Draft:Printer's Waste
Submission declined on 15 July 2024 by Bluethricecreamman (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: Should be merged into Errors, freaks, and odditiesIn particular, three of the sources are actually just about the Nixon Invert, If this should be its own article, we should try to make it more clear why this is significantly different than EFOs Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Printer's waste encompasses various issues related to postage stamp production, including unfinished products, defective stamps known as errors, freaks, and oddities (EFOs),[1][2] damaged items, and failed printing trials.[3][4]
Most of this material is intercepted at the printing facility and designated for destruction, either on-site or elsewhere. However, considering the billions of stamps produced annually, it's inevitable that some of this waste avoids destruction and ends up being purchased by postal customers. Furthermore, there's always a risk of employees stealing EFOs and other waste materials, which could then be sold to stamp dealers or collectors for significant amounts.[3][5]
Printer's waste stamps do not have a Scott catalogue number and usually are not covered in philately catalogs. Printer's waste are usually considered stolen property and can be confiscated by the law enforcement.[4]
The majority of the printers waste is found imperforate.[6]
Well known examples
[edit]Nixon invert
[edit]One of the most famous examples of printer's waste is the Nixon invert (32¢, Scott 2955) issued in 1995, when a printing plant employee stole a set of misprinted inverted stamps and later sold it to some dealers. The first stamp that went to sale to the public sold for $16,675 in an auction. The printing plant employee was later arrested and charged for theft.[7][8] Out of the 160 stamps that were stolen, all were recovered but two. The dealer's claimed that the 2 stamps are lost, but it is presumed they are in the hands of private collectors. The stamps cannot be sold publicly and if there whereabouts become known, they can be confiscated.[9]
Other examples
[edit]- Imperf 1893 Columbian 2¢ (Scott 231)[3]
- 1969 6¢ Apollo 8 (Scott 1371) - It have been known to trade the marketplace between $1500 to $2000 USD. [4]
- 1975 10¢ Pioneer-Jupiter (Scott 1556) - It have been known to trade the marketplace between $1500 to $2000 USD.[4]
References
[edit]- ^ "Briefmarkenkatalog". stamps.postmuseum.li. Retrieved 2024-04-05.
- ^ Scott A. Shaulis (Spring 2013). EFOs: Errors, Freaks and Oddities. Errors, Freaks & Oddities Collectors' Club.
- ^ a b c "Printer's waste varies as to cause and effect". Linns Stamp News. Retrieved 2024-04-05.
- ^ a b c d "What is printer's waste?". Linns Stamp News. Retrieved 2024-04-05.
- ^ "EFOs — A Great Part of Philatelic Alphabet Soup by Wayne Youngblood". American Philatelic Society (stamps.org). Retrieved 2024-04-05.
- ^ "Printers Waste". www.nigelgooding.co.uk. Retrieved 2024-04-05.
- ^ "United States of America, Appellee, v. Clarence Robert Robie, Defendant-appellant, 166 F.3d 444 (2d Cir. 1999)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2024-02-22.
- ^ "Inverted Nixon stamp sells for $16,675 - UPI Archives". UPI. Retrieved 2024-02-22.
- ^ "Most Richard Nixon inverts recovered". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved 2024-02-22.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.