Draft talk:Jersey City Free Public Library

Separate articles..(?)

Don't think it's wise to create separate articles for any of the branches, even if they are of special merit. To contextualise much of info would have to be repeated, we see some of it is already in the "history" and "main library" sections. The article JCFPL certainly not too long that a split would be warranted. Djflem (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's very fair. I think I was a little overeager at first... -- MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 18:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff (not needed)

Ready to go?

Think after one more go-thru for small errors and addition of categories article is ready to publish. Yes? Djflem (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, it's looking good! -- MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 22:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have gone ahead published it at the pre-existing redirect and credited it to the draft you started. Can now doing logo. Djflem (talk) 09:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]