This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Silvia Suteu is a legal scholar in the field of comparative constitutional law, who has acquired notability as a scholar in this branch of law due to her leading role in large-scale research grants, her publication of policy-relevant research, and, more recently, her appointment to a chair at the European University Institute. This first draft draws from her bios at the EUI and her previous employer (UCL), also including external references from her ICON-S award and the major grant in which she is involved. Hopefully, those links can show how adding a page about her would contribute to Wikipedia's coverage of living legal academics, and I am happy to support further efforts to refine this draft. As part of the contract that generates my conflict of interest, I have done my best to craft a page that describes her contribution with reference mostly to sources authored by others, and avoiding partiality and original research. Longicaudis (talk) 15:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the re-submission, I added a secondary source to show that the EUI is a "major institution" for the purposes of Criterion 5 of WP:NACADEMIC. I also added links to publications of hers in established legal journals, to contribute towards Criterion 1. Longicaudis (talk) 08:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]