Draft talk:Electric Assisted Vehicles

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Article acceptance

The initial rejection of this page was correct - nearly all the citations essentially came from press releases of the company. I have updated the article (business has moved, new CEO), and also added some info and a cite of an FT article which I think satisfies the 'reliability' 'independent' and 'secondary sources' criteria. The britishbuiltcars.co.uk reference is also secondary and independent.

But the docs like https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_sourcing_mistakes_(notability) talk about sources plural, so do I need to find/wait-for a _second_ reliable, secondary reference before it is worth resubmitting? Wookey (talk) 02:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]