Draft:TRUST Principles
| Submission declined on 4 September 2024 by Cowboygilbert (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
TRUST is the acronym for Transparency, Responsibility, User Focus, Sustainability, and Technology. An extensive definition was first published in a May 2020 article in the Nature Research journal, Scientific Data.[1] The purpose of the development of the TRUST Principles is to provide a common framework to facilitate discussion and implementation of best practices in digital preservation by stakeholders including, but not limited to, repository managers, funders, policymakers, publishers, data preservationists, and researchers.
Definition
[edit]| Principle | Guidance for repositories |
|---|---|
| Transparency | To be transparent about specific repository services and data holdings that are verifiable by publicly accessible evidence. |
| Responsibility | To be responsible for ensuring the authenticity and integrity of data holdings and for the reliability and persistence of its service. |
| User Focus | To ensure that the data management norms and expectations of target user communities are met. |
| Sustainability | To sustain services and preserve data holdings for the long-term. |
| Technology | To provide infrastructure and capabilities to support secure, persistent, and reliable services. |
The CC BY licenses of the article permits the reproduction of the table.[2] For more information on licensing, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Endorsements and community adoption
[edit]Organizations world-wide have endorsed the TRUST Principles for Digital Repositories, with some offering supporting statements. Endorsing organizations include scientific societies, repositories, publishers, research sponsors, universities, libraries, and departments. The current list of organizations is available at the Research Data Alliance's website.[3]
The scholarly community's response to the publication of the TRUST paper is reported by Google Scholar[4] and Altmeric.[5]
Relationship with other data management and data sharing principles
[edit]The TRUST principles are complementary to the FAIR data principles[6] and the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance.[7] Aspects of TRUST principles are exemplified in trustworthy digital repository certification standards, such as CoreTrustSeal,[8] nestorSeal,[9] and ISO 16363.[10]
References
[edit]- ^ Lin, Dawei; Crabtree, Jonathan; Dillo, Ingrid; Downs, Robert R.; Edmunds, Rorie; Giaretta, David; De Giusti, Marisa; L'Hours, Hervé; Hugo, Wim; Jenkyns, Reyna; Khodiyar, Varsha; Martone, Maryann E.; Mokrane, Mustapha; Navale, Vivek; Petters, Jonathan (2020-05-14). "The TRUST Principles for digital repositories". Scientific Data. 7 (1): 144. Bibcode:2020NatSD...7..144L. doi:10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7. ISSN 2052-4463. PMC 7224370. PMID 32409645.
- ^ Lin, Dawei; Crabtree, Jonathan; Dillo, Ingrid; Downs, Robert R.; Edmunds, Rorie; Giaretta, David; De Giusti, Marisa; l'Hours, Hervé; Hugo, Wim; Jenkyns, Reyna; Khodiyar, Varsha; Martone, Maryann E.; Mokrane, Mustapha; Navale, Vivek; Petters, Jonathan; Sierman, Barbara; Sokolova, Dina V.; Stockhause, Martina; Westbrook, John (2020-05-14). "The TRUST Principles for digital repositories". Scientific Data. 7 (1): 144. Bibcode:2020NatSD...7..144L. doi:10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7. PMC 7224370. PMID 32409645.
- ^ "The TRUST Principles: An RDA Community Effort". 18 May 2020.
- ^ "Google Scholar". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2024-09-04.
- ^ "Altmetric – The TRUST Principles for digital repositories". nature.altmetric.com. Retrieved 2024-09-04.
- ^ Wilkinson, Mark D.; Dumontier, Michel; Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan; Appleton, Gabrielle; Axton, Myles; Baak, Arie; Blomberg, Niklas; Boiten, Jan-Willem; da Silva Santos, Luiz Bonino; Bourne, Philip E.; Bouwman, Jildau; Brookes, Anthony J.; Clark, Tim; Crosas, Mercè; Dillo, Ingrid (2016-03-15). "The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship". Scientific Data. 3 (1): 160018. Bibcode:2016NatSD...360018W. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18. ISSN 2052-4463. PMC 4792175. PMID 26978244.
- ^ Carroll, Stephanie Russo; Garba, Ibrahim; Figueroa-Rodríguez, Oscar L.; Holbrook, Jarita; Lovett, Raymond; Materechera, Simeon; Parsons, Mark; Raseroka, Kay; Rodriguez-Lonebear, Desi; Rowe, Robyn; Sara, Rodrigo; Walker, Jennifer D.; Anderson, Jane; Hudson, Maui (2020-11-04). "The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance". Data Science Journal. 19 (1). doi:10.5334/dsj-2020-043. ISSN 1683-1470.
- ^ https://www.coretrustseal.org/
- ^ https://www.langzeitarchivierung.de/Webs/nestor/EN/Zertifizierung/nestor_Siegel/siegel.html
- ^ https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/652x0m1.pdf