This page is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature articles
This page is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! Join in | Fix a red link | Add content | Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory articles
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature articles
Hi Horcruxraven,
I am working on ensuring that women who critique and write electronic literature and are notable in the field are represented accurately in wikipedia. Maybe we could work together on these articles? Thanks! LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 14:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted the list of papers as we do have ELMCIP now as an authoritative source.
Papers
Nuclear Family: Blondie and the End of History by Stephanie Boluk
Metagame by Stephanie Boluk
Just Humanities by Stephanie Boluk
Dwarven Epitaphs: Procedural Histories in Dwarf Fortress by Stephanie Boluk
Serial Death and the Zombie: The Networked Necronomics of Left 4 Dead by Stephanie Boluk
Stretched Skulls: Anamorphic Fames and the Memento Mortem Mortis by Patrick LeMieux and Stephanie Boluk
Hundred Thousand Billion Fingers: Seriality and Critical Game Practices by Patrick LeMieux and Stephanie Boluk
Annotating Adventure by Patrick LeMieux and Stephanie Boluk
Generation Zombie (Introduction) by Stephanie Boluk
Infection, Media, and Capitalism: From Early Modern Plagues to Postmodern Zombies by Stephanie Boluk LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott
HI Ian, I think that Stephanie Boluk is notable, but mostly because Metagaming has influenced the gaming academic thought. Should we just do an article on Metagaming instead?
Review: Boluk and LeMieux’s Metagaming: - First Person Scholar states" that " an excellent primer on metagames and metagaming. It also constitutes the most comprehensive rumination on the properties and boundaries of metagaming to date."http://www.firstpersonscholar.com/review-of-boluk-and-lemieuxs-metagaming/
Rhizomes 2018 review also explains that metagaming examines what games do and how they work within larger possible contexts. ruben.pdf (rhizomes.net)
NPROF Criteria
The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
Metagaming does have a significant impact, and it is her research...
LoveElectronicLiterature: The biography could be improved by cutting back on the primary sources and drawing on secondary sources such as published reviews. Article reviewers tend to refuse articles which rely heavily on primary sources. (One or two primary sources can be included in external links.) It would be far better to reduce the large number of references and structure the article around just a few secondary sources including reviews. These could also be used for an article on Metagaming. See First Person Scholar, Trevor Ruben, Project Muse. So I think there should both be a biography of Boluk and a separate article on the book Metagaming. See if you can first improve the biography along these lines and let me know when you would like me to look at it again. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Ipigott Thanks for your help. I have done more research, and almost all the reviews are for Metagaming, and it might just be easier to explain that article. This work would be of interest to video gamers as well. I have expanded the Metagaming description into a separate article.
Moreover, I have now created three articles which have not been notable per Wikipedia. I understand this is a problem for all electronic literature as our reviews do not tend to be in notable periodicals, etc. So I do not want to ruffle any more feathers and I used a progress page this time. I added about 5 journals.
Could you look at this space? Should I send this in?