Draft:Revenued

Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,763 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · Revenued (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 8 hours ago by Sdomenique (talk: D · +) · Last edited 2 hours ago by Citation bot

Submission declined on 9 January 2025 by Dan arndt (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Dan arndt 22 hours ago. Last edited by Citation bot 2 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 7 January 2025 by QEnigma (talk).

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by QEnigma 2 days ago.

Submission declined on 7 January 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 days ago.

Submission declined on 7 January 2025 by Bonadea (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Bonadea 2 days ago.

Comment: Requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Podcast, interviews and press releases are all primary sources and not independent of the subject. Dan arndt (talk) 05:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Remove all the inline external links, and convert to citations (see WP:REFB for advice). Inline links are not allowed, inline citations are either required or at least preferred. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Comment: With the exception of the company website, all the sources are dead links: domains for sale, 404, site-not-found messages... bonadea contributions talk 14:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Industry: Financial Technology

Founded: 2017

Headquarters: Coral Gables, Florida

Website: Revenued Official Website www.revenued.com

Revenued is a financial technology company that provides a platform aimed at assisting small businesses and entrepreneurs in managing business credit, accessing funding, and enhancing their financial profiles.^[1] The company was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida.Its primary focus is on creating tools and resources to help business owners improve their creditworthiness and secure financial support for growth and sustainability. ^[2]

History

Revenued was founded by Solomon Lax, who serves as the company's CEO.^[3] Lax is an entrepreneur with experience in the financial technology sector. His vision for Revenued was to address the challenges faced by small businesses in accessing credit and funding.^[4] Under his leadership, Revenued has developed into a platform that integrates technology with financial solutions tailored to the needs of small business owners.^[5]

References

^ "Revenued Business Card Review: Pros, Cons, & How to Apply". Retrieved 2025-01-09.
^ "What Is a Revenued Business Card and How Does It Work?: Pros, Cons, & How to Apply". Retrieved 2025-01-09.
^ "Financing Solutions for Businesses". Retrieved 2025-01-09.
^ "About Revenued". 29 July 2024. Retrieved 2025-01-09.
^ "Revenued Announces its First 1,000 Corporate Cards Issued". Retrieved 2025-01-09.

Category:Financial technology companies Category:Companies based in Florida

[1] "Revenued Business Card Review: Pros, Cons, & How to Apply". Retrieved 2025-01-09.

[2] "What Is a Revenued Business Card and How Does It Work?: Pros, Cons, & How to Apply". Retrieved 2025-01-09.

[3] "Financing Solutions for Businesses". Retrieved 2025-01-09.

[4] "About Revenued". 29 July 2024. Retrieved 2025-01-09.

[5] "Revenued Announces its First 1,000 Corporate Cards Issued". Retrieved 2025-01-09.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]