John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
| John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued November 6, 2007 Decided January 8, 2008 | |
| Full case name | John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States |
| Citations | 552 U.S. 130 (more) |
| Holding | |
| An action in the Court of Claims must always be timely, even if the government has waived timeliness. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Alito |
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Ginsburg |
| Dissent | Ginsburg |
John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, 552 U.S. 130 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an action in the United States Court of Claims must always be timely, even if the government has waived timeliness.[1][2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, 552 U.S. 130 (2008) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |