Draft talk:Barron Trump

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

United States Presidents: Donald Trump

	This draft is within the scope of WikiProject United States Presidents, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of United States Presidents on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States PresidentsWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United States PresidentsUnited States Presidents
	This page is supported by the Donald Trump task force.

Conservatism

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism

Politics

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

Submission requirements, why aren't they met?

There seems to be 2 issues:

- The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations

What exactly isn't met here? there are 29 sources, the footnotes are used properly, as for the type of statements (I checked 5, not all) they abide by the rules.

- This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article (Basically stated by Dan arndt as : The only coverage is because he is the president's son - nothing to establish notability in his own right.)

This is true, he is first and foremost the president's son, but because Donald Trump is the 2nd most popular wikipedia page, this in of itself should make Barron qualifiable (to have his page) as being direct family to Donald Trump. Donald has mentioned Barron several times publicly, including when Barron was present (for exemple, during the inauguration)

Also, he has been politically involved with his father's 2024 campaign, if a lack of sources is the problem, please state it.

With that, I will add another source and information of the page, and resubmit, if it gets rejected, please detail on what the problem is HenriDeadMort (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it helps, I decided to create a source assessment table to keep track of sources, and I encourage you and other editors to help fill in the remaining blanks wherever you can. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 16:45, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added a good bit to the assessment. More questions about reliability and significant coverage remain, for others who want to dig into it. —ADavidB 14:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and completed the significant coverage column. —ADavidB 14:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think now the citations are fine. See my edit if its good. @Adavidb :) Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 18:14, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good to me, I assess articles and I have seen articles that no where near the quality of this one. I would rate it at least Start-class and maybe even C-class in it's current form. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 20:56, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]