Jump to content

Dupree v. Younger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dupree v. Younger
Decided May 25, 2023
Full case nameDupree v. Younger
Docket no.22-210
Citations598 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
A post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinion
MajorityBarrett, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Fed. R. Civ. P. 50

Dupree v. Younger, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment.[1][2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Dupree v. Younger, No. 22-210, 598 U.S. ___ (2023).
  2. ^ "Court rules for Maryland prison official on procedural issue". SCOTUSblog. May 31, 2023. Retrieved November 14, 2024.
[edit]
  • Text of Dupree v. Younger, No. 22-210, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.