Jump to content

In re Kansas Indians

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In re Kansas Indians
Argued April 2, 1867
Decided May 6, 1867
Full case nameThe Kansas Indians
Citations72 U.S. 737 (more)
5 Wall. 737; 18 L. Ed. 667
Case history
PriorBlue-Jacket v. Johnson County Com'rs, 3 Kan. 299 (1865); Miami County Com'rs v. Wan-zop-pe-che, 3 Kan. 364 (1865)
Holding
The state of Kansas was not authorized to levy taxes on, and seize for forfeiture, lands which are set aside for Indian tribes by the United States government, under treaty or otherwise.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Salmon P. Chase
Associate Justices
James M. Wayne · Samuel Nelson
Robert C. Grier · Nathan Clifford
Noah H. Swayne · Samuel F. Miller
David Davis · Stephen J. Field
Case opinion
MajorityDavis, joined by unanimous
Superseded by
Statute, as stated in Ariz. v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, 463 U.S. 545 (1983)

In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. (5 Wall.) 737 (1867), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the state of Kansas was not authorized to levy taxes on, and seize for forfeiture, lands which are set aside for Indian tribes by the United States government, under treaty or otherwise.

Background

[edit]

The Kansas Indians case developed from three separate cases. Both Kansas and New York tried to tax the land of individual Indians.[1] The Shawnee tribe moved to Kansas from Ohio and Missouri from 1825 to 1831, and were not to be considered part of the land of any state.[2] In 1854, the tribe partitioned the land among its members, with the restriction that the land could not be sold without the permission of the United States.[3] The Wea tribe was in a similar position, as was the Miami tribe.[4]

In all three cases, the local counties levied property taxes on land belonging to members of the tribe, and the tribes objected. The Kansas Supreme Court heard two of the cases, and ruled that the taxes were proper as the Indians held fee simple title to the land.[5]

Supreme Court

[edit]

Justice David Davis delivered the opinion of the Court. The Court held that a state could not levy taxes on the property of a tribe while the tribe was recognized by the United States.[6]

References

[edit]

The citations in this article are written in Bluebook style. Please see the talk page for more information.

  1. ^ Carole Goldberg, The State-Tribe Relationship, in 2 Handbook of North American Indians: Indians in Contemporary Society 68 (Garrick A. Bailey & William C. Sturtevant eds. 2008).
  2. ^ In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. (5 Wall.) 737, 738-39 (1867) (procedural preface to opinion of the Court).
  3. ^ In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. at 740 (preface).
  4. ^ In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. at 741-42 (preface).
  5. ^ In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. at 750-51 (preface).
  6. ^ Lincoln B. Smith, Indians, in 3 Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties 745 n.23 (Charles J. Kappler ed. 1913).
[edit]