- ^ Michael Forsythe and Michael S. Schmidt (14 March 2014), Sharp Changes in Altitude and Course After Jet Lost Contact The New York Times
- ^ Niluksi Koswanage (14 March 2014), Radar data suggests missing Malaysia plane deliberately flown way off course - sources Reuters
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines MH370: Confusion over plane last location". BBC News. 12 March 2014.
- ^ "Satellite looking into missing Malaysia flight detects 'suspected crash area'". CNN News. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ "China Releases Images of What Could be Parts of Missing Plane". Malaysia Sun. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Vietnam sees no debris in area flagged by Chinese". CNN News. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines MH370: China 'will not give up' on plane". BBC News. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ Brummitt, Chris. "Malaysia: No debris at spot shown on China images". Associated Press.
- ^ "U.S. suspects missing flight flew for hours after last confirmed location, report says". The Washington Post. 28 February 2011.
- ^ Abby Ohlheiser. "Oil Rig Worker Thinks He Saw Malaysia Air Flight 370 Go Down in Flames". Business Insider. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Martinez and Newsome. "Crowdsourcing volunteers comb satellite photos for Malaysia Airlines jet". CNN. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Sandell, Clayton. "Crowdsourcing the Search for Malaysia Flight 370". ABC News. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Karl Malakunas (13 March 2014),Distrust adding to Malaysian jet confusion: analysts, AFP
- ^ "MISSING MH370: Malaysia welcomes SAR assistance from other countries". New Straits Times. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ Wong, Chun-Han; Vu, Trong Khanh; Raghuvanshi, Gaurav (9 March 2014). "Countries Put Disputes Aside for Airliner Search". The Wall Street Journal.
- ^ "French accident board offers help recovering missing flight MH370". The Malaysian Insider. Yahoo! News. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing MH370: Qatar ready to help in SAR efforts". The Sun. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ "IDC infrasound search for missing flight Malaysian Airlines MH370" (PDF). CTBTO Prep Com. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ a b "Too early to come to any conclusion, says Najib". Daily Express. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Vietnam, Malaysia mount search for plane". Sky News Australia. 8 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia widens area of search for missing MAS aircraft". Borneo Post. Bernama. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing MAS flight: Malaysia grateful for assistance in search and rescue operations, says Anifah". The Star. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Australia sending two P3C Orions from Darwin to Malaysia to aid with the search for missing Malaysian flight MH370". News Corp Australia. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Bangladesh to Help Search Missing Plane". The Financial Express. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ Zhu Ningzhu (10 March 2014). "Brunei's Suldan [sic] sends message of sympathy to Chinese president over loss of flight MH370". Xinhua News Agency. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ "China dispatches more vessels for plane search". Xinhua News Agency. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Chinese warships on way to rescue mission". Xinhua News Agency. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "China deploys satellites for missing plane search". Xinhua News Agency. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines MH370: India deploys 4 warships in search ops". Livemint. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ "India to deploy helicopters, ships in Malaysian jet search". Reuters. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ "India joins global search to locate missing Malaysia Airlines plane". The Indian Express. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ a b c Gupta, Jayanta. "Indian Navy joins search". The Times of India. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ Indian Navy joins the search for missing Malaysian plane IBN Live 13 March 2014
- ^ Bagus BT Saragih (9 March 2014). "RI deploy warships as search expands to Malacca Strait". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ Fadli (9 March 2014). "RI deploys warships, aircraft to SCS to search for missing aircraft". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "MH370 SAR ops: Tokyo dispatches Japan Disaster Relief team". The Malay Mail. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Michael Field (11 March 2014). "NZ air force joins search for missing jet". stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysian plane crashed off Vietnam coast: state media". Yahoo News. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ "PH joins SE Asia search for Malaysian plane". Rappler. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines: How is the search being carried out". BBC News. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ "PH planes ships still have no sighting of missing malaysian jet". Philippine Daily Inquirer. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Phl Navy's helicopter joins search for missing Malaysian Airlines plane". The Philippine Star. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines missing flight: Live Report". Yahoo! News Malaysia. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysian Airlines missing flight MH370: Live Report". Digital Journal. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ "Additional SAF assets deployed in response to missing Malaysia Airlines Plane (09 Mar 14)". Ministry of Defence of Singapore. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/s-pore-deploys-another/1035510.html
- ^ "MISSING MH370: South Korea sends two aircraft to help with SAR". New Straits Times. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ "Taiwan joins search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370". Taiwan Today. 11 March 2014. Archived from the original on 12 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ "Search for missing Malaysian jet involves 8 countries". The Nation. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Thai navy ready to deploy rescue vessels, aircraft for missing Malaysian plane: spokesman". CCTV News. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "MISSING MH370: Rescue efforts under way". New Straits Times. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "U.S. Sends Destroyer to Aid Search for Malaysia Airlines Jet". NBC News. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
- ^ "US Navy sending P-8A Poseidon to assist in search for missing flight MH370". The Malaysian Insider. 13 March 2014.
- ^ "Oil Slick Not From Missing Malaysian Jet, Investigators Say". NBC News. 22 November 2013. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "US bolsters support for search of lost plane". Malaysia Sun. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ a b "Press Release March 8, 2014: NTSB positioning team to offer assistance in investigation of Malaysia Airlines 777 event". Ntsb.gov. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "RSAF sends plane to search for missing Malaysia Airlines aircraft". Channel NewsAsia. 8 March 2014.
- ^ "No piece of metal found 60km from Vung Tau". Bubblews.
- ^ a b c d Malakunas, Karl (AFP) "Distrust adding to Malaysian jet confusion: analysts". Google News. 14 March 2014.
- ^ Pither, Tony (1998). The Boeing 707 720 and C-135. England: Air-Britain (Historians) Ltd. ISBN 0-85130-236-X.
- ^ a b "Malaysia Airlines 9M-MRO (Boeing 777 – MSN 28420)". Airfleets. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
- ^ "Boeing 777-200 – Fleet". Malaysia Airlines. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ a b Toh, Mavis. "MAS 777 underwent maintenance in Feb". Flightglobal. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing MAS 777-200 had no major prior incidents – 3/8/2014". Flightglobal. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "浦东机场滑行跑道内东航马航两飞机剐蹭 ["Two planes from China Eastern Airlines and Malaysian Airlines snag each other on the runway of Shanghai Pudong Airport"]– 新华财经 – 新华网". Xinhua News Agency. 26 June 2012. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines: experts surprised at disappearance of 'very safe' Boeing 777". The Guardian. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines has one of Asia's best safety records". Reuters. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ 06.31 GMT. "Malaysia Airlines: experts surprised at disappearance of 'very safe' Boeing 777". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "NTSB Investigates Asiana 777 Accident in San Francisco". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 6 July 2013. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ Accident description for Malaysia Airlines Flight 124 at the Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved on 15 October 2008.
- ^ "In-flight upset event, 240 km north-west of Perth, WA, Boeing Company 777-200, 9M-MRG, 1 August 2005" (PDF). Australian Transport Safety Bureau. 13 March 2007. Retrieved 15 October 2008.
- ^ "Emergency Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005-18-51". Federal Aviation Administration. 29 August 2005. Retrieved 15 October 2008.
- ^ Kao, Ernest (9 March 2014). "Hong Kong woman named as passenger on board missing Malaysia Airlines flight". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ a b "Stolen jet passport 'no terror link'". BBC News. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ "MH370 Passenger Manifest" (Press release). Malaysia Airlines. 8 March 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing MAS flight: Captain piloting MH370 a Penang boy". The Straits Times. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ Koswanage, Niluksi (9 March 2014). "Pilot of missing Malaysian flight an aviation tech geek". Reuters. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "MISSING MH370: Co-pilot family awaits for latest updates – Latest". New Straits Times. 8 March 2014.
- ^ a b Watkins, Tom (10 March 2014). "First officer on missing jet was transitioning to 777-200s". CNN. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Behind jet's passenger list is rich human tapestry". The Washington Post. Associated Press. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "No sign of Malaysia Airline wreckage; questions over stolen passports". CNN. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing MAS flight: MAS team arrives in Beijing". The Star. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Caregivers from Malaysia, Australia assigned to families of passengers onboard MH370". The Malay Mail.
- ^ "Missing Malaysia jet may have veered off course". CNBC. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ "MISSING MH370: Families cling to faint hopes: psychologist". New Straits Times. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Rose, Adam (12 March 2014). "Malaysia Airlines says no reason to think crew caused jet's disappearance". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ "MAS cash aid snubbed by kin of Chinese aboard MH370". The Malay Mail. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ "Boeing team to offer technical help to investigators". Deccan Chronicle.
- ^ Toh, Mavis. "NTSB sends team to assist in MH370 case". Flightglobal. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Missing Malaysia Airlines plane's legal limbo hampers probe". The Sydney Morning Herald. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|authors=
ignored (help) - ^ Serrano, Richard A. "FBI to investigate disappearance of a Malaysian Airlines jet." Los Angeles Times. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "FBI not in on Malaysia crash probe; other U.S. agencies to arrive Monday". Reuters. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ Simon Denyer, Robert Barnes and Chico Harlan (9 March 2014). "Four flew with false ID aboard Malaysia Airlines plane that vanished over South China Sea". The Washington Post. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ Catherine E. Shoichet and Ray Sanchez (9 March 2014 – Updated 1337 GMT (2137 HKT)). "Plane bore painters, pilgrims, others from around the world". CNN. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "INTERPOL confirms at least two stolen passports used by passengers on missing Malaysian Airlines flight 370 were registered in its databases". Interpol. Retrieved 9 March 2010.
- ^ a b Murdoch, Lindsay (10 March 2014). "Fake passports on Malaysia Airlines flight reveal flaw in airline safety". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ Keith Bradsher; Eric Schmitt (9 March 2014). "Passport Theft Adds to Mystery of Missing Malaysia Airlines Jet". The New York Times.
- ^ Mezzofiore, Gianluca (10 March 2014). "Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Iranian Middleman Asked Thai Agent to Book Tickets on Stolen Passports". International Business Times. UK. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ "Days later, no sign of missing Malaysia Airlines plane". CNN. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "Iranian man bought tickets for Malaysia Air passengers using stolen passports". Haaretz. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ Mark Hosenball (11 March 2014), Search widened as Malaysia air probe finds scant evidence of attack Reuters
- ^ Mullen, Jethro (11 March 2014). "Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: What we know and don't know". CNN. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ Mullen, Jethro (11 March 2014). "Interpol 'inclined to conclude' Malaysia Airlines disappearance not terror". CNN. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- ^ "MISSING MH370: Man with stolen passport on jet is asylum seeker – Latest". New Straits Times.
- ^ Saeed Kamali Dehghan. "Iranians travelling on flight MH370 on forged passports 'not linked to terror' | World". The Guardian.
- ^ a b Fuller, Thomas (11 March 2014). "Confusion Over Plane's Route Frustrates Families and Search". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ a b Irving, Clive (11 March 2014). "The Botched Hunt for Malaysian Airlines Flight 370". The Daily Beast.
- ^ "Malaysia Airlines live: Chinese authorities publish images of possible wreckage". The Daily Telegraph. 15 October 2013.
- ^ Koswanage, Niluksi. "UPDATE 1-Missing Malaysian plane last seen at Strait of Malacca-source". Reuters. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Ng, Eileen. "Malaysia says not sure which way jet was headed". San Francisco Chronicle. Associated Press. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Levy, Megan (12 March 2014). "Missing Malaysia Airlines plane probe marked by confusion, misinformation". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- ^ Denyer, Simon (12 March 2014). "Contradictory statements from Malaysia over missing airliner perplex, infuriate". Washington Post. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ Harlan, Chico (11 March 2014). "Malaysia Airlines plane may have veered wildly off course during flight, military says". Washington Post. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ "China appeals to Malaysia for search information". Associated Press. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ Anwar, Zafira; Nambiar, Predeep "MISSING MH370: MAS changes flight number for KL-Beijing-KL flights". New Straits Times.