Cofán language
Cofán | |
---|---|
Aʼingae | |
Native to | Ecuador, Colombia |
Ethnicity | Cofán people |
Native speakers | 1,000 (2012)[1] |
Latin script | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | con |
Glottolog | cofa1242 |
ELP | Cofán |
Aʼingae, commonly known as Cofán or Kofán, is the primary language of the Aʼi (Cofán) people, an indigenous group whose ancestral territory lies at the interface between the Andean foothills and Amazonia in the northeast of Ecuador (Sucumbíos province) and southern Colombia (Putumayo & Nariño provinces).
While past classifications have identified Cofán as belonging to linguistic families such as Chibchan[2] or Andean B,[3] it is now widely agreed to be a language isolate, with no known genetic relatives.[4][5][6][7] Although still robustly learned by children in Ecuadorian communities, it is considered an 'endangered' language with estimates of around 1500 native speakers.
History and current status
[edit]Aʼingae is a language isolate of Amazonia spoken by the Cofán people in Sucumbios Province in northeastern Ecuador and the departments of Putumayo and Nariño in southern Colombia. The language has approximately 1500 speakers and is relatively vital in Ecuador and severely endangered in Colombia.[7] However, language attitudes about Aʼingae are positive and it is considered foundational to Cofán identity and community (Cepek 2012).
The Aʼi are traditionally hunter-gatherers who historically spanned over a large territory (AnderBois et al. 2019). In Ecuador, the Cofán have resisted conquest by the Inca and colonization by the Spanish, as well as anti-indigenous policies by the Ecuadorian government. The pre-Colombian Cofán population is estimated at 60,000 to 70,000. Though the origin of the Cofán is the Eastern Andean Cordilleras, Inca encroachment pushed the Cofán to the eastern lowlands, which they still inhabit today. The Cofán have undergone de facto segregation codified by the Ecuadorian government, a measles outbreak in 1923 that reduced the population to a few hundred, and illegal oil extraction that threatened the environment in Cofán territory and the Cofán way of life. The Cofán have played a major role in the Indigenous movement in Ecuador, and in 2018 they won a judicial case recognizing their right to decide over environmental activities in their territory and prohibiting the continued operation of mining activities.[7]
The Cofán's religious tradition is shamanistic, and a key cultural value of the Cofán is harmonious conviviality. In addition, participation in cultural practices such as drinking yaje and traditional skills like hunting and housebuilding, rather than descent or ethnicity, plays a large role in determining one's status as an aʼi (Cepek 2012). The Cofán credit their strong linguistic identity for their ability to withstand colonial oppression and protect their traditional way of life.[7]
Aʼingae is a language isolate. The language has considerable Amazonian borrowings from Tukanoan and Cariban languages, as well as many Quechuan borrowings. While there have been previous claims of genetic ties or language contact of Aʼingae to Barbacoan, Chicham, and Chibchan, it has been determined that there are no substantial borrowings.[8] No complete grammar of the language has been produced.[5]
The name of the language, Aʼingae, which consists of the stem aʼi ('person, Cofán person, civilized person') and the manner clitic =ngae, means 'in the manner of the people'. Though the speakers use the word Aʼingae, the language is also known by the Spanish denomination Cofán.
Phonology
[edit]Aʼingae has 27 consonants as well as 5 oral monophthongs and 6 oral diphthongs, each with a nasal counterpart which is contrastive. The language is currently considered to have an unknown amount of dialectal variation. It is quite likely that there is some, but no concrete research and evidence has been put forward to make a strong claim either way, warranting further investigation.[8]
Consonants
[edit]The 27 consonant phonemes are listed below in the table with their IPA representations. In Aʼingae, there is a three-way, contrastive distinction between voiceless, aspirated, and prenasalized plosives and affricates. There are no such distinctions for fricatives. All consonants can be word-initial, except for /ʔ/ and /ɰ/. Note that glottal stop, although phonologically contrastive, can be realized as creakiness.[8]
Labial | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Glottal | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plosive/ Affricate |
plain | p | t | t͡s | t͡ʃ | k | ʔ |
aspirated | pʰ | tʰ | t͡sʰ | t͡ʃʰ | kʰ | ||
prenasal | ᵐb | ⁿd | ⁿd͡z | ⁿd͡ʒ | ᵑg | ||
Fricative | f | s | ʃ | h | |||
Nasal | m | n | ɲ | ||||
Approximant | ʋ | j | ɰ | ||||
Tap | ɾ |
Vowels
[edit]The 5 oral vowels and their nasal counterparts are listed in the table below with their IPA representation. The 6 diphthongs and their nasal counterparts in IPA representation are the following: [ai]/[ãĩ], [oe]/[õẽ], [oa]/[õã], [oi]/[õĩ], [ɨi]/[ɨ̃ĩ], and [ao]/[ãõ].
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
High | i / ĩ | ɨ / ɨ̃ | |
Mid | e / ẽ | o / õ | |
Low | a / ã |
Diphthongs
[edit]When vowels appear adjacent to one another, they either become a diphthong (for the pairs listed above) or a glide is inserted if a diphthong does not exist for that pair. For example:
Note that the vowel pair /ae/ is realized as [ai].
Triphthongs do not exist in Aʼingae, and glottal stops are inserted phonemically when a sequence of three vowels would occur as in example (1) below.[5]
Nasalization
[edit]Nasalization is a major feature of the Aʼingae sound system. As already seen, there are contrastive prenasalized consonants as well as contrastive nasal counterparts to all monophthongs and diphthongs. Example (4) below demonstrates their contrasting nature:
- (4a) /hi/ [hi] 'to come'
- (4b) /hĩ/ [hĩ] 'to exist'
Along with being contrastive, nasalization also plays a key phonological role in the surface realization of morphemes, working both backwards and forwards. The consonants /p/, /t/, /ʋ/, and /j/ all become nasalized when following a nasal vowel, becoming /ᵐb/, /ⁿd/, /m/, and /ɲ/, respectively, as in examples (5) and (6).
- (5a) /ha-pa/ [ha.pa] (go-SS) 'to go'
- (5b) /hẽ-pa/ [hẽ.ᵐba] (sound-SS) 'to sound'
- (6a) /hi-ʔja/ [hiʔ.ja] (come-VER) 'does come'
- (6b) /hĩ-ʔja/ [hĩʔ.ɲã] (exist-VER) 'does exist'
Note that nasalization of vowels can cross consonant boundaries when the vowels are separated by a glottal fricative /h/ or glottal stop /ʔ/ (even when a glide is present) as in example (*) above and example (7) below:[5]
- (7a) /tsɨi-ʔhe/ [tsɨiʔ.he] (walk-IPFV) 'walking'
- (7b) /tsõ-ʔhe/ [tsõʔ.hẽ] (do-IPFV) 'doing'
Additionally, oral vowels become nasalized when preceding prenasalized consonants and when following nasal consonants.
They also become nasalized when either preceded or followed by a nasal vowel, as in examples (10) and (11).
- (10) /ho.ʋaʔ.kã.o/ [ho.ʋaʔ.kãõ] (DIST=SIM=AUG) 'exactly like that'[5]: 4
Syllable structure
[edit]Aʼingae syllable structure is (C)V(ʔ),[8] with many variations thereof. At minimum a syllable can be a singular vowel and at maximum can be consonant onset with a diphthong nucleus and glottal stop coda.[5] Note that vowel length is not a relevant feature in syllable structure. A complete list of the structures allowed is given in the table below with examples for each.[5]
V | [a.ʔi] | 'person' |
VV | [ãĩ] | 'dog' |
CV | [tʃã] | 'mother' |
CVV | [kʰoa] | 'pumpkin' |
Vʔ | [iʔ.fa] | 'we/they/you all bring' |
VVʔ | [aiʔ.ʋo] | 'body' |
CVʔ | [paʔ.tʃo] | 'dead' |
CVVʔ | [dʒaiʔ.tʃo] | 'chair' |
Prosody
[edit]Generally speaking, in the absence of a glottal stop, stress in Aʼingae is found on the penultimate syllable as in examples (12a) and (12b). When a glottal stop is present however, stress is found on the syllable with the second mora before the glottal stop (Dąbkowski, 2020), compare examples (13a) and (13b). This is a stress pattern that is currently cross-linguistically unattested.
- (12a) [ˈfe.tʰa] 'open'
- (12b) [fe.ˈtʰa.hi] 'open-PRCM'[clarification needed]
- (13a) [ˈfe.tʰa.ʔhe] 'open-IPFV'
- (13b) [fɨn.ˈdɨi.ʔhe] 'sweep-IPFV'
Stress can in some cases be contrastive, compare (14a) and (14b).
Morphology
[edit]Morphology in Aʼingae consists of stems, clitics, and suffixes.[5] Free stems include nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbials, and meteorological stems (such as words for "wind", "rain", and "sun").
tsa
ANA
sinjûnkhû
valley
rande
big
tsampi
forest
sepakhue-fa
behind-CLF:lateral
‘that big valley behind the forest’ (elic.) [5]: 21
While many stems are free, there are also a number of bound stems, which typically express states of being or properties, and are in a class of "flexible stems" by themselves. In the following sentence, bia "long" is one of these bound stems.
tutu-fa-’khu=ve=tsû
white-CLF:lateral=AUG=ACC.IRR=3
bia-ña=’fa=’ya
long-CAUS=SBJ.PL=ASS
‘They lengthened (the cotton) into white rope.’ [5]: 9
Beyond stems, Aʼingae has both bound suffixes and clitics, specifically enclitics that appear after the stem. There are no known prefixes or proclitics. In glossed content, suffixes are typically notated with a hyphen, and clitics are notated with an equal sign. The language has a very rich inventory of clitics, that can appear either at sentence level or constituent level. Sentence-level clitics occur at second position, meaning they attach to the end of the first word in a sentence, and mark qualities such as subject and sentence type.
atesû=ti=ki
know=INT=2
ke=ja
2.SG=CNTR.TOP
Secoya
Secoya
a’i=ma
person=ACC.REAL
‘Do you know Secoya people?’ [5]: 10
Constituent-level clitics can either attach to the noun phrase or subordinate clause, or to the predicate clause. Clitics in the noun phrase occur in a fixed order, and can mark case, negation, and other grammatical features.
jingesû
HORT
ja-ye
go-INF
tsa
ANA
a’i
person
cerveza=ma
beer=ACC.REAL
chava-en-je=ni
buy-CAUS-IPFV=LOC
‘Let’s go to where that man is selling beer.’ (elic.) [5]: 11
Suffixes also mark certain grammatical features. Some example include sentential type/mood, nominalization, and aspect. Passive, causative, and shape features are also indicated with suffixes.
jungue=sû=ma=tsû
IGNR2=ATTR=ACC.REAL=3
ñua’me
really
tsetse’pa=ve
chicha=ACC.IRR
tsetse’pa-en-ñe
chicha-CAUS-INF
atesû=’fa
HAB.AUX=SBJ.PL
‘What did they use to make chicha with?’ [5]: 29
Also present in the language is the process of reduplication, which expresses iterative aspect.
Tsunsi
tsun=si
do=DS
chapejuen
chape=ju=en
soften=SH.SFC=ADV
akesi
ake=si
warm.up=DS
kikhûkhûpa
kikhû~khû=pa
hurl~ITER=SS
"Then they cook and when they're warmed up, we crush them."[9]
Inflectional template
[edit]Clitics and suffixes in the language have a relatively fixed order of how they will attach to a verb or predicate phrase.[10]
causative | -ɲa (CAUS) | |
reciprocal | -kʰo∅ (RECP) | |
passive | -je∅ (PASS) | |
aspect |
| |
associated motion |
| |
subject number | -ʔfa (PLS) | |
reality | -ja (IRR) | |
polarity | -ᵐbi (NEG) | |
clause type
|
subordinate |
|
cosubordinate |
| |
matrix |
| |
information structure |
| |
sentence-level |
| |
subject person |
|
Pronouns
[edit]Singular | Plural | |
---|---|---|
1st person | ña "I, my" | ingi "we, our" |
2nd person | ke "you, your" | ke'i "you all, your" |
3rd person | tise "he/she/it, his/her/its" | tisepa "they, their" |
1st person | =ngi |
---|---|
2nd person | =ki |
3rd person | =tsû |
Syntax
[edit]Constituent order in matrix clauses in Aʼingae is relatively flexible, with SOV (or SO-predicate) considered basic.[5] In embedded clauses, word order is more rigidly SOV/SOPred. Clauses must minimally consist of a predicate.
chava=ngi
buy=1
fûesû
OTHER
simba-’khu=ma
fishing-CL:angular=ACC.REAL
‘I bought a different fishing hook.’ (elic.) [5]: 23
kanjen
stay
‘He stayed’ [5]: 38
Subordinate clauses are strictly predicate-final.
ña=ja
I=CNTR.TOP
asithaen=ngi
think=1
[kinikhu=ve
tree=ACC.IRR
da-ye]
become-INF
‘I think I’ll become a tree.’ [5]: 44
Case and alignment
[edit]Case markers are constituent-level clitics.[5]
tayupi=ja
former=CNTR.TOP
charapa
charapa.turtle
dû’sûchu=ve
egg=ACC.IRR
kaje=ni
downriver=LOC
ja-je=’fa=’ya
go-IPFV=PL=ASS
‘In earlier times they used to go downriver for charapa eggs.’ [5]: 35
The full list of case markers is shown below.
=ma | ACC1 | accusative 1 |
=ve/=me | ACC2 | accusative 2 |
=mbe | BEN | benefactive |
=i'khû | INST | instrument |
=pi | LIM | limitative |
=ni | LOC | locative |
=ngae | MANN | manner, path |
=ne | ABL | ablative |
=nga | DAT | dative |
=ye / =ñe | ELAT | elative |
Note that there are two accusative case markers. Accusative 2 typically is used in negative sentences or when the P-argument is not yet present or does not exist, in contexts of expressing desire, causation, or creation.
Sentences follow a nominative-accusative pattern. Aʼingae displays optional agreement—optional agreement in person using second position clitics, and optional agreement in number using the clitic ='fa--both of which agree with the subject argument. Within the noun phrase, there is no agreement.
Sentence type
[edit]Aʼingae distinguishes between several different sentence types.[5] These distinctions are indicated using different morphosyntactic strategies. Declarative sentences can contain the optional veridical clitic ='ya. There are several imperative types, depending on what speech act is being performed, using either the imperative clitics =ja or ='se or the diminutive suffix ='kha. There is a distinction between yes/no interrogative and content interrogative sentences, with the former using the interrogative clitic =ti and the latter using the indeterminate/interrogative wh-word in the initial position (jungaesû ("what"), maki ("when"), mani ("where"), majan ("which"), mikun ("why"), mingae ("how")). Exhortative sentences use the hortative particle jinge. Prohibitive sentences use the clitic =jama. Below are some examples of these sentence types.
Assertive/Declarative
[edit]Imperative
[edit]injan=’fa=kha
think=PL=DIM
‘Mind you!/Be careful!’ [5]: 41
Yes/no-Interrogative
[edit]Content Interrogative
[edit]Prohibitive
[edit]Writing system
[edit]Aʼingae has two principal orthographies, both using the Latin alphabet. The first was developed by missionaries Marlytte and Roberta Borman, and first employed in M. Borman (1962).[11] This orthography was influenced by Spanish and thus contained some needless complexity such as representing the phoneme /k/ with ⟨qu⟩ before front vowels, and with ⟨c⟩ elsewhere. Borman also conveyed aspirated obstruents via reduplication instead of via <h> insertion like in the modern orthography. More recently, the Cofán community has created and widely adopted a new writing system which aimed to solve some of the opacities of Borman's script. A comparison between the two orthographies can be observed in the tables below:
IPA | Borman | Community | IPA | Borman | Community |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
/p/ | p | /ⁿdz/ | ndz, dz[a] | ||
/pʰ/ | pp | ph | /ⁿdʒ/ | ndy, dy | |
/t/ | t | /f/ | f | ||
/tʰ/ | tt | th | /s/ | s | |
/k/ | c, qu | k | /ʃ/ | sh | |
/kʰ/ | cc, qqu | kh | /h/ | j | |
/ʔ/ | ʼ | /m/ | m | ||
/ts/ | ts | /n/ | n | ||
/tsʰ/ | tss | tsh | /ɲ/ | ñ | |
/tʃ/ | ch | /ɾ/ | r | ||
/tʃʰ/ | cch | chh | /ʋ/ | v | |
/ᵐb/ | mb, b[b] | /j/ | y | ||
/ⁿd/ | nd, d | /ɰ/ | g | ||
/ᵑɡ/ | ng, g |
- ^ Both Borman and Community orthographies show inconsistency between the use of ⟨dz⟩ and ⟨z⟩.
- ^ The prenasalized voiced stops and affricates are written without a homorganic nasal at the beginning of words. This is because word-initially, voiced stops are realized with less nasality than they are word-medially, hence the orthographic representation. However Repetti-Ludlow et al. (2020)[8] found that there is still some nasalisation present.
IPA | Borman | Community | IPA | Borman | Community |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
/a/ | a | /ã/ | an, a | ||
/e/ | e | /ẽ/ | en, e | ||
/i/ | i | /ĩ/ | in, i | ||
/o/ | o | u | /õ/ | on, o | un, u |
/ɨ/ | u | û | /ɨ̃/ | un, u | ûn, û |
Examples
[edit]Aʼingae | English gloss |
---|---|
kase'te | hello (morning) |
kuse kuse | hello (evening) |
jû | yes |
me'in | no |
dasû | OK; goodbye |
Mingae ki | How are you? |
Chiga tsû afepuenjan | Thank you (lit. "May God pay you") |
Pañambingi | I don't understand |
Ñutshi tsû | That's good; good |
Chigai'khû | Goodbye (lit. "God with you") |
Junguesû tsû? | What is this? |
Majan tsû? | Who is it? |
Junguesû inise ki? | What is your name? |
Ña inise tsû ____. | My name is ____. |
kûi'khû | banana drink |
tsa'u | house |
a'i | person; Cofán person |
ña; aña'chu | meat |
na'e | river |
panzaye | to hunt |
khuvû | moon |
kue'je | sun |
Sample
[edit]Aʼingae passage
[edit]The following text is The North Wind and the Sun translated into Aʼingae.
Umbaʼkhûniʼsû
[õˈᵐba.kʰɨ.ni.sɨ
Fingian
ˈfĩ.ᵑɡiã
tuyakaen
ˈto.ja.kãe
kueʼjete
koḛ.ˈhe.te
afaʼkhuʼjeʼfa
a.ˈfã̰.kʰo.he.fa
majan de
ˈmã.jã.ⁿde
tiʼtshe
ˈti.t͡sʰɨi
kiʼanʼkhe,
ˈkĩ.jã.kʰẽ
tsunʼjeninde
ˈt͡sõ̰.hẽ.nĩ.ⁿde
jakanʼsû
ˈha.kã̰.sɨ
tuʼmbia
ˈto.ᵐbia̰
saʼvutshia
ˈsa̰.ʋɨ.t͡sʰia
upûiʼjenga
oˈpuḭ.hẽ.ᵑɡa
findiyeʼchu
fĩ.ˈdi.je.t͡ʃo
ji
ˈhi]
The North Wind and the Sun were disputing which was the stronger, when a traveler came along wrapped in a warm cloak.
Tansiʼfate tsa
[tã.ˈsḭ̃.fa.te.t͡sa
majan
ˈmã.hã
uʼtie
ˈo̰.tiḛ
tise
ˈti.se
jakansû
ˈha.kã.sɨ
findiyeʼchu
fi.ˈⁿdi.jḛ.t͡ʃo
upûiʼjema
o.ˈpuḭ.hẽ.mã
ushiʼchhachhu
u.ˈʃiʔ.t͡ʃʰa.t͡ʃʰo
tiʼtshe
kiʼañe
kĩ.jã.nẽ]
They agreed that the one who first succeeded in making the traveler take his cloak off should be considered stronger than the other.
Tsumbate,
[ˈt͡sõ.ᵐba.te
umbaniʼsû
ˈõ.ᵐba.ni.sɨ
fingian
fĩ.ᵑɡiã
ûʼfa kiaʼme
ˈɨ.fakiã̰.mẽ
tise
ˈti.se
ushaʼfanga,
ˈu.ʃa̰.fã̰.ᵑɡa
tsama
ˈt͡sa.ma
tise
ˈti.se
tiʼtshe
ˈti.t͡sʰe
ûfaʼni
ˈɨ.fa̰.ni
jakanʼsû
ˈha.kã.sɨ
tise
ˈti.se
upûiʼjema
o.ˈpuḭ.hẽ.mã
findi;
ˈfĩ.ⁿdi
usefaʼpanga
o.ˈse.faʔ.pã.ᵑɡa
umbakhûniʼsû
õ.ˈᵐba.kʰɨ.nḭ.su
fingian
ˈfĩ.ᵑɡiã
ushambipa
u.ˈʃã.ᵐbi.pa
anthe
ã.tʰḛ]
Then the North Wind blew as hard as he could, but the more he blew the more closely did the traveler fold his cloak around him; and at last the North Wind gave up the attempt.
Tsunsite
[ˈt͡sõ.si.te
kueʼje
ˈkoe.he
savutshi
ˈsaʔ.ʋɨ.t͡si
chanʼjun,
ˈt͡ʃã.hɨ
tsuinʼkhûte
t͡sɨ̃ḭ̃.kɨ.tḛ
favatsheyi
fa.ˈʋa.t͡sɨi
jacanʼsu
ˈha.kã̰.sɨ
tise
ˈti.se
upûiʼjema
o.ˈpuḭ.he.mã
ushicha
u.ˈʃi.t͡ʃʰa]
Then the Sun shone out warmly, and immediately the traveler took off his cloak.
Tsumbate
[ˈt͡so.ᵐbaʔ.tḛ
umbaniʼsû
ˈõ.ᵐba.ni.su
fingian
ˈfĩ.ᵑɡia
tansiʼñaʼchovedaʼya
tã.ˈsi.jã̰.t͡ʃo.ʋe.ˈda̰.ja
tsa
t͡sa
kueʼje
ˈkoḛ.he
khuaʼnginga
ˈkʰua̰.ᵑɡi.ᵑɡa
inʼjani
ˈĩʔ.ha.ni
tiʼtshe
ˈti.t͡sʰe
kianʼkhe.
ˈkĩ.jã.kʰḛ̃]
And so the North Wind was obliged to confess that the Sun was the stronger of the two.[8]
Further reading
[edit]- Dąbkowski, Maksymilian. 2021. Aʼingae (Ecuador and Colombia) - Language Snapshot. Language Documentation and Description 20, 1-12.
- Baldauf, R. B., Kaplan, R. B., King, K. A., & Haboud, M. (2007). Language planning and policy in Latin America: Language Planning and Policy in Ecuador (Vol. 1). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Borman, M. B. (1962). "Cofan phonemes". In Elson, Benjamin; Peeke, Catherine (eds.). Studies in Ecuadorian Indian languages: I. SIL International Publications in Linguistics. pp. 45–59. Retrieved March 10, 2017.
- Borman, M. B. (1976). Vocabulario cofán: Cofán-castellano, castellano-cofán. (Serie de vocabularios indígenas Mariano Silva y Aceves, 19). Quito: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
- Borman, M. B. (1977). "Cofan paragraph structure and function". SIL International Publications in Linguistics. 52 (3): 289–338. Retrieved March 10, 2017.
- Borman, M. B. (1990). Cofan cosmology and history as revealed in their legends: The Cofan Alphabet. Quito, Ecuador: Instituto Linguistico de Verano.[12]
- Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian, eds. (2016). "Cofán". Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
- Gijn, E. V., Haude, K., & Muysken, P. (2011). Subordination in native South-American languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.[13]
- Klein, H. E., & Stark, L. R. (2011). South American Indian languages: retrospect and prospect. Austin: University of Texas Press.
References
[edit]- ^ Cofán at Ethnologue (25th ed., 2022)
- ^ Rivet, Paul (1924). Antoine Meillet; Marcel Cohen (eds.). "Langues américaines". Langues de l'Amérique du Sud et des Antilles. Les langues du monde (in French). 2. Paris: Société Linguistique de Paris.
- ^ Greenberg. Joseph H. (1960), The general classification of Central and South American languages. In: Anthony Wallace ed., Men and cultures: Selected papers of the 5th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (1956). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 791-794.
- ^ Adelaar, Willem F.H. with Pieter C. Muysken (2004), The languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 454.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al Fischer, Rafael; Hengeveld, Kees, Aʼingae (Cofán/Kofán) (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on Sep 29, 2022
- ^ "Las construcciones relativas 'superlibres' en lenguas mayas ['Super-free' relative constructions in Mayan languages]" -- AnderBois, Scott, Miguel Oscar Chan Dzul, Jessica Coon, Juan Jesús Vázquez Álvarez, Conference on Indigenous Languages of South America (CILLA) IX, The University of Texas at Austin.
- ^ a b c d Dąbkowski, Maksymilian (2021). "Aʼingae (Ecuador and Colombia) - Language Snapshot". Language Documentation and Description. 20: 1–12.
- ^ a b c d e f Repetti-Ludlow, Chiara; Zhang, Haoru; Lucitante, Hugo; AnderBois, Scott; Sanker, Chelsea (December 2020). "Aʼingae (Cofán)". Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 50 (3): 431–444. doi:10.1017/S0025100319000082. ISSN 0025-1003. S2CID 198596111.
- ^ a b c "Aʼingae Language Documentation Project". cofan-aldp.github.io. Retrieved 2021-11-15.
- ^ a b Dąbkowski, Maksymilian (2021). "Dominance is non-representational: evidence from Aʼingae verbal stress". Phonology. 38 (4): 611–650. doi:10.1017/S0952675721000348. ISSN 0952-6757. S2CID 246999014.
- ^ Borman, M. B. (1962). Elson, Banjamin (ed.). "Cofán Phonemes" (PDF). Studies in Ecuadorian Indian Languages: I. Instituto Lingüístico de Verano: 45–59. doi:10.1086/465008.
- ^ Borman, M. B. (1990-01-01). Cofan cosmology and history as revealed in their legends. Instituto Linguistico de Verano.
- ^ Gijn, Rik van; Haude, Katharina; Muysken, Pieter (2011-04-29). Subordination in Native South American Languages. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN 9789027287090.