Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger
| Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided April 18, 2017 | |
| Full case name | Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger |
| Docket no. | 15-1406 |
| Citations | 581 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| When a court sanctions bad-faith conduct by ordering a litigant to pay the other side’s legal fees, the award is limited to the fees the innocent party incurred solely because of the bad-faith misconduct. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
| Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that when a court sanctions bad-faith conduct by ordering a litigant to pay the other side’s legal fees, the award is limited to the fees the innocent party incurred solely because of the bad-faith misconduct.[1][2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, No. 15-1406, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |