Draft:Polarised Big Bang hypothesis
This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Bwallum (talk | contribs) 2 months ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? or |
The Polarised Big Bang hypothesis is that our visible universe largely originated from a non exclusive big bang and that the big bang was polarised. The polarisation explains gravity and conservation of energy as primarily centripetal.
The polarisation is termed positive and negative. This is not to give it any special context, it could equally be called north and south, up and down or any other terminology that implies an equal and opposite pair of forces.
Shape of expansion
[edit]The polarisation defines the shape of the big bang with two equal and opposite parts, moving away from each other. The three dimensional shape of the explosion can be considered similar to an hour glass or egg timer, with a constricted waste and two expanding, equal and opposed, curved funnel manifolds. These manifolds are not entirely positive or negative but are predominantly positive or negative monopole energy ejections. That is, if we consider that we are in the predominantly positive manifold we have a deficiency of negative. The negative manifold likewise has a deficiency of positive.
The effect is replicated on a smaller scale during supernova explosions. SN 1987A[1] being such an event recorded by the Hubble Space Telescope.
Gravitational effects arising from polarised origins
[edit]The two halves are considered predominantly oppositely charged and moved apart at a speed relatively faster than light. Hence the other half may in part or in full be unseen but our universe can feel its attractive effects. It is unclear at what stage of this process we currently observe.
The ends of the manifolds curl back on themselves as the expansion slows, both halves being attracted to each other and seeking to regroup.
Gravity is the force that attempts to find a balance between the polarised energy. With grouping of energy being negative deficient in the positive manifold, any manifestation of energy seeks to attract more negative energy to achieve a balance. If we call these manifestations of energy matter, then all matter will attract other matter in an attempt to take negative energy from the other. This attraction is gravity. The attraction is weak on a small scale and unable to strip the negative energy from its strong nuclear bonding. At a larger scale, such as the centre of a large galactic mass, the gravitational force is strong enough to break nuclear bonding. These energy reforming bodies we know as black holes. Polarised radiation from these black holes is evident as the black hole effectively breaks down complex matter assemblies to simple positive and negative energy streams. These streams we know as Hawking Radiation and emanate from the poles of a black hole.
Conservation of energy
[edit]The 'singularity' from which the big bang emanated was a concentration of pure balanced energy. That energy s dissipated today into the universe as positive and negative monopole charged energy.
The primary conservation method being that of monopole attraction. This hypothesis suggests that the force that emanates from monopole attraction is the one fundamental force.
As the positive and negative energy seeks to recombine, rotating dipoles are formed, more elaborate dipole structures emerge and by this effect we get to the quarks and the higher stable nuclear structures that we recognise today.
Force manifestations
[edit]Angular momentum of the 'object' in orbit. The positive core attracts the negative energy elements. In something we would call a stable form the negative elements orbit the positive nucleus. In an unstable element the negative and positive elements meet and transform each other, transforming their energy into that we may call radiation, another form of energy. It is all a manifestation of energy that originated from the big bang. Nothing disappears, although we may not currently have sufficiently good enough instruments to detect all the changes.
The orbiting energy must move at a speed relative to the nucleus energy to avoid collision with the nucleus to remain stable. It is the centripetal energy of orbiting that provides conservation of energy. The positive charge exceeds the negative charge if we artificially stop the orbit. We know this from the way electrons and protons collide. They give us different forms of energy, not annihilation. The orbiting of all negative energy around a positive nucleus gives us the relative stability that we call reality. They are not equal charges. The way that the electron compensates for it's lower charge is by orbiting, that is by using its momentum and centripetal energy. In our part of the universe, we are negative deficient. The other side of our 'egg timer' universe is positive deficient.
Energy is all we have
[edit]'Matter' takes on the form we 'see' because with all the activity of orbiting energy, there is no room for anything else to occupy the same space. If it does we see a change in the manifestation of energy. It 're-acts' and changes into something else. Matter does not exist as a separate entity to energy. Our universe is all energy. Our limitation to understand that the perceived solid object we hold in our hand is defined by our limitations in observing it. What we have is the space that energy fills and if stable, to the exclusion of all other energy, appears to us as solid. Pressing a finger on a table, or a jelly has different effects. What is actually happening is the relative strength of the billions of combined energy 'packets' resisting being unbonded. The table bonded energy is stronger than a finger and vice versa with a jelly. If we 'see' it then our detection kit is picking up a reaction, photons bouncing off an object for sight, an electron tunnelling microscope detecting a voltage or current change. We never 'see' anything directly at the fundamental energy scale.
Harmonic effects of centripetal conservation of energy
[edit]In the same way our moon influences earth's seas, nesting of orbiting matter creates varying levels of interaction and harmonic effects. The Moon orbits the earth, which in turn orbits the Sun and so on. The Sun and the Moon combined give us Spring and Neap tides. This nesting of centripetal forces at a very small scale, form what some physicists consider to be additional dimensions.
The hypothesis is an original work in progress by Robert Bruce Wallum.
References
[edit]