Submission declined on 25 October 2024 by I dream of horses (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by I dream of horses 2 seconds ago. Last edited by I dream of horses 2 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Comment: Not well sourced. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 01:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Opium Bird

The term “Opium Bird” may sound mysterious or exotic, sparking curiosity about whether such a bird exists. Is it real or just a legend? Is it connected to opium in some way? This article will explore the concept of the “Opium Bird,” unraveling any myths, legends, and possible truths behind it. We’ll also delve into which birds might be linked to this mysterious term and whether it’s based on any actual facts. Let’s discover the story behind the “Opium Bird” together.[1]

Is the Opium Bird Real or Fake?

To put it simply, the “Opium Bird” is not real as a specific bird species. It is not listed in any scientific bird guides or ornithological (bird study) books. The name “Opium Bird” seems to be more of a local nickname or a description for certain birds that live near poppy fields, where opium is harvested.

The term might have emerged because people living in these regions found some birds flying around the fields of opium poppies. They might have thought these birds had a special connection to the plants, and so they began calling them “Opium Birds.” However, this is based more on stories and local beliefs rather than on any real, scientific connection between the birds and the opium poppy plant.[2]