Jump to content

Freedom of Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Freedom of Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
CourtConstitutional Court of South Africa
Full case name Freedom of Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others
Decided18 September 2019 (2019-09-18)
Citation[2019] ZACC 34
Case history
Prior actionYG v S [2017] ZAGPJHC 290
Appealed fromHigh Court, Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg
Court membership
Judges sittingMogoeng CJ, Basson AJ, Cameron J, Dlodlo AJ, Froneman J, Goliath AJ, Khampepe J, Mhlantla J, Petse AJ and Theron J
Case opinions
Decision byMogoeng
Keywords
corporal punishment in the home, children's rights

Freedom of Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others [2019] ZACC 34 is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which found that corporal punishment in the home is illegal. The court found that the common law defence of "moderate and reasonable chastisement" is unconstitutional, so that parents are no longer exempt from prosecution or conviction for assault for striking their children.[1] The unanimous judgment was written by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng and handed down on 18 September 2019.

Reactions to the decision were mixed.[2][3] Freedom of Religion South Africa, the Christian lobbying group which had been party to the case, described the decision as "dangerous" and "destructive".[4] It was welcomed by children's rights groups including Save the Children South Africa[4] and the Children's Institute at the University of Cape Town,[5] as well as by the Department of Social Development.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Sibanda, Omphemetse S (22 September 2019). "Ruling banning the spanking of children is both legally and morally sound". Daily Maverick. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  2. ^ "Mixed reaction to Constitutional Court's ruling over spanking of children". 702. 18 September 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  3. ^ Lindwa, Buhle (18 September 2019). "South Africa divided over ConCourt's corporal punishment ruling". The South African. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  4. ^ a b Mitchley, Alex (18 September 2019). "Spanking ban is dangerous, destructive and disturbing, says lobby group". News24. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  5. ^ "Spanking your child at home is now officially illegal, following ConCourt ruling". The Citizen. 18 September 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  6. ^ "Social Development welcomes Constitutional Court judgment on child discipline" (Press release). Pretoria: Department of Social Development. 19 September 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
[edit]