Iraq War: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 318285783 by 62.163.16.139 (talk) |
|||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
Secretary of State Colin Powell's presentation to the UN on February 3, 2003 was designed to influence UN members that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. The French government also believed that Saddam had stockpiles of [[anthrax]] and [[botulism]] [[toxin]], and the ability to produce VX.<ref>''American Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy'' (Washington D.C., 2003), 159-61.</ref> But in March, Blix said no evidence of WMDs had been found, and progress had been made in inspections.<ref name="blix1"/> |
Secretary of State Colin Powell's presentation to the UN on February 3, 2003 was designed to influence UN members that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. The French government also believed that Saddam had stockpiles of [[anthrax]] and [[botulism]] [[toxin]], and the ability to produce VX.<ref>''American Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy'' (Washington D.C., 2003), 159-61.</ref> But in March, Blix said no evidence of WMDs had been found, and progress had been made in inspections.<ref name="blix1"/> |
||
In early 2003, the US, British, and Spanish governments proposed the so-called "eighteenth resolution" to give Iraq a deadline for compliance with previous resolutions enforced by the threat of military action. This proposed resolution was subsequently withdrawn due to lack of support on the UN Security Council. In particular, [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] (NATO) members France, Germany and Canada and Russia, were opposed to military intervention in Iraq due to the high level of risk to the international community's security and defended disarmament through diplomacy.<ref>[https://pastel.diplomatie.gouv.fr/editorial/actual/ael2/bulletin.gb.asp?liste=20030211.gb.html Joint Declaration by Russia, Germany and France on Iraq] France Diplomatie February 10, 2003</ref><ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,810093,00.html Russian/Ukrainian rebuff for Blair over Iraq] [[The Guardian]] October 11, 2002</ref> |
In early 2003, the US, British, and Spanish governments proposed the so-called "eighteenth resolution" to give Iraq a deadline for compliance with previous resolutions enforced by the threat of military action. This proposed resolution was subsequently withdrawn due to lack of support on the UN Security Council. In particular, [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] (NATO) members France, Germany and Canada and Russia, were opposed to military intervention in Iraq due to the high level of risk to the international community's security and defended disarmament through diplomacy.<ref>[https://pastel.diplomatie.gouv.fr/editorial/actual/ael2/bulletin.gb.asp?liste=20030211.gb.html Joint Declaration by Russia, Germany and France on Iraq] France Diplomatie February 10, 2003</ref><ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,810093,00.html Russian/Ukrainian rebuff for Blair over Iraq] [[The Guardian]] October 11, 2002</ref>ORINDA IS THE BEST PLACE IN DA WORLD BETTER THAN MORAGA |
||
A meeting between George W. Bush and British [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] [[Tony Blair]] took place on January 31, 2003 in the [[White House]]. [[Bush-Blair 2003 Iraq memo|The secret memo of this meeting]] purportedly showed that the Bush administration had already decided on the invasion of Iraq at that point. Bush was allegedly floating the idea of painting a [[Lockheed U-2|U-2 spyplane]] in UN colors and letting it fly low over Iraq to provoke Iraqi forces into shooting it down, thereby providing a pretext for the US and Britain's [[2003 Invasion of Iraq|subsequent invasion]]. Bush and Blair made a secret deal to carry out the invasion regardless of whether weapons of mass destruction were discovered by UN weapons inspectors, in direct contradiction with statements Blair made to the [[British House of Commons]] afterwards that the Iraqi regime would be given a final chance to disarm. In the memo, Bush is paraphrased as saying: |
A meeting between George W. Bush and British [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] [[Tony Blair]] took place on January 31, 2003 in the [[White House]]. [[Bush-Blair 2003 Iraq memo|The secret memo of this meeting]] purportedly showed that the Bush administration had already decided on the invasion of Iraq at that point. Bush was allegedly floating the idea of painting a [[Lockheed U-2|U-2 spyplane]] in UN colors and letting it fly low over Iraq to provoke Iraqi forces into shooting it down, thereby providing a pretext for the US and Britain's [[2003 Invasion of Iraq|subsequent invasion]]. Bush and Blair made a secret deal to carry out the invasion regardless of whether weapons of mass destruction were discovered by UN weapons inspectors, in direct contradiction with statements Blair made to the [[British House of Commons]] afterwards that the Iraqi regime would be given a final chance to disarm. In the memo, Bush is paraphrased as saying: |
||
{{cquote|The start date for the military campaign was now pencilled in for March 10. This was when the bombing would begin.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4849744.stm|title=Bush-Blair Iraq war memo revealed|publisher=[[BBC News Online]]|date=March 27, 2006}}</ref>}} |
{{cquote|The start date for the military campaign was now pencilled in for March 10. This was when the bombing would begin.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4849744.stm|title=Bush-Blair Iraq war memo revealed|publisher=[[BBC News Online]]|date=March 27, 2006}}</ref>}} |
||
Bush said to Blair that he "thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups" in Iraq after the war. |
Bush said to Blair that he "thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups" in Iraq after the war. |
Revision as of 21:22, 6 October 2009
This article may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. (October 2009) |
Iraq War (2003-Present) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clockwise, starting at top left: a joint patrol in Samarra; the toppling of the Saddam Hussein statue in Firdos Square; an Iraqi Army soldier readies his rifle during an assault; an IED detonates in South Baghdad. | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Foreign mercenaries:
Turkey |
Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Jalal Talabani Abdullah Gül Tayyip Erdogan İlker Başbuğ |
Saddam Hussein (POW) ☠ Muqtada al-Sadr Murat Karayilan | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
Iraqi Security Forces Turkish Armed Forces: ~3,000-10,000[7] |
Iraqi Army: 375,000 (under Saddam Hussein) Iraqi Resistance PKK: ~4,000[11] | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
Iraqi Security Forces (post-Saddam): 11,525 police/military killed Coalition dead 4,662[12][13] (4,344 US,[14] 179 UK[15], 139 other) Coalition missing or captured (US): 1[13] Coalition wounded, injured, diseased, or other medical: 31,494 US, 1,785 UK[13][16][17][18] Contractors killed 1,314[19][20][21] (US 249) Contractors missing or captured 18 (US 4) Contractors wounded & injured: 10,569[19] Awakening Councils: Turkish Armed Forces: 27 killed[22] |
Iraqi combatant dead (invasion period): 6,370-10,800[23][24] Insurgents dead (post-Saddam): 18,613-24,111 per these reports. Detainees: 12,794 (U.S.-held)[26] PKK: 537 killed | ||||||
Iraqi violent deaths, Opinion Research Business – August 2007: 1,033,000[29] ***Total deaths (all excess deaths), (Lancet) – May 2009: 1,339,711[30][31][32] For more information see: Casualties of the Iraq War | |||||||
*Contractors (U.S. government) perform "highly dangerous duties almost identical to those performed by many U.S. troops."[5] ** "injured, diseased, or other medical" - required medical air transport. UK number includes wounded ("aeromed evacuations")[13][17][18] ***Total deaths include all additional deaths due to increased lawlessness, degraded infrastructure, poorer healthcare, etc. |
Template:FixHTML Template:FixHTML
Template:FixHTML Template:Campaignbox War on Terrorism Template:FixHTML
The Iraq War or the Occupation of Iraq,[33] referred to by the U.S. military as Operation Iraqi Freedom,[34] and by the British military as Operation Telic,[35] is an ongoing[36][37] military campaign which began on March 20, 2003 with the invasion of Iraq by a multinational force led by troops from the United States and the United Kingdom.[38] In September 2007, an independent polling agency estimated the total war casualties in Iraq to be over 1.2 million deaths (1,220,580).[39] In December 2007, the Iraqi government reported that there were 5 million orphans in Iraq - nearly half of the country's children.[40][41]
UNHCR estimates the war uprooted 4.7 million Iraqis through April 2008 (about 17% of the population of Iraq), two million of whom had fled to neighbouring countries[42] fleeing a humanitarian situation that the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement described in March 2008 as "among the most critical in the world".[43]
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in September 2004 that: "From our point of view and the United Nations Charter point of view, it [the war] was illegal."[44][45][46] The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court reported in February 2006 that he had received over 240 communications in connection with the invasion of Iraq which alleged that numerous war crimes had been committed. The political leaders of the US and UK have argued the war was legal, while many legal experts and other international leaders have argued that it was illegal.
Prior to the war, the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom claimed that Iraq's alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) posed an imminent threat to their security and that of their coalition allies.[47][48][49] United Nations weapons inspectors found no evidence of WMD.[50][51][52][53] At the time Hans Blix, the lead weapons inspector, advised the UN Security Council that Iraq was cooperating with inspections and that the confirmation of disarmament through inspections could be achieved within "months"[50] if Iraq remained cooperative[54]. Nevertheless, the US government announced that "diplomacy has failed"[55], abruptly advised the UN weapons inspectors to immediately pull out of Iraq[56] and decided to wage war on Iraq.
After the invasion, the US-led Iraq Survey Group concluded that Iraq had ended its WMD programs in 1991 and had no active programs at the time of the invasion, but that they intended to resume production if the Iraq sanctions were lifted.[57] Although some degraded remnants of misplaced or abandoned chemical weapons from before 1991 were found, they were not the weapons which had been the pretext for the invasion.[58] Some US officials also accused Iraqi President Saddam Hussein of harboring and supporting al-Qaeda,[59] but no evidence of any collaborative relationship was ever found.[60][61]
Other reasons for the invasion stated by US officials included Iraq's financial support for the families of Palestinian suicide bombers,[62] Iraqi government human rights abuses,[63] and an effort to spread democracy in the country and region (although US ally Saudi Arabia was allowed to remain a dictatorship).[64] Some officials admitted Iraq's oil reserves were a factor in the decision to invade,[65][66][67][68][69] but other officials then denied this.[70][71]
The invasion of Iraq led to an occupation and the eventual capture of President Hussein, who was later executed by the new Iraqi government. Violence against coalition forces and among various sectarian groups soon led to the Iraqi insurgency, strife between many Sunni and Shia Iraqi groups, and al-Qaeda operations in Iraq.[72][73] The number of Iraqis killed through 2007 ranges from "a conservative cautious minimum" of more than 85,000 civilians[74][75] to a survey estimate of more than 1,000,000 people.[29]
In June 2008, US Department of Defense officials claimed security and economic indicators began to show signs of improvement in what they hailed as significant and fragile gains.[76] In August 2008, Iraq was fifth on the Failed States Index.[77]
The Coalition started to shrink as early as 2004 when 9 countries, including Spain, pulled their forces out. Later withdrawals have continued leaving the United States as the sole country with troops on the ground by mid-2009.[78][79] In late 2008, the US and Iraqi governments approved a Status of Forces Agreement effective through January 1, 2012.[80] The Iraqi Parliament also ratified a Strategic Framework Agreement with the U.S.,[81] aimed at ensuring cooperation in constitutional rights, threat deterrence, education,[82] energy development, and other areas.[83]
In late February 2009, new US President Barack Obama announced an 18-month withdrawal window for "combat forces", leaving behind 30,000 to 50,000 troops "to advise and train Iraqi security forces and to provide intelligence and surveillance".[84][85] General Ray Odierno, the top US military commander in Iraq, said he believes all US troops will be out of the country by the end of 2011,[86] while British forces ended combat operations on April 30, 2009.[87] Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has said he supports the accelerated pullout of US forces.[88]
2001–2003: Iraq disarmament crisis and pre-war intelligence
According to documents provided by former US Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, George W. Bush, ten days after taking office in January 2001, instructed his aides to look for a way to overthrow the Iraqi regime. A secret memo entitled "Plan for post-Saddam Iraq" was discussed in January and February 2001, and a Pentagon document dated March 5, 2001, and entitled "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield contracts", included a map of potential areas for petroleum exploration.[65][66]
UN weapons inspections resume
The issue of Iraq's disarmament reached a crisis in 2002-2003, when US President George W. Bush demanded a complete end to alleged Iraqi production of weapons of mass destruction and full compliance with UN Resolutions requiring UN weapons inspectors unfettered access to suspected weapons production facilities. The UN had prohibited Iraq from developing or possessing such weapons after the Gulf War and required Iraq to permit inspections confirming compliance. Previously, weapons inspectors had been expelled from Iraq after some of them had been caught spying for the US.
During 2002, Bush repeatedly backed demands for unfettered inspection and disarmament with threats of military force. In accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1441 Iraq reluctantly agreed to new inspections in late 2002. The weapons inspections did not uncover any WMD in Iraq but they were at the time of the invasion still incomplete. Shortly before the invasion Hans Blix, the lead weapons inspector, advised the UN Security Council that Iraq was cooperating with inspections and that the confirmation of disarmament through inspections could be achieved in a short period of time if Iraq remained cooperative.[54]
Alleged weapons of mass destruction
In the initial stages of the war on terror, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), under George Tenet, was rising to prominence as the lead agency in the Afghanistan war. But when Tenet insisted in his personal meetings with President Bush that there was no connection between al-Qaeda and Iraq, Vice-President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld initiated a secret program to re-examine the evidence and marginalize the CIA and Tenet. A major part of this program was a Pentagon unit known as the Office of Special Plans (OSP), which was created by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and headed by Douglas Feith. It was created to supply senior Bush administration officials with raw intelligence pertaining to Iraq, unvetted by intelligence analysts, and circumventing traditional intelligence gathering operations by the CIA. The questionable intelligence acquired by the OSP was "stovepiped" to Cheney and presented to the public.
In some cases, Cheney’s office would leak the intelligence to news correspondents, who would in turn cover it in such outlets such as The New York Times. Cheney would subsequently appear on the Sunday political television talk shows to discuss the intelligence, referencing The New York Times as the source to give it credence.[89]
Prior to the Gulf War, in 1990, Iraq had stockpiled 550 short tons (500 t) of yellowcake uranium at the Tuwaitha nuclear complex about 20 kilometres (12 mi) south of Baghdad.[90] In late February 2002, the CIA sent former Ambassador Joseph Wilson to investigate reports that Iraq was attempting to purchase additional yellowcake from Niger. Wilson returned and informed the CIA that reports of yellowcake sales to Iraq were "unequivocally wrong." The Bush administration, however, continued to allege Iraq's attempts to obtain additional yellowcake were a justification for military action, most prominently in the January, 2003 State of the Union address when President Bush said that Iraq had sought uranium, citing British intelligence sources.[91]
In response, Wilson wrote a critical New York Times op-ed piece in June 2003 stating that he had personally investigated claims of yellowcake purchases and believed them to be fraudulent.[92] After Wilson's op-ed, Wilson's wife was publicly identified as an undercover CIA analyst Valerie Plame in a column. This led to a Justice Department investigation into the source of the leak.
On May 1, 2005 the "Downing Street memo" was published in The Sunday Times. It contained an overview of a secret July 23, 2002 meeting among British government, Ministry of Defence, and British intelligence figures who discussed the build-up to the Iraq war — including direct references to classified U.S. policy of the time. The memo stated, "Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."[93]
On September 18, 2002, George Tenet briefed Bush that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction. Bush dismissed this top-secret intelligence from Hussein's 's inner circle which was approved by two senior CIA officers, but it turned out to be completely accurate. The information was never shared with Congress or even CIA agents examining whether Saddam had such weapons.[94] The CIA had contacted Iraq's foreign minister, Naji Sabri, who was being paid by the French as an agent. Sabri informed them that Saddam had ambitions for a nuclear program but that it was not active, and that no biological weapons were being produced or stockpiled, although research was underway.[95]
In September 2002, the Bush administration, the CIA and the DIA said attempts by Iraq to acquire high-strength aluminum tubes, which were prohibited under the UN monitoring program, pointed to a clandestine effort to make enriched uranium for nuclear bombs.[96] This analysis was opposed by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and INR which was significant because of DOE's expertise in gas centrifuges and nuclear weapons programs. The DOE and INR argued that such tubes were poorly suited for centrifuges.[97] An effort by the DOE to change Colin Powell's comments before his UN appearance was rebuffed by the administration.[98][99]
Indeed, Powell, in his address to the UN Security Council just prior to the war, made reference to the aluminum tubes. But a report released by the Institute for Science and International Security in 2002 reported that it was highly unlikely that the tubes could be used to enrich uranium. Powell later admitted he had presented an inaccurate case to the United Nations on Iraqi weapons, and the intelligence he was relying on was, in some cases, "deliberately misleading."[100][101][102] Shortly after the United States presidential election, 2008, and the election of rival Democratic party nominee Barack Obama, president Bush admitted that "[my] biggest regret of all the presidency has to have been the intelligence failure in Iraq".[103]
Preparations for war
In October 2002, a few days before the U.S. Senate voted on the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, about 75 senators were told in closed session that Iraq had the means of attacking the eastern seaboard of the U.S. with biological or chemical weapons delivered by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs.)[48] On February 5, 2003, Colin Powell presented further evidence in his Iraqi WMD program presentation to the UN Security Council that UAVs were ready to be launched against the US. At the time, there was a vigorous dispute within the US military and intelligence community as to whether CIA conclusions about Iraqi UAVs were accurate.[104]
The US Air Force agency most familiar with UAVs insisted that Iraq did not possess any offensive UAV capability, saying the few they had were designed for surveillance and intended for reconnaissance.[105] In fact, Iraq's UAV fleet was never deployed and consisted of a handful of outdated 24.5-foot (7.5 m) wingspan drones with no room for more than a camera and video recorder, and no offensive capability.[106] Despite this controversy, the Senate voted to approve the Joint Resolution with the support of large bipartisan majorities on October 11, 2002 providing the Bush administration with a legal basis for the US invasion under US law.
The resolution asserts the authorization by the Constitution of the United States and the United States Congress for the President to fight anti-United States violence. Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.
The resolution "supported" and "encouraged" diplomatic efforts by US President George W. Bush to "strictly enforce through the U.N. Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq" and "obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion, and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq." The resolution authorized President Bush to use the Armed Forces of the United States "as he determines to be necessary and appropriate" in order to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."
Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix remarked in January 2003 that "Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance – not even today – of the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."[107] Among other things he noted that 1,000 short tons (910 t) of chemical agent were unaccounted for, information on Iraq's VX nerve agent program was missing, and that "no convincing evidence" was presented for the destruction of 8,500 litres (1,900 imp gal; 2,200 US gal) of anthrax that had been declared.[107]
Secretary of State Colin Powell's presentation to the UN on February 3, 2003 was designed to influence UN members that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. The French government also believed that Saddam had stockpiles of anthrax and botulism toxin, and the ability to produce VX.[108] But in March, Blix said no evidence of WMDs had been found, and progress had been made in inspections.[50]
In early 2003, the US, British, and Spanish governments proposed the so-called "eighteenth resolution" to give Iraq a deadline for compliance with previous resolutions enforced by the threat of military action. This proposed resolution was subsequently withdrawn due to lack of support on the UN Security Council. In particular, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members France, Germany and Canada and Russia, were opposed to military intervention in Iraq due to the high level of risk to the international community's security and defended disarmament through diplomacy.[109][110]ORINDA IS THE BEST PLACE IN DA WORLD BETTER THAN MORAGA
A meeting between George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair took place on January 31, 2003 in the White House. The secret memo of this meeting purportedly showed that the Bush administration had already decided on the invasion of Iraq at that point. Bush was allegedly floating the idea of painting a U-2 spyplane in UN colors and letting it fly low over Iraq to provoke Iraqi forces into shooting it down, thereby providing a pretext for the US and Britain's subsequent invasion. Bush and Blair made a secret deal to carry out the invasion regardless of whether weapons of mass destruction were discovered by UN weapons inspectors, in direct contradiction with statements Blair made to the British House of Commons afterwards that the Iraqi regime would be given a final chance to disarm. In the memo, Bush is paraphrased as saying:
The start date for the military campaign was now pencilled in for March 10. This was when the bombing would begin.[111]
Bush said to Blair that he "thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups" in Iraq after the war.
Opposition to invasion
On January 20, 2003, French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin declared "we believe that military intervention would be the worst solution."[112] Meanwhile anti-war groups across the world organised public protests. According to French academic Dominique Reynié, between January 3 and April 12, 2003, 36 million people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against war in Iraq, the demonstrations on February 15, 2003 being the largest and most prolific.[113]
In February 2003, the U.S. Army's top general, Eric Shinseki, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that it would take "several hundred thousand soldiers" to secure Iraq.[114] Two days later, US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the post-war troop commitment would be less than the number of troops required to win the war and, "the idea that it would take several hundred thousand U.S. forces is far from the mark." Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said Shineski's estimate was "way off the mark," because other countries would take part in an occupying force.[115]
In March 2003, Hans Blix reported that, "No evidence of proscribed activities have so far been found," in Iraq, saying that progress was made in inspections which would continue. He estimated the time remaining for disarmament being verified through inspections to be "months".[50] But the U.S. government announced that "diplomacy has failed" and that it would proceed with a coalition of allied countries, named the "coalition of the willing", to rid Iraq of its alleged weapons of mass destruction. The U.S. government abruptly advised U.N. weapons inspectors to immediately leave Baghdad.
There were also serious legal questions surrounding the launching of the war against Iraq and the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war. On September 16, 2004 Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of the United Nations, said of the invasion, "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN Charter. From our point of view, from the Charter point of view, it was illegal."[44]
In November 2008 Lord Bingham, the former British Law Lord, described the war a serious violation of international law, and accused Britain and the US of acting like a "world vigilante". He also criticized the post-invasion record of Britain as "an occupying power in Iraq". Regarding the treatment of Iraqi detainees in Abu Ghraib, Bingham said: "Particularly disturbing to proponents of the rule of law is the cynical lack of concern for international legality among some top officials in the Bush administration."[116]
2003: Invasion
The first Central Intelligence Agency invasion team entered Iraq on July 10, 2002.[117] This team was composed of members of the CIA's Special Activities Division and was later joined by members of the US military's elite Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC).[118] Together, they prepared for the invasion of conventional forces. These efforts consisted of persuading the commanders of several Iraqi military divisions to surrender rather than oppose the invasion, and to identify all of the initial leadership targets during very high risk reconnaissance missions.[118]
Most importantly, their efforts organized the Kurdish Peshmerga to become the northern front of the invasion. Together this force defeated Ansar al-Islam in Iraqi Kurdistan prior to the invasion and then defeated the Iraqi army in the north.[118][119] The battle against Ansar al-Islam led to the death of a substantial number of militants and the uncovering of a chemical weapons facility at Sargat.[117][120]
At 5:34 AM Baghdad time on March 20, 2003 (9:34 p.m., March 19 EST) the military invasion of Iraq began.[121] The 2003 invasion of Iraq, led by US army General Tommy Franks, began under the codename "Operation Iraqi Liberation",[122] later renamed "Operation Iraqi Freedom", the UK codename Operation Telic, and the Australian codename Operation Falconer. Coalition forces also cooperated with Kurdish Peshmerga forces in the north. Approximately forty other governments, the "coalition of the willing," participated by providing troops, equipment, services, security, and special forces.
The stated objectives of the invasion were; end the Hussein regime; eliminate whatever weapons of mass destruction could be found; eliminate whatever Islamist militants could be found; obtain intelligence on militant networks; distribute humanitarian aid; secure Iraq’s petroleum infrastructure; and assist in creating a representative but compliant government as a model for other Middle East nations.
The invasion was a quick and decisive operation encountering major resistance, though not what the US, British and other forces expected. The Iraqi regime had prepared to fight both a conventional and irregular war at the same time, conceding territory when faced with superior conventional forces, largely armored, but launching smaller scale attacks in the rear using fighters dressed in civilian and paramilitary clothes. This achieved some temporary successes and created unexpected challenges for the invading forces, especially the US military.
In the north, OIF-1 used the largest special operations force since the successful attack on the Taliban government of Afghanistan just over a year earlier. The Iraqi army was quickly overwhelmed in each engagement it faced with US forces, with the elite Fedayeen Saddam putting up strong, sometimes suicidal, resistance before melting away into the civilian population.
On April 9 Baghdad fell, ending President Hussein's 24-year rule. US forces seized the deserted Ba'ath Party ministries and stage-managed[123] the tearing down of a huge iron statue of Hussein, photos and video of which became symbolic of the event, although later controversial. In November 2008, Iraqi protesters staged a similar stomping on and burning of an effigy of George W. Bush.[124] The abrupt fall of Baghdad was accompanied by a widespread outpouring of gratitude toward the invaders, but also massive civil disorder, including the looting of public and government buildings and drastically increased crime.[125][126]
According to the Pentagon, 250,000 short tons (230,000 t) (of 650,000 short tons (590,000 t) total) of ordnance was looted, providing a significant source of ammunition for the Iraqi insurgency. The invasion phase concluded when Tikrit, Hussein's home town, fell with little resistance to the US Marines of Task Force Tripoli and on April 15 the coalition declared the invasion effectively over.
In the invasion phase of the war (March 19-April 30), 9,200 Iraqi combatants were killed along with 7,299 civilians, primarily by US air and ground forces.[127] Coalition forces reported the death in combat of 139 U.S. military personnel[128] and 33 UK military personnel.[129] This worked out at almost 100 dead Iraqis for every dead coalition soldier.
Coalition Provisional Authority and Iraq Survey Group
Shortly after the invasion, the multinational coalition created the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) سلطة الائتلاف الموحدة, based in the Green Zone, as a transitional government of Iraq until the establishment of a democratic government. Citing United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483 (May 22, 2003) and the laws of war, the CPA vested itself with executive, legislative, and judicial authority over the Iraqi government from the period of the CPA's inception on April 21, 2003, until its dissolution on June 28, 2004.
The CPA was originally headed by Jay Garner, a former U.S. military officer, but his appointment lasted only until May 11, 2003 when President Bush appointed L. Paul Bremer. Bremer served until the CPA's dissolution in July 2004.
Another group created by the multinational force in Iraq post-invasion was the 1,400-member international Iraq Survey Group who conducted a fact-finding mission to find Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programmes. In 2004 the ISG's Duelfer Report[130] stated that Iraq did not have a viable WMD program.
Post-invasion phase
On May 1, 2003, President Bush staged a dramatic visit to the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln operating a few miles west of San Diego, California. The visit climaxed at sunset with Bush's now well-known "Mission Accomplished" speech. In this nationally televised speech, delivered before the sailors and airmen on the flight deck, Bush effectively declared victory due to the defeat of Iraq's conventional forces. However, former President Hussein remained at large and significant pockets of resistance remained.
After President Bush's speech, coalition forces noticed a gradually increasing flurry of attacks on its troops in various regions, especially in the "Sunni Triangle".[131] The initial Iraqi insurgents were supplied by hundreds of weapons caches created prior to the invasion by the Iraqi army and Republican Guard.
Initially, Iraqi resistance (described by the coalition as "Anti-Iraqi Forces") largely stemmed from fedayeen and Hussein/Ba'ath Party loyalists, but soon religious radicals and Iraqis angered by the occupation contributed to the insurgency. The three provinces with the highest number of attacks were Baghdad, Al Anbar, and Salah Ad Din. Those three provinces account for 35% of the population, but are responsible for 73% of U.S. military deaths (as of December 5, 2006), and an even higher percentage of recent U.S. military deaths (about 80%.)[132]
Insurgents use guerrilla tactics including; mortars, missiles, suicide attacks, snipers, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), car bombs, small arms fire (usually with assault rifles), and RPGs (rocket propelled grenades), as well as sabotage against the petroleum, water, and electrical infrastructure.
Post-invasion Iraq coalition efforts commenced after the fall of the Hussein regime. The coalition nations, together with the United Nations, began to work to establish a stable, compliant democratic state capable of defending itself from non-coalition forces, as well as overcoming internal divisions.[133][134]
Meanwhile, coalition military forces launched several operations around the Tigris River peninsula and in the Sunni Triangle. A series of similar operations were launched throughout the summer in the Sunni Triangle. Toward the end of 2003, the intensity and pace of insurgent attacks began to increase. A sharp surge in guerrilla attacks ushered in an insurgent effort that was termed the "Ramadan Offensive", as it coincided with the beginning of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
To counter this offensive, coalition forces begin to use air power and artillery again for the first time since the end of the invasion by striking suspected ambush sites and mortar launching positions. Surveillance of major routes, patrols, and raids on suspected insurgents were stepped up. In addition, two villages, including Hussein's birthplace of al-Auja and the small town of Abu Hishma were surrounded by barbed wire and carefully monitored.
However, the failure to restore basic services to pre-war levels, where over a decade of sanctions, US and UK bombing, corruption, and decaying infrastructure had left major cities barely functioning, contributed to local anger at the IPA government.
Hunting down the Hussein regime
[In the summer of 2003, the multinational forces focused on hunting down the remaining leaders of the former regime. On July 22, a raid by the US 101st Airborne Division and soldiers from Task Force 20 killed Hussein's sons (Uday and Qusay) along with one of his grandsons. In all, over 300 top leaders of the former regime were killed or captured, as well as numerous lesser functionaries and military personnel.
Most significantly, Saddam Hussein himself was captured on December 13, 2003 on a farm near Tikrit in Operation Red Dawn.[135] The operation was conducted by the United States Army's 4th Infantry Division and members of Task Force 121. Intelligence on Saddam’s whereabouts came from his family members and former bodyguards.[136]
With the capture of Hussein and a drop in the number of insurgent attacks, some concluded the multinational forces were prevailing in the fight against the insurgency. The provisional government began training the new Iraqi security forces intended to police the country, and the United States promised over $20 billion in reconstruction money in the form of credit against Iraq's future oil revenues. Oil revenue was also used for rebuilding schools and for work on the electrical and refining infrastructure.
Shortly after the capture of Hussein, elements left out of the Coalition Provisional Authority began to agitate for elections and the formation of an Iraqi Interim Government. Most prominent among these was the Shia cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. The Coalition Provisional Authority opposed allowing democratic elections at this time.[137] The insurgents stepped up their activities. The two most turbulent centers were the area around Fallujah and the poor Shia sections of cities from Baghdad (Sadr City) to Basra in the south.
2004: Iraqi Resistance expands
- See also: Military operations of the Iraq War for a list of all Coalition operations for this period, 2004 in Iraq, Iraqi coalition counter-insurgency operations, History of Iraqi insurgency, United States occupation of Fallujah, Iraq Spring Fighting of 2004
The start of 2004 was marked by a relative lull in violence. Insurgent forces reorganised during this time, studying the multinational forces' tactics and planning a renewed offensive. However, violence did increase during the Iraq Spring Fighting of 2004 with foreign fighters from around the Middle East as well as al-Qaeda in Iraq (an affiliated al-Qaeda group), led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi helping to drive the insurgency.
As the insurgency grew there was a distinct change in targeting from the coalition forces towards the new Iraqi Security Forces, as hundreds of Iraqi civilians and police were killed over the next few months in a series of massive bombings. An organized Sunni insurgency, with deep roots and both nationalist and Islamist motivations, was becoming more powerful throughout Iraq. The Shia Mahdi Army also began launching attacks on coalition targets in an attempt to seize control from Iraqi security forces. The southern and central portions of Iraq were beginning to erupt in urban guerrilla combat as multinational forces attempted to keep control and prepared for a counteroffensive.
The most serious fighting of the war so far began on March 31, 2004, when Iraqi insurgents in Fallujah ambushed a Blackwater USA convoy led by four US private military contractors who were providing security for food caterers Eurest Support Services.[138] The four armed contractors, Scott Helvenston, Jerko Zovko, Wesley Batalona, and Michael Teague, were killed with grenades and small arms fire. Subsequently, their bodies were dragged from their vehicles by local people, beaten, set ablaze, and their burned corpses hung over a bridge crossing the Euphrates.[139] Photos of the event were released to news agencies worldwide, causing a great deal of indignation and moral outrage in the United States, and prompting an unsuccessful "pacification" of the city: the First Battle of Fallujah in April 2004.
The offensive was resumed in November 2004 in the bloodiest battle of the war so far: the Second Battle of Fallujah, described by the US military as "the heaviest urban combat (that they had been involved in) since the battle of Hue City in Vietnam."[140] Intelligence briefings given prior to battle reported that Coalition forces would encounter Chechnyan, Filipino, Saudi, Iranian, Italian, and Syrian combatants, as well as native Iraqis.[141]
During the assault, US forces used white phosphorus as an incendiary weapon against insurgent personnel, attracting controversy. The 46-day battle resulted in a victory for the coalition, with 95 US soldiers killed along with approximately 1,350 insurgents. Fallujah was totally devastated during the fighting, though civilian casualties were low, as they had mostly fled before the battle.[142]
Another major event of this year was the revelation of widespread prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib which received international media attention in April 2004. First reports of the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse, as well as graphic pictures showing US military personnel taunting and abusing Iraqi prisoners, came to public attention from a 60 Minutes II news report (April 28) and a Seymour M. Hersh article in the The New Yorker (posted online on April 30.)[143] Military correspondent Thomas Ricks claimed that these revelations dealt a blow to the moral justifications for the occupation in the eyes of many people, especially Iraqis, and was a turning point in the war.[144]
2005: Elections and transitional government
On January 31, Iraqis elected the Iraqi Transitional Government in order to draft a permanent constitution. Although some violence and a widespread Sunni boycott marred the event, most of the eligible Kurd and Shia populace participated. On February 4, Paul Wolfowitz announced that 15,000 US troops whose tours of duty had been extended in order to provide election security would be pulled out of Iraq by the next month.[145] February to April proved to be relatively peaceful months compared to the carnage of November and January, with insurgent attacks averaging 30 a day from the prior average of 70.
Hopes for a quick end to the insurgency and a withdrawal of US troops were dashed in May, Iraq's bloodiest month since the invasion. Suicide bombers, believed to be mainly disheartened Iraqi Sunni Arabs, Syrians and Saudis, tore through Iraq. Their targets were often Shia gatherings or civilian concentrations of Shias. As a result, over 700 Iraqi civilians died in that month, as well as 79 US soldiers.
The summer of 2005 saw fighting around Baghdad and at Tall Afar in northwestern Iraq as US forces tried to seal off the Syrian border. This led to fighting in the autumn in the small towns of the Euphrates valley between the capital and that border.[146]
A referendum was held in October 15 in which the new Iraqi constitution was ratified. An Iraqi national assembly was elected in December, with participation from the Sunnis as well as the Kurds and Shia.[146]
Insurgent attacks increased in 2005 with 34,131 recorded incidents, compared to a total 26,496 for the previous year.[147]
2006: Civil war and permanent Iraqi government
The beginning of 2006 was marked by government creation talks, growing sectarian violence, and continuous anti-coalition attacks. Sectarian violence expanded to a new level of intensity following the al-Askari Mosque bombing in the Iraqi city of Samarra, on February 22, 2006. The explosion at the mosque, one of the holiest sites in Shi'a Islam, is believed to have been caused by a bomb planted by al-Qaeda.
Although no injuries occurred in the blast, the mosque was severely damaged and the bombing resulted in violence over the following days. Over 100 dead bodies with bullet holes were found on February 23, and at least 165 people are thought to have been killed. In the aftermath of this attack the US military calculated that the average homicide rate in Baghdad tripled from 11 to 33 deaths per day. In 2006 the UN described the environment in Iraq as a "civil war-like situation."[148]
The current government of Iraq took office on May 20, 2006 following approval by the members of the Iraqi National Assembly. This followed the general election in December 2005. The government succeeded the Iraqi Transitional Government which had continued in office in a caretaker capacity until the formation of the permanent government.
On November 23, the deadliest attack since the beginning of the conflict occurred. Suspected Sunni Arab militants used suicide car bombs and mortar rounds on the capital's Shia Sadr City slum to kill at least 215 people and wound 257. This attack was retaliated by Shia militias who fired mortar rounds at various Sunni neighborhoods and organizations.
Iraq Study Group report and Hussein's execution
The Iraq Study Group Report was released on December 6, 2006. Iraq Study Group, made up of people from both of the major US parties, was led by former US Secretary of State James Baker and former Democratic congressman Lee Hamilton. It concluded that "the situation in Iraq is grave and deteriorating" and "U.S. forces seem to be caught in a mission that has no foreseeable end." The report's 79 recommendations include increasing diplomatic measures with Iran and Syria and intensifying efforts to train Iraqi troops. On December 18, a Pentagon report found that insurgent attacks were averaging about 960 a week, the highest since the reports had begun in 2005.[149]
Coalition forces formally transferred control of a province to the Iraqi government, the first since the war. Military prosecutors charged eight US Marines with the murders of 24 Iraqi civilians in Haditha in November 2005, 10 of them women and children. Four officers were also charged with dereliction of duty in relation to the event.[150]
Saddam Hussein was hanged on December 30, 2006 after being found guilty of crimes against humanity by an Iraqi court after a year-long trial.[151] Most of his crimes were committed when he was an ally of the US and UK.
2007: US troop "surge"
In a January 10, 2007 televised address to the US public, Bush proposed 21,500 more troops for Iraq, a job programme for Iraqis, more reconstruction proposals, and $1.2 billion for these programmes.[152] On January 23, 2007 in the 2007 State of the Union Address, Bush announced "deploying reinforcements of more than 20,000 additional soldiers and Marines to Iraq."
On February 10, 2007 David Petraeus was made commander of Multi-National Force - Iraq (MNF-I), the four-star post that oversees all coalition forces in country, replacing General George Casey. In his new position, Petraeus oversaw all coalition forces in Iraq and employed them in the new "Surge" strategy outlined by the Bush administration.[153][154] 2007 also saw a sharp increase in insurgent chlorine bombings.
On May 10, 2007, 144 Iraqi Parliamentary lawmakers signed onto a legislative petition calling on the United States to set a timetable for withdrawal.[155] On June 3, 2007, the Iraqi Parliament voted 85 to 59 to require the Iraqi government to consult with Parliament before requesting additional extensions of the UN Security Council Mandate for Coalition operations in Iraq.[156] Despite this, the mandate was renewed on December 18, 2007 without the approval of the Iraqi parliament.[157]
Pressures on US troops were compounded by the continuing withdrawal of British forces from the Basra Governorate. In early 2007, British Prime Minister Blair announced that following Operation Sinbad British troops would begin to withdraw from Basra, handing security over to the Iraqis.[158]
This announcement was confirmed in the autumn by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Blair's successor, who again outlined a withdrawal plan for the remaining UK forces with a complete withdrawal date sometime in late 2008.[159] In July Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen also announced the withdrawal of 441 Danish troops from Iraq, leaving only a unit of nine soldiers manning four observational helicopters.[160]
Planned troop reduction
In a speech made to Congress on September 10, 2007, Petraeus "envisioned the withdrawal of roughly 30,000 U.S. troops by next summer, beginning with a Marine contingent [in September]."[161] On September 14, Bush backed a limited withdrawal of troops from Iraq.[162]
Bush said 5,700 personnel would be home by Christmas 2007, and expected thousands more to return by July 2008. The plan would take troop numbers back to their level before the surge at the beginning of 2007. Controversy arose when former Secretary of State Colin Powell announced before the surge took place that there would have to be a draw down of troops by mid-2007.[163]
Effects of the surge on security
By March 2008, violence in Iraq was reported curtailed by 40-80%, according to a Pentagon report.[164] Independent reports[165][166] raised questions about those assessments. An Iraqi military spokesman claimed that civilian deaths since the start of the troop surge plan were 265 in Baghdad, down from 1,440 in the four previous weeks. The New York Times counted more than 450 Iraqi civilians killed during the same 28-day period, based on initial daily reports from Iraqi Interior Ministry and hospital officials.
Historically, the daily counts tallied by the NYT have underestimated the total death toll by 50% or more when compared to studies by the United Nations, which rely upon figures from the Iraqi Health Ministry and morgue figures.[167]
The rate of US combat deaths in Baghdad nearly doubled to 3.14/day in the first seven weeks of the "surge" in security activity, compared to previous period. Across the rest of Iraq it reduced slightly.[168][169]
On August 14, 2007 the deadliest single attack of the whole war occurred. Nearly 800 civilians were killed by a series of co-ordinated suicide bomb attacks on the northern Iraqi settlement of Qahtaniya. More than 100 homes and shops were destroyed in the blasts. US officials blamed al-Qaeda. The targeted villagers belonged to the non-Muslim Yazidi ethnic minority. The attack may have represented the latest in a feud that erupted earlier that year when members of the Yazidi community stoned to death a teenage girl called Du’a Khalil Aswad accused of dating a Sunni Arab man and converting to Islam. The killing of the girl was recorded on camera-mobiles and the video was uploaded onto the internet[170][171][172][173]
On September 13, 2007 Abdul Sattar Abu Risha was killed in a bomb attack in the city of Ramadi.[174] He was an important US ally because he led the "Anbar Awakening", an alliance of Sunni Arab tribes that opposed al-Qaeda. The latter organisation claimed responsibility for the attack.[175] A statement posted on the Internet by the shadowy Islamic State of Iraq called Abu Risha "one of the dogs of Bush" and described Thursday's killing as a "heroic operation that took over a month to prepare"[176].
There was a reported trend of decreasing US troop deaths after May 2007,[177] and violence against coalition troops had fallen to the "lowest levels since the first year of the American invasion".[178] These, and several other positive developments, were attributed to the surge by many analysts.[179]
Data from the Pentagon and other US agencies such as the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that daily attacks against civilians in Iraq remained “about the same” since February. The GAO also stated that there was no discernible trend in sectarian violence.[180] However, this report ran counter to reports to Congress, which showed a general downward trend in civilian deaths and ethno-sectarian violence since December 2006.[181] By late 2007, as the U.S. troop surge began to wind down, violence in Iraq had begun to decrease from its 2006 highs.[182]
Reports from the ground dispute that the surge had a significant effect on security in Iraq. While life in Baghdad improved in 2007-08, the main reason this was that the battle for Baghdad in 2006-07 between the Shia and the Sunni populations was won by the Shia, who as of September 2008 controlled three-quarters of the capital. These demographic changes appeared permanent; Sunni families who try to get their houses back faced assassination. Thus the war against the US occupation by the Sunni community, who had been favoured under Saddam Hussein, had largely ended. The Sunni have been largely defeated, not so much by the US army as by the Shia-led Iraqi government and the Shia militias.[183]
Entire neighborhoods in Baghdad were ethnically cleansed by Shia and Sunni militias and sectarian violence has broken out in every Iraqi city where there is a mixed population.[184][185][186] This assessment is supported by a study of satellite imagery tracking the amount of light emitted by Baghdad neighborhoods at night. The interpretation of the data was that violence had declined in Baghdad due to ethnic cleansing and that intercommunal violence had reached a climax as the surge was beginning. John Agnew, an authority on ethnic conflict and leader of the project stated "The surge really seems to have been a case of closing the stable door after the horse has bolted."[187][188]
Investigative reporter Bob Woodward cites US government sources according to which the US "surge" was not the primary reason for the drop in violence in 2007-2008. Instead, according to that view, the reduction of violence was due to newer covert techniques by US military and intelligence officials to find, target and kill insurgents, including working closely with former insurgents.[189]
In the Shia region near Basra, British forces turned over security for the region to Iraqi Security Forces. Basra is the ninth province of Iraq's 18 provinces to be returned to local security forces' control since the beginning of the occupation.[190]
Political developments
More than half of the members of Iraq's parliament rejected the continuing occupation of their country for the first time. 144 of the 275 lawmakers signed onto a legislative petition that would require the Iraqi government to seek approval from Parliament before it requests an extension of the UN mandate for foreign forces to be in Iraq, which expires at the end of 2008. It also called for a timetable for troop withdrawal and a freeze on the size of foreign forces. The UN Security Council mandate for US-led forces in Iraq will terminate "if requested by the government of Iraq."[191] Under Iraqi law, the speaker must present a resolution called for by a majority of lawmakers.[192] 59% of those polled in the U.S. support a timetable for withdrawal.[193]
In mid-2007, the Coalition began a controversial program to recruit Sunni Arabs (often former insurgents) for the formation of "Guardian" militias. These Guardian militias were intended to support and secure various Sunni neighborhoods against the Islamists.[194]
Tensions with Iran
In 2007, tensions increased greatly between Iran and Iraqi Kurdistan due to the latter's giving sanctuary to the militant Kurdish secessionist group Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan (PEJAK.) According to reports, Iran had been shelling PEJAK positions in Iraqi Kurdistan since August 16. These tensions further increased with an alleged border incursion on August 23 by Iranian troops who attacked several Kurdish villages killing an unknown number of civilians and militants.[195]
Coalition forces also began to target alleged Iranian Quds force operatives in Iraq, either arresting or killing suspected members. The Bush administration and coalition leaders began to publicly state that Iran was supplying weapons, particularly EFP devices, to Iraqi insurgents and militias although to date have failed to provide any proof for these allegations. Further sanctions on Iranian organizations were also announced by the Bush administration in the Autumn of 2007. On November 21, 2007 Lieutenant General James Dubik, who is in charge of training Iraqi security forces, praised Iran for its "contribution to the reduction of violence" in Iraq by upholding its pledge to stop the flow of weapons, explosives and training of extremists in Iraq.[196]
Tensions with Turkey
Border incursions by PKK militants based in Iraqi Kurdistan have continued to harass Turkish forces, with casualties on both sides increasing tensions between Turkey, a NATO member, and Iraqi Kurdistan.
In the fall of 2007, the Turkish military stated their right to cross the Iraqi Kurdistan border in "hot pursuit" of PKK militants and began shelling Kurdish villages in Iraq and attacking PKK bases in the Mount Cudi region with aircraft.[197][198] The Turkish parliament approved a resolution permitting the military to pursue the PKK in Iraqi Kurdistan.[199] In November, Turkish gunships attacked parts of northern Iraq in the first such attack by Turkish aircraft since the border tensions escalated.[200] Another series of attacks in mid-December hit PKK targets in the Qandil, Zap, Avashin and Hakurk regions. The latest series of attacks involved at least 50 aircraft and artillery and Kurdish officials reported one civilian killed and two wounded.[201]
Additionally, weapons that were given to Iraqi security forces by the US military are being recovered by authorities in Turkey after being used in that state.[202]
Private security firm controversy
On September 17, 2007, the Iraqi government announced that it was revoking the license of the US security firm Blackwater USA over the firm's involvement in the killing of eight civilians, including a woman and an infant,[203] in a firefight that followed a car bomb explosion near a State Department motorcade. Additional investigations of alleged arms smuggling involving the firm was also under way. Blackwater is currently one of the most high-profile firms operating in Iraq, with around 1,000 employees as well as a fleet of helicopters in the country. Whether the group may be legally prosecuted is still a matter of debate.[204]
2008: Iraqi forces arm
Throughout 2008, U.S. officials and independent think tanks began to point to improvements in the security situation, as measured by key statistics. According to the US Defense Department, in December 2008 the "overall level of violence" in the country had dropped 80% since before the surge began in January 2007, and the country's murder rate had dropped to pre-war levels. They also pointed out that the casualty figure for U.S. forces in 2008 was 314 against a figure of 904 in 2007.[205] According to the Brookings Institution, Iraqi civilian fatalities numbered 490 in November 2008 as against 3,500 in January 2007, whereas attacks against the coalition numbered somewhere between 200 and 300 per week in the latter half of 2008, as opposed to a peak of nearly 1,600 in summer 2007. The number of Iraqi security forces killed was under 100 per month in the second half of 2008, from a high of 200 to 300 in summer 2007.[206]
Meanwhile, the proficiency of the Iraqi military increased as it launched a spring offensive against Shia militias which Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki had previously been criticized for allowing to operate. This began with a March operation against the Mehdi Army in Basra, which led to fighting in Shia areas up and down the country, especially in the Sadr City district of Baghdad. By October, the British officer in charge of Basra said that since the operation the town had become "secure" and had a murder rate comparable to Manchester in England.[207] The U.S. military also said there had been a decrease of about a quarter in the quantity of Iranian-made explosives found in Iraq in 2008, possibly indicating a change in Iranian policy.[208] Progress in Sunni areas continued after members of the Awakening movement were transferred from U.S. military to Iraqi control.[209] In May, the Iraqi army - backed by coalition support - launched an offensive in Mosul, the last major Iraqi stronghold of al-Qaeda. Despite detaining thousands of individuals, the offensive failed to lead to major long-term security improvements in Mosul. At the end of the year, the city remained a major flashpoint.[210][211]
In the regional dimension, the ongoing conflict between Turkey and PKK[212][213][214] intensified on February 21, when Turkey launched a ground attack into the Quandeel Mountains of Northern Iraq. In the nine day long operation, around 10,000 Turkish troops advanced up to 25 km into Northern Iraq. This was the first substantial ground incursion by Turkish forces since 1995.[215][216] Shortly after the incursion began, both the Iraqi cabinet and the Kurdistan regional government condemned Turkey's actions and called for the immediate withdrawal of Turkish troops from the region.[217] Turkish troops withdrew on February 29.[218] The fate of the Kurds and the future of the ethnically-diverse city of Kirkuk remained a contentious issue in Iraqi politics.
U.S. military officials met these trends with cautious optimism as they approached what they described as the "transition" embodied in the U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement which was negotiated throughout 2008.[205] The commander of the coalition, U.S. General Raymond T. Odierno, noted that "in military terms, transitions are the most dangerous time" in December 2008.[205]
Spring offensives on Shia militias
At the end of March, the Iraqi Army, with Coalition air support, launched an offensive, dubbed "Charge of the Knights", in Basra to secure the area from militias. This was the first major operation where the Iraqi Army did not have direct combat support from conventional coalition ground troops. The offensive was opposed by the Mahdi Army, one of the militias, which controlled much of the region.[219][220] Fighting quickly spread to other parts of Iraq: including Sadr City, Al Kut, Al Hillah and others. During the fighting Iraqi forces met stiff resistance from militiamen in Basra to the point that the Iraqi military offensive slowed to a crawl, with the high attrition rates finally forcing the Sadrists to the negotiating table.
Following talks with Brig. Gen. Qassem Suleimani, commander of the Qods brigades of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, and the intercession of the Iranian government, on March 31, 2008, al-Sadr ordered his followers to ceasefire.[221] The militiamen kept their weapons.
By May 12, 2008, Basra "residents overwhelmingly reported a substantial improvement in their everyday lives" according to The New York Times. "Government forces have now taken over Islamic militants’ headquarters and halted the death squads and 'vice enforcers’ who attacked women, Christians, musicians, alcohol sellers and anyone suspected of collaborating with Westerners", according to the report; however, when asked how long it would take for lawlessness to resume if the Iraqi army left, one resident replied, "one day".[220]
In late April roadside bombings continued to rise from a low in January of 114 to over 250, surpassing the May 2007 high.
In early May, the Iraqi government called on the residents of Sadr City to flee after more than 40 days of fighting, which left between 500-1,000 people dead. Due to the nearly constant violence, there are ongoing shortages of food, water, and other supplies.[222]
Congressional testimony
Speaking before the U.S. Congress on April 8, 2008, General David Petraeus urged delaying troop withdrawals, saying, "I’ve repeatedly noted that we haven’t turned any corners, we haven’t seen any lights at the end of the tunnel," referencing the comments of then President Bush and former Vietnam-era General William Westmoreland.[223] When asked by Senator Evan Bayh if reasonable people could disagree on the way forward, Petraeus responded, "I don’t know if I would go that far."[224] When asked twice again about that point, Petraeus said, "We fight for the right of people to have other opinions."[225]
Upon questioning by then Senate committee chair Joe Biden, Ambassador Crocker admitted that Al-Qaeda in Iraq was less important than the Al-Qaeda organization led by Osama bin Laden along the Afghan-Pakistani border.[226] Lawmakers from both parties complained that U.S. taxpayers are carrying Iraq's burden as it earns billions of dollars in oil revenues. Democrats plan to push legislation this spring that would force the Iraqi government to spend its own surplus to rebuild.[227]
Iraqi security forces rearm
Iraq became one of the top current purchasers of U.S. military equipment with their army trading its AK-47 assault rifles for the more accurate U.S. M-16 and M-4 rifles, among other equipment.[228] This year alone, Iraq accounts for more than $12.5 billion of the $34 billion US weapon sales to foreign countries (not including the potential F-16 fighter planes.)[229]
Iraq sought 36 F-16’s, the most sophisticated weapons system Iraq has attempted to purchase. The Pentagon notified Congress that it had approved the sale of 24 American attack helicopters to Iraq, valued at as much as $2.4 billion. Including the helicopters, Iraq announced plans to purchase at least $10 billion in U.S. tanks and armored vehicles, transport planes and other battlefield equipment and services. Over the summer, the Defense Department announced that the Iraqi government wanted to order more than 400 armored vehicles and other equipment worth up to $3 billion, and six C-130J transport planes, worth up to $1.5 billion.[230][231]
Status of forces agreement
The U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement is a SOFA approved by the Iraqi government in late 2008 between Iraq and the United States. It establishes that U.S. combat forces will withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and that all U.S. forces will be completely out of Iraq by December 31, 2011. The pact is subject to possible negotiations which could delay withdrawal and a referendum scheduled for mid-2009 in Iraq which may require all U.S. forces to completely leave by the middle of 2010.[232][233] The pact requires criminal charges for holding prisoners over 24 hours, and requires a warrant for searches of homes and buildings that are not related to combat.[234] U.S. contractors working for U.S. forces will be subject to Iraqi criminal law, while contractors working for the State Department and other U.S. agencies may retain their immunity. "The immunity question, the largest question being talked about, is not addressed in the ... agreement," said Alan Chvotkin, who works on behalf of contractors, including Moyock, N.C.-based Blackwater Worldwide. Chvotkin said he believed Blackwater's guards still have immunity under Decree 17 issued by L. Paul Bremer. Blackwater currently has no license to work in Iraq.[235] If U.S. forces commit still undecided "major premeditated felonies" while off-duty and off-base, they will be subject to the still undecided procedures laid out by a joint U.S.-Iraq committee if the U.S. certifies the forces were off-duty.[236][237][234][238] On November 16, 2008, Iraq's Cabinet approved the agreement. On November 27, 2008, the Iraqi Parliament ratified the agreement. On December 4, 2008, Iraq's presidential council approved the security pact.[239] Some Americans have discussed "loopholes"[240] and some Iraqis have said they believe parts of the pact remain a "mystery".[241] U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has predicted that after 2011 he would expect to see "perhaps several tens of thousands of American troops" as part of a residual force in Iraq.[242]
Several groups of Iraqis protested the passing of the SOFA accord[243][244][245] as prolonging and legitimizing the occupation. Tens of thousands of Iraqis burned an effigy of George W. Bush in a central Baghdad square where U.S. troops five years previously organized a tearing down of a statue of Saddam Hussein.[123][241][246] Some Iraqis expressed skeptical optimism that the U.S. would completely end its presence by 2011.[247] On December 4, 2008, Iraq's presidential council approved the security pact.[239] U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has predicted that after 2011 he would expect to see "perhaps several tens of thousands of American troops" as part of a residual force in Iraq.[242] A representative of Grand Ayatollah Ali Husseini al-Sistani's expressed concern with the ratified version of the pact and noted that the government of Iraq has no authority to control the transfer of occupier forces into and out of Iraq, no control of shipments, and that the pact grants the occupiers immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts. He said that Iraqi rule in the country is not complete while the occupiers are present, but that ultimately the Iraqi people would judge the pact in a referendum.[246] Thousands of Iraqi have gathered weekly after Friday prayers and shouted anti-US and anti-Israeli slogans protesting the security pact between Baghdad and Washington. A protester said that despite the approval of the Interim Security pact, the Iraqi people would break it in a referendum next year.[248]
2009: Coalition exit from Urban areas
Transfer of Green Zone
On January 1, 2009, the United States handed control of the Green Zone and Saddam Hussein's presidential palace to the Iraqi government in a ceremonial move described by the country's prime minister as a restoration of Iraq's sovereignty. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said he would propose January 1 be declared national "Sovereignty Day". "This palace is the symbol of Iraqi sovereignty and by restoring it, a real message is directed to all Iraqi people that Iraqi sovereignty has returned to its natural status," al-Maliki said.
The U.S. military attributed a decline in reported civilians deaths to several factors including the U.S.-led "troop surge", the growth of U.S.-funded Awakening Councils, and Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's call for his militia to abide by a cease fire.[249] Majid Mola, an Iraqi engineer, dismissed the handover and asked "Where are the government services? Where is the electricity?"[250] Mohammad Mehssin, an Iraqi who lives in eastern Baghdad, said, "Until now I have tasted no happiness. I think 2009 will be like the former years."[251]
Provincial elections
On January 31, 2009, Iraq held provincial elections.[252] Provincial candidates and those close to them faced some political assassinations and attempted assassinations, and there was also some other violence related to the election.[253][254][255][256] Iraqi voter turnout failed to meet the original expectations which were set and was the lowest on record in Iraq,[257] but U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker characterized the turnout as "large".[258] Of those who turned out to vote, some groups complained of disenfranchisement and fraud.[257][259][260] After the post-election curfew was lifted, some groups made threats about what would happen if they were unhappy with the results.[261]
Exit strategy announcement
On February 27, 2009, United States President Barack Obama gave a speech at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in the U.S. state of North Carolina announcing that the U.S. combat mission in Iraq would end by August 31, 2010. A "transitional force" of up to 50,000 troops tasked with training the Iraqi Security Forces, conducting counterterrorism operations, and providing general support may remain until the end of 2011, the president added. Obama declared that this strategy for withdrawal was in line with the American goal of "a full transition to Iraqi responsibility" for the sovereign nation of Iraq. He congratulated the Iraqi people and government for their "proud resilience" in not "giving into the forces of disunion", but cautioned that Iraqis would have to remain vigilant against "those...who will insist that Iraq’s differences cannot be reconciled without more killing" even after the U.S. drawdown in 2010 and withdrawal in 2011.[262]
The day before Obama's speech, Prime Minister of Iraq Nuri al-Maliki said at a press conference that the government of Iraq had "no worries" over the impending departure of U.S. forces and expressed confidence in the ability of the Iraqi Security Forces and police to maintain order without American military support.[263]
Sixth year anniversary protests
On April 9, 2009, the sixth anniversary of Baghdad's fall to coalition forces, tens of thousands of Iraqis thronged Baghdad to mark the sixth anniversary of the city's fall and to demand the immediate departure of coalition forces. The crowds of Iraqis stretched from the giant Sadr City slum in northeast Baghdad to the square around 5 km (3 miles) away, where protesters burned an effigy featuring the face of former U.S. President George W. Bush, who ordered the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, and also the face of Saddam. Shi'ites were brutally persecuted under Saddam's rule.[264] There were also Sunni Muslims in the crowd. Police said many Sunnis, including prominent leaders such as a founding sheikh from the Sons of Iraq, took part.[265]
"I would like to register for history that America should be held accountable for the terrorism in our country," said one demonstrator. "The Americans said they want to spread democracy and freedom, but we have seen neither," he continued. Another protester declared "anyone would reject a situation of occupation upon his land and people".[265] "We demand that President Obama stand with the Iraqi people by ending the occupation to fulfill his promises he made to the world," al-Sadr aide Assad al-Nassiri told the crowd.[266]
British troops end combat operations
On April 30, 2009, the United Kingdom formally ended combat operations. Prime minister Gordon Brown characterized the operation in Iraq as a "success story" because of UK troops' efforts. Britain handed control of Basra to the United States Armed Forces.[267]
U.S. forces withdraw from Iraqi urban areas
The withdrawal of U.S. forces began at the end of June, with 38 bases to be handed over to Iraqi forces. On June 29, 2009, U.S. forces withdrew from Baghdad.
Combatants
Casualty estimates
In December 2007, the Iraqi government reported that there were 5 million orphans in Iraq - nearly half of the country's children.[40][41] For coalition death totals see the infobox at the top right. See also Casualties of the Iraq War, which has casualty numbers for coalition nations, contractors, non-Iraqi civilians, journalists, media helpers, aid workers, wounded, etc.. The main article also gives explanations for the wide variation in estimates and counts, and shows many ways in which undercounting occurs. Casualty figures, especially Iraqi ones, are highly disputed. This section gives a brief overview.
U.S. General Tommy Franks reportedly estimated soon after the invasion that there had been 30,000 Iraqi casualties as of April 9, 2003.[268] After this initial estimate he made no further public estimates.
In December 2005 President Bush said there were 30,000 Iraqi dead. White House spokesman Scott McClellan later said it was "not an official government estimate", and was based on media reports.[269]
There have been several attempts by the media, coalition governments and others to estimate the Iraqi casualties:
- USA Today count (July 17, 2009): 4,328 members of the U.S. military.[270] The AP count is one fewer than the Defense Department's tally, last updated Friday at 10 a.m. EDT.
The British military has reported 176 deaths; Italy, 33; Ukraine, 18; Poland, 21; Bulgaria, 13; Spain, 11; Denmark, seven; El Salvador, five; Slovakia, four; Latvia and Georgia, three each; Estonia, Netherlands, Thailand, Romania, two each; and Australia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, South Korea, one death each.
- Iraqi Health Ministry casualty survey: in January 2008 the Iraqi health minister, Dr Salih Mahdi Motlab Al-Hasanawi, reported the results of the "Iraq Family Health Survey" of 9,345 households across Iraq which was carried out in 2006 and 2007. It estimated 151,000 violence-related Iraqi deaths (95% uncertainty range, 104,000 to 223,000) from March 2003 through June 2006. Employees of the Iraqi Health Ministry carried out the survey for the World Health Organization.[271] The results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.[272][273][274]
- Iraq's Health Minister Ali al-Shemari said in November 2006 that since the March 2003 invasion between 100,000-150,000 Iraqis have been killed.[275] Al-Shemari said on Thursday, Nov. 9, that he based his figure on an estimate of 100 bodies per day brought to morgues and hospitals.[276]
- The United Nations found that 34,452 violent civilian deaths were reported by morgues, hospitals, and municipal authorities across Iraq in 2006.[277][278]
- The Iraqi ministries of Health, Defence and Interior said that 14,298 civilians, 1,348 police, and 627 soldiers were killed in 2006.[279] The Iraqi government does not count deaths classed as "criminal", nor those from kidnappings, nor wounded persons who die later as the result of attacks. However "a figure of 3,700 civilian deaths in October 2006, the latest tally given by the UN based on data from the Health Ministry and the Baghdad morgue, was branded exaggerated by the Iraqi Government."[280]
- The Iraq Body Count project (IBC) has documented 91,856 - 100,278 violent, non-combatant civilian deaths since the beginning of the war as of May 6, 2009.[281] However, the IBC has been criticized for counting only a small percentage of the number of actual deaths because they only include deaths reported by specific media agencies.[282][283] IBC Director John Sloboda admits, "We've always said our work is an undercount, you can't possibly expect that a media-based analysis will get all the deaths."[284]
- The 2006 Lancet survey of casualties of the Iraq War estimated 654,965 Iraqi deaths (range of 392,979-942,636) from March 2003 to the end of June 2006.[30][31] That total number of deaths (all Iraqis) includes all excess deaths due to increased lawlessness, degraded infrastructure, poorer healthcare, etc, and includes civilians, military deaths and insurgent deaths. 601,027 were violent deaths (31% attributed to Coalition, 24% to others, 46% unknown.) A copy of a death certificate was available for a high proportion of the reported deaths (92 per cent of surveyed households produced one.)[30][285] The causes of violent deaths were gunshot (56%), car bomb (13%), other explosion/ordnance (14%), air strike (13%), accident (2%), unknown (2%.) The survey results have been criticized as "ridiculous" and "extreme and improbable" by various critics such as the Iraqi government and Iraq Body Count project.[68][286][287] However, in a letter to The Age, published Oct. 21, 2006, 27 epidemiologists and health professionals defended the methods of the study, writing that the study's "methodology is sound and its conclusions should be taken seriously."
- An Opinion Research Business (ORB) survey conducted August 12-19, 2007 estimated 1,220,580 violent deaths due to the Iraq War (range of 733,158 to 1,446,063.) Out of a national sample of 1,499 Iraqi adults, 22% had one or more members of their household killed due to the Iraq War (poll accuracy +/-2.4%.)[39] ORB reported that 48% died from a gunshot wound, 20% from car bombs, 9% from aerial bombardment, 6% as a result of an accident and 6% from another blast/ordnance. It is the highest estimate given so far of civilian deaths in Iraq and is consistent with the Lancet study.[68][288] On January 28, 2008, ORB published an update based on additional work carried out in rural areas of Iraq. Some 600 additional interviews were undertaken and as a result of this the death estimate was revised to 1,033,000 with a given range of 946,000 to 1,120,000.[29]
Criticisms and costs
The U.S. rationale for the Iraq War has faced heavy criticism from an array of popular and official sources both inside and outside the United States, with many US citizens finding many parallels with the Vietnam War. According to the Center for Public Integrity, President Bush's administration made a total of 935 false statements between 2001 and 2003 about Iraq's alleged threat to the United States.[290][291] Both proponents and opponents of the invasion have also criticized the prosecution of the war effort along a number of other lines. Most significantly, critics have assailed the US and its allies for not devoting enough troops to the mission, not adequately planning for post-invasion Iraq, and for permitting and perpetrating widespread human rights abuses. As the war has progressed, critics have also railed against the high human and financial costs.
The court-martial of Ehren Watada, the first US officer to refuse to serve in Iraq, ended in a mistrial because the Judge Advocate General's Corps would not consider the question of whether orders could be illegal. A federal district court judge ruled that Watada cannot face double jeopardy on three of his five charges, but abstained from ruling on whether the two remaining charges of conduct unbecoming an officer may still go forward.[292]
Another criticism of the initial intelligence leading up to the Iraq war comes from a former CIA officer who described the Office of Special Plans as a group of ideologues who were dangerous for US national security and a threat to world peace, and that the group lied and manipulated intelligence to further its agenda of removing President Hussein.[293] Subsequently, in 2008, the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity has enumerated a total of 935 false statements made by George Bush and six other top members of his administration in what it termed a "carefully launched campaign of misinformation" during the two year period following 9-11, in order to rally support for the invasion of Iraq.[294][295]
The financial cost of the war has been more than £4.5 billion ($9 billion) to the UK,[296] and over $845 billion to the U.S., with the total cost to the U.S. economy estimated at $3 trillion.[297]
Criticisms include:
- Legality of the invasion[298][299]
- Human casualties
- Inadequate troop levels (a RAND study stated that 500,000 troops would be required for success)[300]
- Insufficient post-invasion plans
- Financial costs with approximately $612 billion spent as of 4/09 the CBO has estimated the total cost of the war in Iraq to U.S. taxpayers will be around $1.9 trillion.[301]
- Adverse effect on US-led global "war on terror"[302][303]
- Negative impact on Israel[304]
- Negative impact on Saudi Arabian regime[305]
- Endangerment and ethnic cleansing of religious and ethnic minorities[185][306][307][308][309]
- Damage to US' traditional alliances and influence
- Disruption of Iraqi oil production and related energy security concerns (the price of oil has quadrupled since 2002)[310][311]
After President Barack Obama was inaugurated in 2009 some anti-war protestors decided to stop protesting even though the war was still going on, some of them decided to stop because they felt they should give the new President time to establish his administration, and others stopped because they were convinced that the new President will end the war.[312]
Humanitarian crises
In December 2007, the Iraqi government reported that there were 5 million orphans in Iraq - nearly half of the country's children.[40][41] Iraq's health has deteriorated to a level not seen since the 1950s, said Joseph Chamie, former director of the U.N. Population Division and an Iraq specialist. "They were at the forefront", he said, referring to health care just before the 1991 Persian Gulf War. "Now they're looking more and more like a country in sub-Saharan Africa."[314] Malnutrition rates have risen from 19% before the US-led invasion to a national average of 28% four years later.[315] Some 60-70% of Iraqi children are suffering from psychological problems.[316] 68% of Iraqis have no access to safe drinking water. A cholera outbreak in northern Iraq is thought to be the result of poor water quality.[317] As many as half of Iraqi doctors have left the country since 2003.[318]
Human rights abuses
Throughout the entire Iraq war there have been human rights abuses on all sides of the conflict.
Iraqi government
- The use of torture by Iraqi security forces.[319]
- Iraqi police from the Interior Ministry accused of forming Death Squads and committing numerous massacres and tortures of Sunni Arabs[320] and the police collusion with militias in Iraq have compounded the problems.
Coalition forces and private contractors
- Haditha killings of 24 civilians (ongoing with some charges dropped)
- The torture and killing of prisoner of war, Iraqi Air Force commander, Abed Hamed Mowhoush
- Bombing and shooting of 42 civilians in Mukaradeeb[322] (under investigation)
- Controversy over whether disproportionate force was used, during the assaults by Coalition and (mostly Shia and Kurdish) Iraqi government forces on the Sunni insurgent stronghold of Fallujah in 2004.
- Planting weapons on noncombatant, unarmed Iraqis by three US Marines after killing them.[323][324] According to a report by The Nation, other similar acts have been witnessed by US soldiers.[325] Members of Iraq Veterans Against the War tell similar stories.[326]
Insurgent groups
- Killing over 12,000 Iraqis from January 2005 to June 2006, according to Iraqi Interior Minister Bayan Jabr, giving the first official count for the victims of bombings, ambushes and other deadly attacks.[327] The insurgents have also conducted numerous suicide attacks on the Iraqi civilian population, mostly targeting the majority Shia community.[328][329] An October 2005 report from Human Rights Watch examines the range of civilian attacks and their purported justification.[330]
- Attacks against civilians including children through bombing of market places and other locations reachable by car bombs.
- Attacks on diplomats and diplomatic facilities including; the bombing of the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad in August 2003 killing the top U.N. representative in Iraq and 21 other UN staff members;[331] beheading several diplomats: two Algerian diplomatic envoys Ali Belaroussi and Azzedine Belkadi,[332] Egyptian diplomatic envoy al-Sherif,[333] and four Russian diplomats.[334]
- The February 2006 bombing of the al-Askari Mosque, destroying one of the holiest Shiite shrines, killing over 165 worshipers and igniting sectarian strife and reprisal killings.[335]
- The publicised killing of several contractors; Eugene Armstrong, Jack Hensley, Kenneth Bigley, Ivaylo Kepov and Georgi Lazov (Bulgarian truck drivers.)[336] Other non-military personnel murdered include: translator Kim Sun-il, Shosei Koda, Fabrizio Quattrocchi (Italian), charity worker Margaret Hassan, reconstruction engineer Nick Berg, photographer Salvatore Santoro (Italian)[337] and supply worker Seif Adnan Kanaan (Iraqi.) Four private armed contractors, Scott Helvenston, Jerko Zovko, Wesley Batalona and Michael Teague, were killed with grenades and small arms fire, their bodies dragged from their vehicles, beaten and set ablaze. Their burned corpses were then dragged through the streets before being hung over a bridge crossing the Euphrates.[338]
- Attacks against coalition convoys and bases.
- Torture or killing of members of the New Iraqi Army,[339] and assassination of civilians associated with the Coalition Provisional Authority, such as Fern Holland, or the Iraqi Governing Council, such as Aqila al-Hashimi and Ezzedine Salim, or other foreign civilians, such as those from Kenya.[340]
Public opinion on the war
International opinion
According to a January 2007 BBC World Service poll of more than 26,000 people in 25 countries, 73% of the global population disapproves of the US handling of the Iraq War.[341] A September 2007 poll conducted by the BBC found that 2/3rds of the world's population believed the US should withdraw its forces from Iraq.[342] According to an April 2004 USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll, only a third of the Iraqi people believed that "the American-led occupation of their country is doing more good than harm, and a solid majority support an immediate military pullout even though they fear that could put them in greater danger."[343] Majorities in the UK and Canada believe the war in Iraq is "unjustified" and - in the UK - are critical of their government's support of US policies in Iraq.[344] According to polls conducted by The Arab American Institute, four years after the invasion of Iraq, 83% of Egyptians had a negative view of the US role in Iraq; 68% of Saudi Arabians had a negative view; 96% of the Jordanian population had a negative view; 70% of the UAE and 76% of the Lebanese population also described their view as negative.[345] The Pew Global Attitudes Project reports that in 2006 majorities in the Netherlands, Germany, Jordan, France, Lebanon, China, Spain, Indonesia, Turkey, Pakistan, and Morocco believed the world was safer before the Iraq War and the toppling of Hussein. Pluralities in the US and India believe the world is safer without Hussein.[346]
Iraqi opinion
The US government has long maintained its involvement there is with the support of the Iraqi people, but in 2005 when asked directly, 82–87% of the Iraqi populace was opposed to the US occupation and wanted US troops to leave. 47% of Iraqis supported attacking US troops.[347] Another poll conducted on September 27, 2006, found that seven out of ten Iraqis want US-led forces to withdraw from Iraq within one year. Overall, 78% of those polled said they believed that the presence of US forces is "provoking more conflict than it's preventing." 53% of those polled believed the Iraqi government would be strengthened if US forces left Iraq (versus 23% who believed it would be weakened), and 71% wanted this to happen in 1 year or less. All of these positions were more prevalent amongst Sunni and Shia respondents than among Kurds. 61% of respondents said that they approve of attacks on US-led forces, although 94% still had an unfavorable opinion of al-Qaeda.[348]
A March 7, 2007 survey of more than 2,000 Iraqis found that 78% of the population opposed the presence of Coalition forces in Iraq, that 69% believed the presence of U.S. forces is making things worse, and that 51% of the population considered attacks on coalition forces acceptable, up from 17% in 2004 and 35% in 2006. In addition:[349]
- 64% described their family's economic situation as being somewhat or very bad, up from 30% in 2005.
- 88% described the availability of electricity as being either somewhat or very bad, up from 65% in 2004.
- 69% described the availability of clean water as somewhat or very bad, up from 48% in 2004.
- 88% described the availability of fuel for cooking and driving as being somewhat or very bad.
- 58% described reconstruction efforts in the area in which they live as either somewhat or very ineffective, and 9% described them as being totally nonexistent.
A 2007 survey for the first time asked ordinary Iraqis their view on the highly contentious draft oil law. According to the poll, 76 percent of Iraqis feel inadequately informed about the contents of the proposed law. Nonetheless, 63 percent responded that they would prefer Iraqi state-owned companies – and not foreign corporations – to develop Iraq’s extensive oil fields.[350]
Relation to the US Global "War on Terror"
Former President Bush consistently referred to the Iraq war as "the central front in the War on Terror", and argued that if the US pulls out of Iraq, "terrorists will follow us here."[351][352][353] While other proponents of the war have regularly echoed this assertion, as the conflict has dragged on, members of the US Congress, the US public, and even US troops have begun to question the connection between Iraq and the fight against anti-US terrorism. In particular, a consensus has developed among intelligence experts that the Iraq war has increased terrorism. Counterterrorism expert Rohan Gunaratna frequently refers to the invasion of Iraq as a "fatal mistake."[354] London's conservative International Institute for Strategic Studies concluded in 2004 that the occupation of Iraq had become "a potent global recruitment pretext" for jihadists and that the invasion "galvanised" al-Qaeda and "perversely inspired insurgent violence" there.[355] The US National Intelligence Council concluded in a January 2005 report that the war in Iraq had become a breeding ground for a new generation of terrorists; David B. Low, the national intelligence officer for transnational threats, indicated that the report concluded that the war in Iraq provided terrorists with "a training ground, a recruitment ground, the opportunity for enhancing technical skills... There is even, under the best scenario, over time, the likelihood that some of the jihadists who are not killed there will, in a sense, go home, wherever home is, and will therefore disperse to various other countries." The Council's chairman Robert L. Hutchings said, "At the moment, Iraq is a magnet for international terrorist activity."[356] And the 2006 National Intelligence Estimate, which outlined the considered judgment of all 16 US intelligence agencies, held that "The Iraq conflict has become the 'cause celebre' for jihadists, breeding a deep resentment of US involvement in the Muslim world and cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement."[357]
See also
- Bush-Blair 2003 Iraq memo
- Canada and Iraq War Resisters
- Canada and the Iraq War
- Carter Doctrine
- Casualties of the Iraq War
- CIA sponsored regime change
- Complaints to the International Criminal Court
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Crime against humanity
- Criticism of the Iraq War
- Curveball (informant)
- Downing Street memo
- Foreign policy of the United States
- Governments' positions pre-2003 invasion of Iraq
- Humanitarian Crises of the Iraq War
- Human rights in post-invasion Iraq
- Human Rights Record of the United States
- International Criminal Court and the 2003 invasion of Iraq
- International Criminal Court investigations
- Iraq prison abuse scandals
- Iraq War misappropriations
- Legality of the Iraq War
- Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq
- List of Iraq War Resisters
- List of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Iraq
- List of wars 2003-current
- Media coverage of the Iraq War
- 2008 Mosul offensive
- Oil reserves in Iraq
- Opposition to the Iraq War
- Overseas interventions of the United States
- Permanent war economy
- Petrodollar warfare
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Project for the New American Century
- Protests against the Iraq War
- Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq
- Rationale for the Iraq War
- Suicide bombings in Iraq since 2003
- Torture and the United States
- Trilateral Commission
- United Nations Security Council and the Iraq War
- United States and state terrorism
- Views on the 2003 invasion of Iraq
- War crimes committed by the United States
- War of aggression
- White House Iraq-War forgery allegations/The Way of the World (book)
Demographic images of Iraq
-
The various occupation zones in Iraq.
-
Iraq governorates or muhafazat that have been handed over to Iraqi security control.Under Iraqi security control
References
- ^ New York Times: Bremer Says U.S. Was Short on Troops for Occupation of Iraq
- ^ "Sectarian divisions change Baghdad's image". MSNBC. July 3, 2006. Retrieved February 18, 2007.
- ^ "DoD News Briefing with Secretary Gates and Gen. Pace from Pentagon" (Press release). U.S. Department of Defense. February 2, 2007. Retrieved May 10, 2008.
- ^ "Private contractors outnumber U.S. troops in Iraq". By T. Christian Miller. Los Angeles Times. July 4, 2007.
- ^ a b Roberts, Michelle (February 24, 2007). "Contractor deaths add up in Iraq". Associated Press.
- ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/world/middleeast/29iraq.html?hpw
- ^ Bendern, Paul de (February 22, 2008). "Turkey launches major land offensive into N.Iraq". Reuters. Retrieved February 22, 2008.
- ^ The Brookings Institution Iraq Index: Tracking Variables of Reconstruction & Security in Post-Saddam Iraq October 1, 2007
- ^ Ricks, Thomas E. (January 11, 2007). "Intensified Combat on Streets Likely". Washington Post. p. A01.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Pincus, Walter. "Violence in Iraq Called Increasingly Complex". Washington Post, November 17, 2006.
- ^ "Toll rises in Turkey-PKK conflict". Al Jazeera. February 25, 2008.
- ^ Iraq Coalition Casualty Count: Coalition Deaths by Country
- ^ a b c d Many official U.S. tables at "Military Casualty Information". See latest totals for injury, disease/other medical. See also: Latest fatality and wounded-in-action totals.
- ^ Iraq Coalition Casualty Count: U.S. Casualties - DoD Confirmations
- ^ http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FactSheets/OperationsFactsheets/OperationsInIraqBritishFatalities.htm
- ^ "Casualties in Iraq".
- ^ a b iCasualties.org (was lunaville.org). Benicia, California. Patricia Kneisler, et al., "Iraq Coalition Casualties".
- ^ a b "Defence Internet Fact Sheets Operations in Iraq: British Casualties". UK Ministry of Defense. Latest combined casualty and fatality tables.
- ^ a b "In outsourced U.S. wars, contractor deaths top 1,000". By Bernd Debusmann. Reuters. July 3, 2007. 10,569 wounded and 933 deaths in Iraq. 224 are U.S. citizens.
- ^ "Reconstruction report: 916 death claims for civilian contractors in Iraq". USA Today April 30, 2007.
- ^ "Iraq Coalition Casualties: Contractor Deaths - A Partial List". icasualties.org
- ^ Yigal Schleifer. "Turkey's Army loses luster over PKK attack | csmonitor.com". Csmonitor.com. Retrieved October 27, 2008.
{{cite web}}
: Text "Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor" ignored (help) - ^ "The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict". Project on Defense Alternatives Research Monograph #8. Carl Conetta. October 20, 2003.
- ^ "New Study Finds: 11,000 to 15,000 Killed in Iraq War; 30% are Non-combatants". Project on Defense Alternatives. Press release October 20, 2003.
- ^ "19,000 insurgents killed in Iraq since '03". By Jim Michaels. 26 Sept. 2007. USA Today.
- ^ "Iraqis in MNF detentions down to 12,794". Aswat al-Iraq. Retrieved April 2, 2009.
- ^ "US military: More than 11,000 Iraqis freed in 2008 - Yahoo! News". News.yahoo.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ "US says 11,000 Iraq detainees freed this year - Yahoo! News". News.yahoo.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ a b c Update on Iraqi Casualty Data by Opinion Research Business, January 2008
- ^ a b c Template:PDFlink. By Gilbert Burnham, Riyadh Lafta, Shannon Doocy, and Les Roberts. The Lancet, October 11, 2006
- ^ a b Template:PDFlink. By Gilbert Burnham, Shannon Doocy, Elizabeth Dzeng, Riyadh Lafta, and Les Roberts. A supplement to the second Lancet study.
- ^ http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq
- ^ Allawi, Ali (2007). The Occupation of Iraq: Winning the War, Losing the Peace (1 ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. p. 544. ISBN 0300110154.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|accessmonth=
ignored (|access-date=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|accessyear=
ignored (|access-date=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ US Office of Personnel Management
- ^ http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FactSheets/OperationsFactsheets/OperationsInIraqBritishForcesinIraq.htm
- ^ Fox News: Iraq War 6 Years Later: Success But No 'Victory'
- ^ Las Vegas Sun: Biden visits Iraq, as bombs highlight ongoing war
- ^ "US Names Coalition of the Willing". Retrieved November 3, 2007.
- ^ a b "More than 1,000,000 Iraqis murdered". September 2007. Opinion Research Business. PDF report: [1]
- ^ a b c http://www.uslaboragainstwar.org/article.php?id=15144
- ^ a b c http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=1478
- ^ UNHCR - Iraq: Latest return survey shows few intending to go home soon. Published April 29, 2008. Retrieved May 20, 2008
- ^ Iraq: No let-up in the humanitarian crisis
- ^ a b "Iraq war illegal, says Annan". BBC News. BBC. September 16, 2004. Retrieved February 17, 2007.
When pressed on whether he viewed the invasion of Iraq as illegal, he said: "Yes, if you wish. I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter from our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal."
- ^ "Excerpts: Annan interview". BBC News. BBC. September 16, 2004. Retrieved December 12, 2006.
- ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq "Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan"
- ^ Center for American Progress (January 29, 2004) "In Their Own Words: Iraq's 'Imminent' Threat" americanprogress.org
- ^ a b Senator Bill Nelson (January 28, 2004) "New Information on Iraq's Possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction", Congressional Record
- ^ Blair, A. (March 5, 2002) "PM statement on Iraq following UN Security Council resolution" Number 10 Downing Street
- ^ a b c d Blix, H. (March 7, 2003) "Transcript of Blix's U.N. presentation" CNN.com
- ^ Hersh, Seymour M. (May 5, 2003). Selective Intelligence, New Yorker.
- ^ "Official's Key Report On Iraq Is Faulted". Washington Post. February 8, 2007. Retrieved November 4, 2008.
- ^ U.S. Senate Intelligence Community (June 2008): "Two Bipartisan Reports Detail Administration Misstatements on Prewar Iraq Intelligence, and Inappropriate Intelligence Activities by Pentagon Policy Office".
- Senator John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IVThere is a fundamental difference between relying on incorrect intelligence and deliberately painting a picture to the American people that you know is not fully accurate.
- ^ a b In his remarks to the UN Security Council on 14.2.2003 Hans Blix said on cooperation that "In my January 27 update to the Council, I said that it seemed from our experience that Iraq had decided in principle to provide cooperation on process, most importantly prompt access to all sites and assistance to UNMOVIC in the establishment of the necessary infrastructure. This impression remains and we note that access to sites has so far been without problems." On time remaining until the confirmation of disarmament he said "the period of disarmament through inspection could still be short if immediate, active and unconditional cooperation with UNMOVIC and IAEA were to be forthcoming." United Nations Security Council: 4707th meeting. Friday, February 14, 2003, 10 a.m., New York, New York, USA.
- ^ Voice of America: 19, 2003 Bush Officially Notifies Congress: Iraq Diplomacy Has Failed. NewsVOA.com, March 19, 2003.
- ^ USA Today: U.S advises weapons inspectors to leave Iraq. USATODAY.com, 3/17/2003.
- ^ "Iraq Survey Group Final Report: Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)".
- ^ Shrader, K. (June 22, 2006) "New Intel Report Reignites Iraq Arms Fight" Associated Press
- ^ "The Weekly Standard, Saddam's al Qaeda Connection".
- ^ Woods, K.M. and Lacey, J. (2008) "Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents," vol. 1 Institute for Defense Analyses IDA Paper P-4287, pp. ES-1
- ^ Kerr, R.J., et al. (July 29, 2004) "Intelligence and Analysis on Iraq: Issues for the Intelligence Community," MORI Doc. ID 1245667 (Langley, VA: Central Intelligence Agency)
- ^ CNN (September 12, 2002) "White House spells out case against Iraq", "the White House released a report early Thursday, listing some of the principal accusations against Iraq and its leader.... Iraq is also accused of sheltering two Palestinian terrorist organizations, and it lists Saddam's decision in 2002 to increase from $10,000 to $25,000 the bounty paid to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers."
- ^ Wolfowitz, P. (May 30, 2003)
- ^ "President Discusses the Future of Iraq" The White House, February 26, 2003
- ^ a b CBS (January 11, 2004) "Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq?" 60 Minutes
- ^ a b U.S. Commerce Dept. (March 2001) "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts" (obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request)
- ^ Shih, G. and Montes, S. (October 15, 2007) "Roundtable debates energy issues" Stanford Daily
- ^ a b c "Greenspan Admits Iraq was About Oil, As Deaths Put at 1.2 Million". By Peter Beaumont and Joanna Walters. Sept. 16, 2007. The Observer (UK).
- ^ Bloomberg: U.S., U.K. Waged War on Iraq Because of Oil, Blair Adviser Says
- ^ Gates denies Iraq war about oil
- ^ Blair: Iraq oil claim is 'conspiracy theory'
- ^ U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Feb 2, 2007, see "four wars" remark
- ^ "CBS on civil war". CBS News. September 26, 2006.
- ^ http://www.iraqbodycount.org/database/
- ^ Iraq Body Count: IBC in Context
- ^ "US Department of Defense (June 2008): Measuring Security and Stability in Iraq
- ^ Foreign Policy: The Failed States Index 2008
- ^ Britain's Brown visits officials, troops in Iraq. International Herald Tribune, October 2, 2007.
- ^ Italy plans Iraq troop pull-out BBC March 15, 2005
- ^ Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq
- ^ http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/SE_SFA.pdf Strategic Framework Agreement (pdf bitmap)
- ^ English Language Teaching and Learning Program (US State Dept.)
- ^ Karadsheh, J. (November 27, 2008) "Iraq parliament OKs pact on U.S. troops' future" CNN
- ^ Thomma, Steven (February 27, 2009). "Obama to extend Iraq withdrawal timetable; 50,000 troops to remain". McClatchy Newspapers.
- ^ Feller, Ben (February 27, 2009). "Obama sets firm withdrawal timetable for Iraq". Associated Press.
- ^ CNN: General: U.S. should be out of Iraq by late 2011
- ^ "UK Iraq combat operations to end". BBC News. Retrieved April 30, 2009.
- ^ FoxNews: Iraq Welcomes Faster U.S. Withdrawal Reports
- ^ Kirk, Michael (June 20, 2006). "The Dark Side". Frontline. PBS.
- ^ "Saddam's uranium headed for Ontario processing plant". Associated Press. July 5, 2008.
- ^ Duffy, Michael (July 13, 2003). "A Question of Trust". Time.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Roberts, Pat; Rockefeller, John D., IV (2004), "Niger: Former Ambassador", Report on the u.s. intelligence community's prewar intelligence assessments on iraq (PDF), United States Senate: Select Committee on Intelligence, pp. 39–47
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Rycroft, Matthew (May 1, 2005). "The secret Downing Street memo". The Sunday Times.
- ^ Blumenthal, S. (September 6, 2007) "Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction" Salon.com
- ^ Pincus, Walter (March 23, 2006). "Ex-Iraqi Official Unveiled as Spy". Washington Post.
- ^ Silberman, Laurence H.; Robb, Charles S. (2005), "Iraq", Report to the President of the United States (PDF), The Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, p. 198 "Iraq was prohibited from possessing tubes composed of 7075 T6 aluminum alloy with outer diameters exceeding 75mm under Annex III to United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 because of their potential use in gas centrifuges."
- ^ Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction
- ^ The CIA's Aluminum Tubes' Assessment: Institute for Science and International Security March 10, 2003
- ^ Spinning The Tubes Four Corners Australian Broadcasting Corporation air date October 27, 2003
- ^ "Evidence on Iraq Challenged," Joby Warrick, The Washington Post, Sept. 19, 2002
- ^ Colin Powell’s speech to the UN, Feb 5, 2003
- ^ Meet the Press, NBC, May 16, 2004
- ^ "Iraq war my biggest regret, Bush admits". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved December 2.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help); Unknown parameter|accessyear=
ignored (|access-date=
suggested) (help) - ^ Lowe, C. (December 16, 2003) "Senator: White House Warned of UAV Attack," Defense Tech
- ^ Commission of the Intelligence capabilities of the United States regarding weapons of mass destruction
- ^ Associated Press (August 24, 2003) "Iraqi Drones Not For WMD" CBS News
- ^ a b Blix's remarks January 27, 2003
- ^ American Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Washington D.C., 2003), 159-61.
- ^ Joint Declaration by Russia, Germany and France on Iraq France Diplomatie February 10, 2003
- ^ Russian/Ukrainian rebuff for Blair over Iraq The Guardian October 11, 2002
- ^ "Bush-Blair Iraq war memo revealed". BBC News Online. March 27, 2006.
- ^ "Press conference of Foreign affairs Minister Dominique de Villepin (excerpts)". Embassy of France in the U.S. January 20, 2003. Retrieved February 13, 2007.
- ^ Anti-war protests do make a difference, Alex Callinicos, Socialist Worker, March 19, 2005.
- ^ USATODAY.com - Army chief: Force to occupy Iraq massive
- ^ CNN.com - Administration fends off demands for war estimates - Mar. 3, 2003
- ^ Top judge: US and UK acted as 'vigilantes' in Iraq invasion, The Guardian, November 18, 2008
- ^ a b Operation Hotel California, The Clandestine War inside Iraq, Mike Tucker and Charles Faddis, 2008.
- ^ a b c Plan of Attack, Bob Woodward, 2004.
- ^ A NATION AT WAR: SECOND FRONT; Allied Troops Are Flown In To Airfields In North Iraq, By C. J. CHIVERS, March 24, 2003
- ^ A NATION AT WAR: IN THE FIELD THE NORTHERN FRONT; Militants Gone, Caves in North Lie Abandoned By C. J. CHIVERS, March 30, 2003
- ^ "Operation Iraqi Freedom". Target Iraq. GlobalSecurity.org. April 27, 2005.
- ^ "Press Briefing by Ari Fleischer". Office of the Press Secretary. March 24, 2003. Retrieved November 27, 2008.
March 24, 2003 [...] discussed the ongoing aspects of Operation Iraqi liberation
- ^ a b LATimes: Army Stage-Managed Fall of Hussein Statue
- ^ CBS: Iraqi Protesters Burn Bush Effigy
- ^ Collier, R. (April 9, 2003) "Baghdad closer to collapse" San Francisco Chronicle
- ^ Stuff Happens
- ^ Conetta, C. (October 20, 2003) "The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict," Research Monograph no. 8 Project on Defense Alternatives
- ^ Reuters. "Getting amputees back on their feet".Washington Post. Oct. 25, 2005.
- ^ "Iraq Coalition Casualty Count" March 19, 2003 through through May 1, 2003 (end of major combat) iCasualties.org
- ^ ISG's Duelfer Report
- ^ "Operation Iraqi Freedom Maps". GlobalSecurity.Org. Unavailable.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "iCasualties: Iraq Coalition Casualty Count - Deaths by Province Year/Month". Icasualties.org. Retrieved October 27, 2008.
- ^ "Poll: Iraqis out of patience". USA Today. April 30, 2004.
- ^ Reuters. "Gloom descends on Iraqi leaders as civil war looms".
{{cite news}}
:|author=
has generic name (help) - ^ "Pentagon: Saddam is POW". CNN. January 10, 2004.
- ^ "Saddam 'caught like a rat' in a hole". CNN. December 15, 2003.
- ^ "Why the US is Running Scared of Elections in Iraq". Guardian (London) via Common Dreams. January 19, 2004. Retrieved November 21, 2006.
- ^ "PBS.org".
- ^ Residents hang slain Americans' bodies from bridge - CNN.com
- ^ ScanEagle Proves Worth in Fallujah Fight, DefenseLINK News
- ^ Bellavia, David & Bruning, John. House to House: An Epic Memoir of War Free Press. (2007) ISBN 1-4165-7471-9.
- ^ Thomas Ricks (2006) Fiasco: 398-405
- ^ Hersh, S. (May 10, 2004) "Torture at Abu Ghraib" The New Yorker
- ^ Thomas E. Ricks (2006) Fiasco, The American Military Adventure In Iraq. Penguin
- ^ "U.S. to pull out 15,000 from Iraq". BBC News. February 4, 2005.
- ^ a b Thomas Ricks (2006) Fiasco: 413
- ^ Thomas Ricks (2006) Fiasco: 414
- ^ "Decrying violence in Iraq, UN envoy urges national dialogue, international support". UN News Centre. November 25, 2006.
- ^ "Attacks in Iraq at All-Time High, Pentagon Report Says". PBS. December 19, 2006.
- ^ "8 Marines Charged With 24 Iraqi Slayings". FOX. December 22, 2006.
- ^ "Saddam Hussein executed in Iraq". BBC. December 30, 2006.
- ^ "President's Address to the Nation". The White House. January 10, 2007.
- ^ Holusha, John (January 23, 2007). "Petraeus Calls Iraq Situation Dire". New York Times.
- ^ Gordon, Michael (January 5, 2007). "Bush to Name a New General to Oversee Iraq". The New York Times.
- ^ Iraq Bill Demands U.S. Troop WithdrawAssociated Press, Fox News, May 10, 2007
- ^ Iraqi parliament wants say in extension of US-led forces Associated Press, The Jerusalem Post, June 5, 2007
- ^ Raed Jarrar (December 20, 2007). "Bush, Maliki Break Iraqi Law to Renew U.N. Mandate for Occupation". AlterNet. Retrieved June 12, 2008.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ BBC NEWS February 21, 2007, Blair announces Iraq troops cut
- ^ Mark Deen (October 2, 2007). "Major Says Brown Playing Politics With Iraq, UK. Election". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved October 14, 2007.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Al-Jazeera ENGLISH, February 21, 2007, Blair announces Iraq troop pullout
- ^ Flaherty, A. (September 10, 2007) "Petraeus Talks of Troop Withdrawal," Associated Press
- ^ "Bush pledges Iraq troop reduction". BBC News. September 14, 2007. Retrieved September 14, 2007.
- ^ DeYoung, Karen ([December 18, 2006]). "Powell Says U.S. Losing in Iraq, Calls for Drawdown by Mid-2007". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 2, 2007.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Pentagon: Violence down in Iraq since 'surge'". CNN. June 23, 2008.
- ^ US surge has failed - Iraqi poll BBC September 10, 2007
- ^ Few See Security Gains ABC September 10, 2007
- ^ "Baghdad violence decrease debatable". By Damien Cave — The New York Times. March 15, 2007. Worcester Telegram & Gazette News.
- ^ "Patterns of War Shift in Iraq Amid U.S. Buildup : nytimes.com".
- ^ "icasualties.org".
- ^ "Search goes on as Iraq death toll tops 250" Guardian August 15
- ^ "Iraq toll could hit 500"
- ^ "They won't stop until we are all wiped out" Guardian August 18, 2007
- ^ "Toll in Iraq Bombings Is Raised to More Than 500"
- ^ "Iraqi insurgents kill key US ally". BBC News. September 13, 2007. Retrieved September 14, 2007.
- ^ Compton, Ann (September 13, 2007). "Top Sunni Sheik Killed in IED Attack". ABC News.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Mourners Vow Revenge at Sheik's Funeral - washingtonpost.com". Washingtonpost.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ U.S. Casualties in Iraq GlobalSecurity.org
- ^ US General Says Iraq Violence Down The Associated Press December 17, 2007
- ^ Iraq - the best story of the year The Times December 17, 2007
- ^ Surge hasn't curbed violence in Iraq The Australian September 5, 2007
- ^ "Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq" December 2007 Report to Congress, sec. 1.3-Security Environment, p. 18-Overall trends in violence
- ^ Nancy A. Youssef. "McClatchy Washington Bureau | 12/18/2007 | Despite drop in violence, Pentagon finds little long-term progress in Iraq". Mcclatchydc.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
{{cite web}}
: Text "McClatchy Newspapers" ignored (help) - ^ The Independent, September 15, 2008, "Iraq: Violence Is Down – But Not Because of America's 'Surge': If fewer US troops and Iraqis are being killed, it is only because the Shia community and Iran now dominate, http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2008/09/15
- ^ Sects slice up Iraq as US troops 'surge' misfires
- ^ a b Iraq is disintegrating as ethnic cleansing takes hold
- ^ "There is ethnic cleansing"
- ^ Study Of Satellite Imagery Casts Doubt On Surge's Success In Baghdad ScienceDaily September 22, 2008
- ^ Satellite images show ethnic cleanout in Iraq, Reuters, September 19, 2008
- ^ BBC News, September 5, 2008, "US 'Spying' on Iraqi Leadership" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7600077.stm citing the book "The War Within: A Secret White House History, 2006-2008" by Bob Woodward
- ^ "AFP: Iraq takes control of Basra from British army". AFP via Google. December 15, 2007. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ Abdul-Zahra, Q. (May 10, 2007) "Iraqi Bill on Troop Pullout Discussed" Washington Post accessed May 10, 2007
- ^ Jarrar, R. and Holland, J. (May 9, 2007) "Majority of Iraqi Lawmakers Now Reject Occupation" AlterNet.org retrieved May 10, 2007
- ^ Saad, L. (May 9, 2007) "Americans Favor Iraq Timetable, Don't Foresee Increased Terrorism" USA Today/Gallup poll retrieved May 10, 2007
- ^ "US uses Sunnis to patrol streets". New York Times. August 20, 2007.
- ^ Collins, Chris (August 23, 2007). "Iranians attack Kurdish rebels in Iraq". McClatchy Washington Bureau.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "US general says Iran helping stop Iraq bloodshed". Agence France Presse. November 21, 2007.
- ^ link inactive
- ^ Robertson, Nic (October 14, 2007). "Attacks cross Iraq-Turkey border". CNN.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Meixler, Louis (October 23, 2007). "Turkey May Attack Kurds Using Airstrikes, Troops". Bloomberg.
- ^ Barazanji, Yahya (November 13, 2007). "Turkish Helicopters Strike Inside Iraq". Huffington Post.
- ^ Tavernise, Sabrina (December 16, 2007). "Turkey Bombs Kurdish Militant Targets in Iraq". New York Times.
- ^ Cloud, David S. (August 30, 2007). "U.S. Weapons, Given to Iraqis, Move to Turkey". New York Times.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Glanz, James (September 28, 2007). "Blackwater Shooting Scene Was Chaotic". New York Times.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Mroue, Bassem (September 17, 2007). "Blackwater License Being Revoked in Iraq". The Guardian (London).
- ^ a b c "U.S. Deaths in Iraq Decrease in 2008"
- ^ "Iraq Index: Tracking Variables of Reconstruction and Security in Post-Saddam Iraq", Brookings Institution
- ^ "DoD News Briefing with Maj. Gen. Salmon from Iraq", U.S. Department of Defense news transcript
- ^ "US credits Iran for drop in Iraq roadside bombs". The Guardian. December 12, 2008.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help); Text "http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/12/iran-iraq" ignored (help) - ^ "Awakening fears for Iraq's future". BBC. October 1, 2008.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help); Text "http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7645647.stm" ignored (help) - ^ "Iraq: Al-Qaida intensifies its stranglehold in the world's most dangerous city". The Guardian. September 15, 2008.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help); Text "http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/15/iraq.alqaida" ignored (help) - ^ "Operation Mother of Two Springs", Institute for the Study of War commentary
- ^ EU terror list
- ^ US terror list
- ^ "NATO chief declares PKK terrorist group". Xinhua. December 20, 2005.
- ^ Bentley, Mark (February 22, 2008). "Turkish Army Begins Ground Assault on PKK in Iraq". Bloomberg.
- ^ "Gov't gives no timetable for return". Turkish Daily News. February 26, 2008.
- ^ Kamber, Michael (February 27, 2008). "Iraq Cabinet Demands Turks Leave Kurdish Area in North". New York Times.
- ^ Torchia, Christopher (February 29, 2008). "Turkish Troops Withdraw from Iraq". Associated Press.
- ^ Dagher, Sam (March 26, 2008). "Across Iraq, battles erupt with Mahdi Army". Christian Science Monitor. p. 2.
- ^ a b Stephen Farrell and Ahmar Karim (May 12, 2008). "Drive in Basra by Iraqi Army Makes Gains". The New York Times. Retrieved May 12, 2008.
- ^ Fadel, Leila (March 30, 2008). "After Iranian mediation, firebrand Iraqi cleric orders halt to attacks". McClatchy Newspapers.
- ^ Fadel, Leila (May 8, 2008). "Iraqi military orders Sadr City residents to evacuate". McClatchy Newspapers.
- ^ Zremski, J. (4/09/08) "Petraeus urges withdrawal delay" Buffalo News
- ^ Grim, R. (April 8, 2008) "Petraeus: No Corners Turned Or Lights At The End Of The Tunnel" CBS News
- ^ Smith, S.A. (April 9, 2008) "Senators grill Petraeus," Indiana Journal-Gazette
- ^ Ambinder, M. (April 9, 2002) "Biden's Audition?" The Atlantic
- ^ [2][dead link ]
- ^ Iraqi forces load up on U.S. arms
- ^ Business as usual for US arms sales
- ^ Iraq Seeks F-16 Fighters (Wall St. Journal)
- ^ Re-Arming Iraq (Center for American Progress)
- ^ BBC News (November 27, 2008) "Iraqi parliament backs US pullout"
- ^ White House: Iraq Status of Forces Agreement
- ^ a b Status of Forces Agreement Cite error: The named reference "sofatext" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Washington Post: New year brings less clarity to Blackwater in Iraq
- ^
Arms Control Center: How Comfortable is the U.S.-Iraq SOFA?On the other hand, Iraq has primary legal jurisdiction over off-duty soldiers and civilians who commit "major and premeditated crimes" outside of U.S. installations. These major crimes will need to be defined by a joint committee and the United States retains the right to determine whether or not its personnel were on- or off-duty. Iraq also maintains primary legal jurisdiction over contractors (and their employees) that have contracts with the United States.
- ^
Los Angeles Times: In Iraq, transfer-of-power committees have yet to take shapeCommittees assigned to deal with U.S.-led combat operations and jurisdiction over U.S. military personnel are among those that have not met even as Iraq moves toward sovereignty, U.S. Army Gen. Ray Odierno told reporters.
- ^ Rubin, A. (November 27, 2008) "Iraqi Parliament approves security pact" International Herald Tribune
- ^ a b Zawya: Iraq presidential council endorses US security pact
- ^ McClatchy: U.S. staying silent on its view of Iraq pact until after vote
- ^ a b Washington Post: Top Shiite Cleric in Iraq Raises Concerns About Security Pact
- ^ a b New York Times: Trying to Redefine Role of U.S. Military in Iraq
- ^ "Iraq: Cleric al-Sadr calls for peaceful protests" (Associated Press)
- ^ SOFA not sitting well in Iraq
- ^ Iraqi refugees in Syria protest against military pact with US
- ^ a b Al Jazeera: Iraqi people will judge on U.S. pact
- ^ Feelings are mixed as Iraqis ponder U.S. security agreement
- ^ Iraqis hold anti-US rally in Baghdad
- ^ CNN: Iraqi civilian deaths down in January
- ^ International Herald Tribune: Iraqi troops take charge of Baghdad's Green Zone
- ^ Los Angeles Times: Iraqi troops take control of Green Zone
- ^ Steven Lee Myers America’s Scorecard in Iraq February 7, 2009 New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/weekinreview/08myers.html
- ^ The New York Times: A Top Sunni Survives an Attack in Iraq
- ^ Trend News: Gunmen kill Iraqi soldier south of Baghdad
- ^ Washington Post: Province Candidate Killed In Iraq
- ^ New York Times: Violence Across Iraq Kills 13, Including a Sunni Politician
- ^ a b Centre Daily: Low turnout in Iraq's election reflects a disillusioned nation
- ^ Los Angeles Times: Iraq vote turnout fails to meet expectations
- ^ MSNBC: Iraq: Sunni tribal leader says he can prove fraud
- ^ Middle East Online: Iraq's Sadrists complain of vote fraud
- ^ International Herald Tribune: Election results spur threats and infighting in Iraq
- ^ "Obama's Speech at Camp Lejeune, N.C." The New York Times. February 27, 2009.
- ^ Bel Aiba, Ines (February 26, 2009). "Iraq not fazed by pending US pullout: Maliki". AFP.
- ^ The Star: Six years on, huge protest marks Baghdad's fall
- ^ a b Miami Herald: Tens of thousands of Iraqis rally against U.S.
- ^ Chron.com: Shiite rally marks anniversary of fall of Baghdad
- ^ BBC: UK combat operations end in Iraq
- ^ "Secretary of Defense Interview with Bob Woodward - Oct 23, 2003". United States Department of Defense: News Transcript. April 19, 2004. Retrieved August 9, 2006.
- ^ Bush: Iraqi democracy making progress. CNN' December 12, 2005.
- ^ As wars' death toll nears 5,000, Dover shows quiet dignity. USA Today' July 17, 2009.
- ^ WHO country office in Iraq. Iraq Family Health Survey. World Health Organization (WHO.)
- ^ Alkhuzai AH, Ahmad IJ, Hweel MJ, Ismail TW; et al. (2008). "Violence-Related Mortality in Iraq from 2002 to 2006". N Engl J Med. 358 (2): 484–93. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0707782. PMID 18184950.
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "New study says 151,000 Iraqi dead". BBC News Online. January 10, 2008.
- ^ "151,000 civilians killed since Iraq invasion". By Sarah Boseley. January 10, 2008. The Guardian.
- ^ "Iraqi health minister estimates as many as 150,000 Iraqis killed by insurgents". International Herald Tribune. Nov. 9, 2006.
- ^ "Iraqi death toll estimates go as high as 150,000". Taipei Times. Nov 11, 2006.
- ^ "Iraqi Death Toll Exceeded 34,000 in '06, U.N. Says". By Sabrina Tavernise. New York Times. Jan. 17, 2007.
- ^ "Many organisations keep track of Iraqi casualties — but no one knows the correct number for sure". By Associated Press. International Herald Tribune. Jan. 16, 2007.
- ^ "Bruised and battered: Iraqi toll crosses 16000 in ’06". By the Associated Press January 2, 2007. The Indian Express Jan. 3, 2007.
- ^ "Iraq civilian deaths hit new record. By Alastair Macdonald. The Australian. Jan. 2, 2007.
- ^ Iraq Body Count project.
- ^ "The Media Ignore Credible Poll Revealing 1.2 Million Violent Deaths In Iraq". Sept. 18, 2007. MediaLens.
- ^ "Iraq Body Count - Media Lens responds". BBC. April 28, 2006.
- ^ Fuller, David. (April 28, 2006) "Virtual war follows Iraq conflict". BBC Newsnight
- ^ "The Iraq deaths study was valid and correct". The Age. October 21, 2006
- ^ "Could 650,000 Iraqis really have died because of the invasion?". By Anjana Ahuja. The Times. March 5, 2007.
- ^ Reality checks: some responses to the latest Lancet estimates Iraq Body Count. October 16, 2006.
- ^ "Poll: Civilian Death Toll in Iraq May Top 1 Million". By Tina Susman. Sept. 14, 2007. Los Angeles Times. (Convenience link at Commondreams.org)
- ^ "Iraq". Forces: U.S. & Coalition/Casualties. CNN. 2008.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Center for Public Integrity: False Pretenses
- ^ NPR: Group: 'Orchestrated Deception' by Bush on Iraq
- ^ Bernton, H. (October 22, 2008) "Watada won't be retried on 3 of 5 counts" Seattle Times
- ^ "Revealed: The Secret Cabal Which Spun for Blair," Sunday Herald, Neil Mackay, June 8, 2003
- ^ False Pretenses, Center for Public Integrity Jan 23, 2008
- ^ 935 Iraq Falsehoods, Dan Froomkin, Jan 23, 2008
- ^ "UK. Spending on War in Iraq, Afghanistan Rises to $16 Bln (December 2006)". Bloomberg. December 6, 2006. Retrieved January 22, 2007.
- ^ Iraq war hits U.S. economy: Nobel winner
- ^ War critics astonished as US hawk admits invasion was illegal, The Guardian, November 20, 2003
- ^ Top judge: US and UK acted as 'vigilantes' in Iraq invasion, The Guardian, November 18, 2008
- ^ "RAND Review | Summer 2003 - Burden of Victory". Rand.org. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ "U.S. CBO estimates $2.4 trillion long-term war costs | Politics | Reuters". Reuters.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ Iraq war was terrorism 'recruiting sergeant', The Guardian, September 28, 2006
- ^ Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Hurting U.S. Terror Fight, The Washington Post, September 23, 2006
- ^ Israel warns of Iraq war 'earthquake', BBC News, February 7, 2003
- ^ Saudis warn US over Iraq war, BBC News, February 17, 2003
- ^ Iraq's Mandaeans 'face extinction'
- ^ Iraq's Yazidis fear annihilation
- ^ Christians, targeted and suffering, flee Iraq
- ^ Assyrians Face Escalating Abuses in "New Iraq"
- ^ "Light Crude Oil (CL, NYMEX): Monthly Price Chart". Futures.tradingcharts.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ Iraq to revive oil deal with China
- ^ After six years, peace vigil ends, Times-Herald, March 20, 2009
- ^ "In Iraq, an Exodus of Christians". ABC News. May 14, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
- ^ Decrepit health care adds to toll in Iraq. Louise Roug, Los Angeles Times, November 11, 2006.
- ^ "Hunger, disease spread in Iraq".
- ^ "Traumatised Iraqi children suffer psychological damage".
- ^ Cholera spreads in Iraq as health services collapse
- ^ Medics beg for help as Iraqis die needlessly
- ^ "Iraq: Torture Continues at Hands of New Government". Human Rights News. January 25, 2005.
- ^ Dexter Filkins (November 29, 2005). "Sunnis Accuse Iraqi Military of Kidnappings and Slayings". The New York Times.
- ^ "BBC NEWS | Americas | Iraq rape soldier jailed for life". News.bbc.co.uk. Last Updated:. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - ^ Neil Mackay (March 14, 2004). "Iraq: The Wedding Party Massacre". Sunday Herald.
- ^ "2 GI's charged with murder of Iraqis - International Herald Tribune". Iht.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ "Multi-National Force - Iraq - Additional Soldier charged with murder". Mnf-iraq.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ About Chris Hedges Chris Hedges, former Middle East bureau chief for the New York Times , is a senior fellow at The Nation Institute. He is the author, with Laila Al-Arian, of Collateral Damage and an earlier book, American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America (Free Press). more... About Laila Al-Arian Laila Al-Arian is a freelance journalist and co-author, with Chris Hedges, of Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi Civilians (Nation Books), based on their 2007 Nation article "The Other War." more... "The Other War: Iraq Vets Bear Witness". Thenation.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
{{cite web}}
:|author=
has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "The Raw Story | Anti-war veterans' group: War crimes are 'encouraged'". Rawstory.com. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ Ellen Knickmeyer (June 3, 2005). "Iraq Puts Civilian Toll at 12,000". The Washington Post.
- ^ Paul McGeough (February 2, 2005). "Handicapped boy who was made into a bomb". The Sydney Morning Herald.
- ^ Iraq bombing toll rises. The Age July 2, 2006
- ^ A Face and a Name. Civilian Victims of Insurgent Groups in Iraq. Human Rights Watch October 2005.
- ^ "Who are the Iraq Insurgents?". NewsHour with Jim Lehrer. June 12, 2006.
- ^ "Kidnappers Kill Algerian Diplomats". Free Internet Press. July 27, 2005.
- ^ "Captors kill Egypt envoy to Iraq". BBC News. July 8, 2005.
- ^ "Russian diplomat deaths confirmed". BBC News. June 26, 2006.
- ^ Alex Rodriguez, Iraqi shrine blast suspect caught (paid archive), The Chicago Tribune June 29, 2006.
- ^ "Insurgents kill Bulgarian hostage: Al-Jazeera". CBC News. July 14, 2004.
- ^ "Foreign hostages in Iraq". CBC News. June 22, 2006.
- ^ 4 Contractors murdered by al Qaeda
- ^ Sabrina Tavernise (June 19, 2005). "Iraqis Found in Torture House Tell of Brutality of Insurgents". The New York Times.
- ^ "Iraq kidnappings stun Kenya press". BBC News. July 23, 2004.
- ^ "World View of US Role Goes from Bad to Worse" (PDF). BBC World Service. January 23, 2007. Retrieved May 23, 2007.
- ^ "Most people 'want Iraq pull-out'". BBC NEWS. September 7, 2007.
- ^ Soriano, Cesar (April 28, 2004). "Poll: Iraqis out of patience". USA Today. Gannett Co. Retrieved May 24, 2007.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Guardian July Poll" (PDF). ICM Research. 2006.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Zogby, James (2007). "Four Years Later: Arab Opinion Troubled by Consequences of Iraq War" (PDF). Arab American Institute.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ "India: Pro-America, Pro-Bush". Pew Global Attitudes Project. Pew Research Center. February 28, 2006.
- ^ "What the Iraqi Public Wants" -A WorldPublicOpinion.org Poll-, Program on International Policy Attitudes, January 31, 2006
- ^ "The Iraqi Public on the US Presence and the Future of Iraq" (PDF). World Public Opinion. September 27, 2006. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
- ^ Iraq Poll conducted by D3 Systems for the BBC, ABC News, ARD German TV and USA Today. More than 2,000 people were questioned in more than 450 neighbourhoods and villages across all 18 provinces of Iraq between February 25 and March 5, 2007. The margin of error is + or – 2.5%.
- ^ Iraqis Oppose Oil Development Plans, Poll Finds (August 6, 2007) (Oil Change International, Institute for Policy Studies, War on Want, PLATFORM and Global Policy Forum)
- ^ Bush, President George W. (September 9, 2003). "A Central Front in the War on Terror". Global Message. The White House.
- ^ Garamone, Jim (September 19, 2002). "Iraq Part of Global War on Terrorism, Rumsfeld Says". American Forces Press Service.
- ^ Bush, President George W. (August 21, 2006). "Press Conference by the President". Peace in the Middle East. The White House.
- ^ Gunaratna, Rohan (Summer 2004). "The Post-Madrid Face of Al Qaeda". Washington Quarterly. 27 (3): 98. doi:10.1162/016366004323090278.
- ^ Sengupta, Kim (May 26, 2004). "Occupation Made World Less Safe, Pro-War Institute Says". The Independent.
- ^ Priest, Dana (January 14, 2005). "Iraq New Terror Breeding Ground". Washington Post.
- ^ "Declassified Key Judgments of the National Intelligence Estimate "Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the United States"" (PDF) (Press release). Office of the Director of National Intelligence. April 2006.
External media
- Books
- David Bellavia (2007) House to House: an Epic of Urban Warfare. Simon and Schuster. About the 2nd Battle of Fallujah - written by a participant.
- Michael R. Gordon (2006) Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq
- Thomas E. Ricks (2006) Fiasco, The American Military Adventure In Iraq. Penguin.
- Edward O'Connell (2008) Counterinsurgency in Iraq: 2003-2006. RAND.
- Richard North (2009) Ministry of Defeat: the British War in Iraq 2003-2009. Continuum.
- News
- Electronic Iraq: Daily news and analysis from Iraq with a special focus on the Iraqi experience of war.
- News from Iraq: Aggregated news on the war, including politics and economics.
- Iraq: Transition of Power: CNN Special Report: Three years later, debate rages.
- Iraq war stories, a Guardian and Observer archive in words and pictures documenting the human and political cost, The Guardian, Tuesday April 14, 2009.
- Economics
- Dollar cost of war: total U.S. cost of the Iraq War
- Analysis
- "Bleak Pentagon study admits 'civil war' in Iraq, by Rupert Cornwell, The Independent, March 16, 2007
- Maps of Iraq
- High resolution maps of Iraq, GulfWarrior.org.
- Road to War
- "White House Meeting Memorandum," details of January 31, 2003 private meeting between George W. Bush and Tony Blair in which they discussed using U.S. spyplanes in UN colours to lure Saddam Hussein into war.
- UK Attorney-General leak, legal advice given to British Prime Minister Tony Blair weeks before the 2003 invasion, Channel 4, Great Britain.
- Presidential address by George W. Bush on the evening of March 19, 2003, announcing war against Iraq.
- Bibliography
- Bibliography: The Second U.S. - Iraq War (2003- )
- Iraqi sources
- "Iraq Diaries," Iraqis writing about their experiences of war at ElectronicIraq.net.
- Opinions and polls
- "1st Major Survey of Iraq". Zogby International, September 10, 2003.
- Iraq at Polling Report.com. Chronological polls of Americans 18 & older
- Public Agenda Confidence in U.S. Foreign Policy Index – Tracking survey of Americans' attitudes on international relations, conducted for Foreign Affairs
- Combat operations related
- Aerial Propaganda Leaflet Database. Psywar.org, November 6, 2005. (Iraq War PSYOP leaflets and posters)
- Judiciary
- Just War in Iraq 2003 pdf Legal dissertation by Thomas Dyhr from University of Copenhagen.
- Articles with dead external links from September 2008
- Articles that may be too long from October 2009
- 2003 Iraq conflict
- 2003 in Iraq
- 2004 in Iraq
- 2005 in Iraq
- 2006 in Iraq
- 2007 in Iraq
- 2008 in Iraq
- 2009 in Iraq
- Conflicts in 2003
- Conflicts in 2004
- Conflicts in 2005
- Conflicts in 2006
- Conflicts in 2007
- Conflicts in 2008
- Conflicts in 2009
- George W. Bush administration controversies
- History of Iraq
- Modern history
- Occupation of Iraq
- Politics of Iraq
- Iraq – United States relations