Jump to content

Draft talk:Thilo Stadelmann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disclosing COI

[edit]

Thilostadelmann (talk) 12:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Things that need attention

[edit]

Dear all, I created that article (COI disclosed, see above/user page) based on the public German version, and by taking inspiration from the layout of the articles on Andrej Karpathy and Bernhard Schölkopf. I wold be particularly happy on feedback on the following points (just edit the article if the answer is clear):

- "Institutions" within the box: The company (TWT Science & Innovation) is relatively small and hence has no page; is it anyway noteworthy to mention it? Otherwise, just remove and keep the academic afiliation (ZHAW). As for a reference for it, I took inspiration from the reference in Andrej Karpathy's article to his Google Scholar profile for the "Fields", and referenced the LinkedIn profile; but I am in doubt whether this makes sense. Please just remove if not.

- Interlanguage links: I am still struggling with the correct syntax for the few occasions where there is no wikipedia Article in EN, hopefully I can resolve it myself soon

- External links: In the article on Andrej Karpathy, there is a special syntax for the Google Scholar profile, whereas here is just the plain web source link. Is there a preference for either? In Addition, the German articles on scientists have links to their personal and institutional websites as well, which is why they are added here as well. Shall that be removed?

Otherwise, the article is a straightforward translation from the content in the public German article on Thilo Stadelmann. The only added new facts are the fellowship of the ECLT and senior membership of IEEE, because this is more relevant in the international context. Does it make sense to keep it? Thilostadelmann (talk) 13:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

resolved - thanks for the help! Thilostadelmann (talk) 18:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improving sources

[edit]

It would be helpful to mark sources deemed potentially unreliable, too close, or primary (outside of the "research" section). Then, alternatives can be sought explicitly for those. Thilostadelmann (talk) 09:05, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

resolved (replaced references to youtube and linkedin) - thanks for the help! Thilostadelmann (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]